Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Invalidity of Scheduled Tribe Certificate Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Caste Validity Certificate of Petitioner Belonging to Thakar Tribe Restored as Committee Failed to Provide Opportunity of Hearing Before Rejection.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Akshay Sanjay Pawar, claiming to belong to the Thakar Tribe (a recognized Scheduled Tribe), filed a writ petition seeking direction to the Scheduled Tribe Certificates Scrutiny Committee, Nashik to decide his application for grant of a Caste Validity Certificate. He had obtained a caste certificate from the Sub-Divisional Officer, Karla, Ahmednagar on 17 May 2004. Pending the committee's decision, he was admitted to a Mechanical Engineering degree course at Government College of Engineering, Pune under the Scheduled Tribe reserved category. During the pendency of the petition, the committee passed an order on 28 March 2012 invalidating his claim on the ground that the caste certificate was not obtained from the competent authority in proper format. The petitioner challenged this order by way of amendment, contending that he was never informed of the rejection and was not given an opportunity of hearing. The court found that the committee had called the petitioner for inquiry but did not inform him that his claim was already rejected. The court held that the order violated principles of natural justice as no opportunity of hearing was afforded. Consequently, the court quashed the impugned order and directed the committee to decide the petitioner's claim afresh after giving him a reasonable opportunity of hearing, including the right to cross-examine witnesses and produce evidence. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Natural Justice - Opportunity of Hearing - Scheduled Tribes (Recognition) - The Scrutiny Committee invalidated the petitioner's caste certificate without affording him a personal hearing, violating principles of natural justice - Held that the order is unsustainable and liable to be set aside (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order of the Scheduled Tribe Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's caste certificate without providing an opportunity of hearing is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 28 March 2012 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Scrutiny Committee, Nashik is quashed and set aside. The committee is directed to decide the petitioner's claim afresh after giving him a reasonable opportunity of hearing, including the right to cross-examine witnesses and produce evidence. The petition is allowed.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • opportunity of hearing
  • caste validity certificate
  • Scheduled Tribe
  • Thakar tribe
  • procedural fairness
  • quashing of order
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (09) 39

Writ Petition No.7457 of 2018

2018-09-28

S.C. Dharmadhikari, Smt. Bharati H. Dangre

Mr.R.K. Mendadkar for the petitioner, Mr.V.M. Mali, AGP for the respondent nos.1 to 4

Akshay Sanjay Pawar

The State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the Scheduled Tribe Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's caste certificate.

Remedy Sought

Direction to the Scrutiny Committee to decide the petitioner's application for caste validity certificate and to permit him to prosecute his studies in Mechanical Engineering from the reserved category.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's caste certificate was invalidated by the committee without providing an opportunity of hearing.

Previous Decisions

The Scrutiny Committee passed an order on 28 March 2012 invalidating the petitioner's claim, which was served on the petitioner on 30 July 2018 during the pendency of the petition.

Issues

Whether the order of the Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's caste certificate without affording an opportunity of hearing is sustainable in law.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that he was never informed that his claim was rejected and was not given an opportunity of hearing before the impugned order. The respondents did not contest the violation of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi

An order invalidating a caste certificate without affording an opportunity of hearing to the claimant violates principles of natural justice and is liable to be set aside.

Judgment Excerpts

The said order invalidates the claim of the petitioner as belonging to Thakar Scheduled Tribe on the ground that the caste certificate of the petitioner is not obtained from the competent authority in proper format. Though he was called by the respondent no.2 Committee for inquiry into his claim, he was never informed that his claim was already rejected on dated 28th March 2012.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 6 June 2018 seeking direction to the Scrutiny Committee to decide his application. During pendency, the committee's order dated 28 March 2012 was served on him. He amended the petition to challenge that order. The court heard the matter and reserved judgment on 1 August 2018, pronouncing it on 28 September 2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Invalidity of Scheduled Tribe Certificate Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Caste Validity Certificate of Petitioner Belonging to Thakar Tribe Restored as Committee Failed to Provide Opportunity of Hea...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Injunction in Arbitration Dispute Over Development Agreement. Court holds that disputes regarding termination of a development agreement are arbitrable and that interim relief under Section 9 cannot ...