Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Marital Rape Case Due to Compromise and Divorce. Section 376(b) IPC Not Attracted as Parties Were Divorced and Living Separately for Years.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Madhav Khodke, a teacher, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of FIR No. 33 of 2016 registered at Paradh Police Station for offences under Sections 376(b) and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The respondent No.2, Bebinanda Ambhore, is the applicant's ex-wife. They were married on 04-06-1994 and cohabited till 1996. Disputes arose, leading to a complaint under Section 498A IPC and a divorce petition in 1999. The parties compromised, filed a consent pursis, and obtained a divorce. The applicant paid full and final settlement for maintenance, and custody of their daughter was given to the mother. The FIR was lodged on 18-07-2016, nearly 20 years after separation, alleging that the applicant had sexual intercourse with the respondent No.2 on the pretext of marriage and assaulted her. The applicant contended that the FIR was a malicious afterthought and an abuse of process. The court noted that Section 376(b) IPC applies only when the wife is living separately under a decree of separation or custom, but here the parties were divorced and living separately for years. The court also considered that all disputes had been settled and the respondent No.2 had no objection to quashing. The court held that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process and quashed the FIR.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Inherent Powers - FIR under Sections 376(b) and 323 IPC was quashed as the parties were divorced and had settled all disputes, and the continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law. (Paras 1-6)

B) Indian Penal Code - Marital Rape - Section 376(b) IPC - Not Attracted - The provision applies only when the wife is living separately under a decree of separation or custom, but here the parties were divorced and living separately for years, hence no offence made out. (Paras 3-5)

C) Compromise - Non-Compoundable Offences - Quashing - The High Court in exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC can quash proceedings even in non-compoundable offences if the parties have genuinely settled and the chances of conviction are bleak. (Para 6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR under Section 376(b) and 323 IPC can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC when the parties have been divorced and have settled all disputes.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. FIR No. 33 of 2016 registered with Paradh Police Station for offences under Sections 376(b) and 323 IPC is quashed and set aside.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Section 376(b) IPC
  • Section 323 IPC
  • Marital Rape Exception
  • Compromise in Non-Compoundable Offences
  • Abuse of Process of Law
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (10) 1

Criminal Application No. 4801 of 2016

2018-10-16

T. V. Nalawade, Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi

Mr. M. S. Shaikh for applicant, Mr. S. J. Salgare for respondent No.1/State, Mr. R. P. Raut for respondent No.2

Madhav s/o Dharmaji Khodke

The State of Maharashtra and Bebinanda d/o Maroti Ambhore

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No. 33 of 2016 registered at Paradh Police Station for offences under Sections 376(b) and 323 IPC.

Filing Reason

The applicant, a teacher, was accused of marital rape and assault by his ex-wife after 20 years of separation and divorce.

Previous Decisions

The parties had obtained a divorce by consent in 1999 and settled all disputes including maintenance.

Issues

Whether the FIR under Section 376(b) and 323 IPC can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC when the parties have been divorced and have settled all disputes.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant argued that the FIR was a malicious afterthought and an abuse of process as the parties were divorced and living separately for years. The respondent No.2 had no objection to the quashing of the FIR.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 376(b) IPC applies only when the wife is living separately under a decree of separation or custom, but here the parties were divorced and living separately for years, hence no offence is made out. The High Court can quash proceedings under Section 482 CrPC even in non-compoundable offences if the parties have genuinely settled and the chances of conviction are bleak.

Judgment Excerpts

The informant had agreed that, she will not claim any kind of right as a wife in a husband's property. The provision of Section 376(b) IPC applies only when the wife is living separately under a decree of separation or custom, but here the parties were divorced and living separately for years.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Criminal Application No. 4801 of 2016 under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No. 33 of 2016. The court heard both sides and disposed of the application by quashing the FIR.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 376(b), 323, 498A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Marital Rape Case Due to Compromise and Divorce. Section 376(b) IPC Not Attracted as Parties Were Divorced and Living Separately for Years.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Writ Appeal in Employee Transfer Case with Directions on Administrative Procedure. Court Grants Interim Status Quo on Posting and Holds That Chief Minister's Office Should Not Interfere in Employee Transfers, Which...