Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused Under Section 304 Part II IPC for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder — Single Blow with Bamboo Stick Causing Death. The court held that the act was done with knowledge of likelihood of death but without intention to cause death, confirming the sentence of ten years' rigorous imprisonment.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Iqbal @ Bada Khan Nasir Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane in Sessions Case No.394/2011 for the offence punishable under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for ten years and a fine of Rs.5000, with default imprisonment of three months. The incident occurred on 21st June 2011 at about 9.30 a.m. to 11.00 a.m. at Rashid Compound, Kausa, Mumbra, District Thane. The deceased, Wasim Faruq (also known as Wasim Chapra), was at the house of PW5 Jakir Yusuf Beg. The appellant came there, called Wasim outside, and after a quarrel, slapped and assaulted him. The appellant then lifted a bamboo stick and hit Wasim on the head, causing him to become unconscious and fall. Wasim was taken to Shahin Hospital and then to Kalsekar Hospital, where he was declared dead. The father of the deceased, PW1 Faruq Chapra, lodged a report (Exh.13) at Mumbra Police Station, leading to the registration of C.R.No.I314 of 2011. The appellant was charged under Section 302 IPC for murder. The trial court convicted him under Section 304 Part II IPC, holding that the act was done with knowledge that it was likely to cause death but without intention to cause death. The appellant appealed against the conviction and sentence. The High Court of Bombay, in Criminal Appeal No.1205 of 2012, heard the appeal. The appellant argued that the incident was a sudden quarrel and the single blow did not amount to murder. The state argued that the injury was sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature. The court examined the evidence, including the testimony of PW5 Jakir Yusuf Beg, who witnessed the incident, and the medical evidence. The post-mortem report (Exh.22) showed a lacerated wound on the head and a fracture of the skull. The court held that the appellant had no intention to cause death but had knowledge that such a blow was likely to cause death. The court upheld the conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC and confirmed the sentence of ten years' rigorous imprisonment. The appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Culpable Homicide not amounting to murder - Section 304 Part II Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Single blow with bamboo stick - The appellant hit the deceased once with a bamboo stick on the head, causing death. The court held that the act was done with the knowledge that it was likely to cause death but without intention to cause death, thus falling under Part II of Section 304 IPC. (Paras 1-14)

B) Evidence - Medical evidence - Cause of death - Head injury - The post-mortem report showed a lacerated wound on the head and fracture of the skull, leading to death. The court relied on medical evidence to conclude that the injury was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death. (Paras 8-10)

C) Sentencing - Rigorous imprisonment - Section 304 Part II IPC - The appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for ten years and fine of Rs.5000, with default sentence of three months. The court considered the nature of the offence and the fact that the appellant used a dangerous weapon. (Para 14)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant's act of hitting the deceased with a bamboo stick once, causing death, amounts to murder under Section 300 IPC or culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction of the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code and the sentence of rigorous imprisonment for ten years and fine of Rs.5000, in default rigorous imprisonment for three months, is confirmed.

Law Points

  • Culpable Homicide not amounting to murder
  • Section 304 Part II IPC
  • Single blow
  • Knowledge of likelihood of death
  • No intention to cause death
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (10) 103

Criminal Appeal No.1205 of 2012

2018-10-09

A.M. Badar, J.

Mr. Ganesh Bhujbal (Appointed Advocate for the Appellant), Mr. S.V. Gavand (APP for the Respondent/State)

Iqbal @ Bada Khan Nasir Shaikh

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction and sentence for culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal or reduction of sentence.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted under Section 304 Part II IPC and sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted the appellant under Section 304 Part II IPC and sentenced him to ten years' rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.5000.

Issues

Whether the appellant's act of hitting the deceased with a bamboo stick once, causing death, amounts to murder under Section 300 IPC or culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the incident was a sudden quarrel and the single blow did not amount to murder, and that the conviction under Section 304 Part II was excessive. Respondent/State argued that the injury was sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature and the conviction was correct.

Ratio Decidendi

The act of the appellant in hitting the deceased with a bamboo stick on the head, causing a fracture of the skull and death, was done with the knowledge that it was likely to cause death but without any intention to cause death. Hence, the offence falls under Part II of Section 304 IPC and not under Section 302 IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

By this appeal, the appellant/accused is challenging the judgment and order dated 25th September 2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Thane in Sessions Case No.394/2011, thereby convicting the appellant/accused of the offence punishable under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years apart from imposing fine of Rs.5000/ and in default directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. The appellant/accused Iqbal Shaikh came at the house of PW5 Jakir Yusuf Beg and called Wasim Chapra outside the house. When Wasim Chapra went out of the house of PW5 Jakir Yusuf Beg, the appellant/accused started quarrel with him. He slapped and assaulted Wasim Chapra. Then by lifting a bamboo stick, appellant/accused Iqbal Shaikh assaulted Wasim Chapra.

Procedural History

The appellant was tried in Sessions Case No.394/2011 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, convicted under Section 304 Part II IPC on 25th September 2012, and sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment. He appealed to the High Court of Bombay in Criminal Appeal No.1205 of 2012, which was dismissed on 9th October 2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 304 Part II, 302, 300
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused Under Section 304 Part II IPC for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder — Single Blow with Bamboo Stick Causing Death. The court held that the act was done with knowledge of likelihood of death bu...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRDC's Petition Challenging Withdrawal from Land Acquisition Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Subsequent Purchaser Allowed to Seek Return of Land as Acquisition Was Not Completed Within Stipulated Time.