Bombay High Court Dismisses Revocation Petition in Probate Case — Sisters of Predeceased Wife Not Heirs of Testator Under Indian Succession Act. Court holds that only kindred of the deceased, not kindred of the predeceased spouse, are entitled to citation in probate proceedings.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case concerns a revocation petition filed by Angelina Pascoal Mendes and Philomena Pascoal Mendes (petitioners) seeking to revoke the grant of probate of the Will of Joseph John Remedios (Joseph) in favor of Savio D'Souza (respondent). Joseph died on 4th January 2013 leaving a Will dated 1st January 2013, naming Savio as executor and major legatee. Savio filed Testamentary Petition No. 119 of 2014 for probate, without citing the petitioners. The petitioners, who are sisters of Joseph's predeceased wife Maria, claimed they were heirs entitled to citation. The court analyzed the relevant provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, particularly Sections 32 to 35, which define the order of succession for intestates other than Parsis. It held that 'kindred' refers to blood relatives of the deceased, not relatives of the predeceased spouse. Since the petitioners were not blood relatives of Joseph, they were not his heirs and had no right to be cited. The court also noted that Savio, as executor, was duty-bound to apply for probate. The revocation petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Succession Law - Probate - Citation - Heirs of Predeceased Spouse - Sections 32, 33, 33A, 34, 35, Indian Succession Act, 1925 - The court considered whether sisters of the testator's predeceased wife are 'kindred' of the testator and thus entitled to citation in probate proceedings. Held that under the Indian Succession Act, only kindred of the deceased (blood relatives) are heirs; kindred of the predeceased spouse are not heirs of the testator. Therefore, the petitioners were not required to be cited. (Paras 5-7)

B) Succession Law - Probate - Revocation of Grant - Section 263, Indian Succession Act, 1925 - The court examined whether the grant of probate should be revoked for non-citation of the petitioners. Held that since the petitioners were not heirs of the testator, there was no duty to cite them, and no ground for revocation was made out. (Paras 8-9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners, being sisters of the testator's predeceased wife, are heirs of the testator and thus entitled to be cited in probate proceedings.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Miscellaneous Petition No. 39 of 2017 is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Probate
  • Citation
  • Heirs
  • Kindred
  • Indian Succession Act 1925
  • Section 32
  • Section 33
  • Section 33A
  • Section 34
  • Section 35
  • Section 283
  • Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018:BHC-OS:10790

Miscellaneous Petition No. 39 of 2017 in Testamentary Petition No. 119 of 2014

2018-07-26

G.S. Patel, J.

2018:BHC-OS:10790

Mrs Leena Fernandes for Petitioners, Mr RN Bhagattjee for Respondent

Angelina Pascoal Mendes and Philomena Pascoal Mendes

Savio D'Souza

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Revocation petition seeking to revoke grant of probate of a Will.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought revocation of probate granted to respondent on ground that they were not cited as heirs.

Filing Reason

Petitioners claimed they were heirs of the testator and should have been cited in probate proceedings.

Previous Decisions

Probate was granted to respondent in Testamentary Petition No. 119 of 2014 without citing petitioners.

Issues

Whether the petitioners, being sisters of the testator's predeceased wife, are heirs of the testator under the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Whether the grant of probate should be revoked for non-citation of the petitioners.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued they were heirs of the testator and should have been cited. Respondent argued that petitioners were not heirs as they were not blood relatives of the testator; they were only relatives of the predeceased wife.

Ratio Decidendi

Under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, only kindred (blood relatives) of the deceased are heirs; relatives of the predeceased spouse are not heirs of the testator. Therefore, the petitioners were not entitled to citation in probate proceedings, and no ground for revocation of probate was made out.

Judgment Excerpts

As a general principle, I think this is a correct interpretation of the relevant provisions Indian Succession Act 1925. The claimants/present Petitioners were not Jospeh’s heirs; they were his predeceased wife’s heirs, being her sisters.

Procedural History

Respondent filed Testamentary Petition No. 119 of 2014 for probate of Will dated 1st January 2013 of Joseph John Remedios. Probate was granted. Petitioners filed Miscellaneous Petition No. 39 of 2017 seeking revocation of the grant. The court heard both sides and dismissed the revocation petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Succession Act, 1925: 32, 33, 33A, 34, 35, 263, 283
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revocation Petition in Probate Case — Sisters of Predeceased Wife Not Heirs of Testator Under Indian Succession Act. Court holds that only kindred of the deceased, not kindred of the predeceased spouse, are entitled to c...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Knife Attack Case. Life Imprisonment Confirmed for Accused Who Stabbed Multiple Victims, Causing One Death, Based on Credible Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence.