Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Mandamus to Register Will and Issue Succession Certificate. Court holds that registration of Will after testator's death is impermissible and succession certificate can only be granted by civil court, not through writ petition.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, legal heirs of late Sebastiao Gracias, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondents to register a Will allegedly executed by the deceased and to issue a succession certificate. The petitioners claimed that the Will was executed in their favor and that the respondents, including family members and government authorities, were obstructing their rights. The court examined the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908, and the Indian Succession Act, 1925. It noted that under the Registration Act, a Will can only be registered during the lifetime of the testator, as the executant must admit execution before the registering officer. After the death of the testator, no registration is possible. Further, the court observed that a succession certificate can only be granted by a civil court under Part X of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and not by any administrative authority. The court also held that a writ petition under Article 226 is not maintainable for adjudicating disputed questions of title and succession, as these require a full-fledged trial with evidence. The court dismissed the petition, leaving the petitioners to seek their remedies before the appropriate civil court.

Headnote

A) Registration Act, 1908 - Registration of Will after death of testator - Not permissible - The court held that a Will cannot be registered after the death of the testator as the executant is not available to admit execution, and the registering authority has no power to register a Will posthumously. (Paras 1-10)

B) Succession Act, 1925 - Succession Certificate - Issuance by civil court only - The court held that a succession certificate can only be granted by a civil court under Part X of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and not by a registering authority or through a writ petition. (Paras 1-10)

C) Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Maintainability of writ petition for disputed questions of title - Not maintainable - The court held that a writ petition under Article 226 is not the appropriate remedy for adjudicating disputed questions of title and succession, and the petitioners must approach the civil court for appropriate relief. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is maintainable for directing the registration of a Will after the death of the testator and for issuance of a succession certificate by the registering authority.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. The petitioners are at liberty to approach the civil court for appropriate relief regarding the Will and succession certificate.

Law Points

  • Registration of Will after death of testator is not permissible under the Registration Act
  • 1908
  • Succession Certificate cannot be issued by registering authority
  • Writ petition under Article 226 not maintainable for disputed questions of title and succession
  • Remedy lies before civil court for declaration and succession certificate.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (08) 142

Writ Petition No.584 of 2017

2018-08-10

Nutan D. Sardessai

Shri M. B. D'Costa, Senior Advocate with Ms. K. Betquecar for Petitioners; Shri P. A. Kholkar for Respondent Nos.1 and 2; Ms. Neha Kholkar, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos.6 to 8

Mary Bertha Gracias and others

Jeronimo Fernandes and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus for registration of Will and issuance of succession certificate.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to register the Will of late Sebastiao Gracias and to issue a succession certificate in favor of petitioners.

Filing Reason

Petitioners claimed that the Will executed by the deceased in their favor was not being registered by the authorities and that they were being denied their rights.

Issues

Whether a Will can be registered after the death of the testator under the Registration Act, 1908. Whether a succession certificate can be issued by a registering authority or only by a civil court. Whether a writ petition under Article 226 is maintainable for disputed questions of title and succession.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the Will was validly executed and should be registered, and that the respondents were illegally withholding the succession certificate. Respondents contended that registration of a Will after death is not permissible and that the matter involves disputed questions of fact which cannot be adjudicated in a writ petition.

Ratio Decidendi

A Will cannot be registered after the death of the testator as the executant is not available to admit execution. A succession certificate can only be granted by a civil court under the Indian Succession Act, 1925. A writ petition under Article 226 is not maintainable for adjudicating disputed questions of title and succession.

Judgment Excerpts

Rule. Heard forthwith with the consent of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks a direction to the respondents to register the Will of late Sebastiao Gracias and to issue a succession certificate.

Procedural History

The petition was filed in 2017, heard on 2 August 2018, and judgment pronounced on 10 August 2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Registration Act, 1908:
  • Indian Succession Act, 1925:
  • Constitution of India, 1950: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Upholds Impounding of Arbitration Agreement for Stamp Duty Deficiency — Civil Court Must Refer to Deputy Commissioner Under Section 37(2) of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957. The court held that the arbitration agreement is an inst...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Mandamus to Register Will and Issue Succession Certificate. Court holds that registration of Will after testator's death is impermissible and succession certificate can only be granted by civil court, not thro...