High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Seeking Cumulative Age Relaxation for Government Servant Belonging to OBC Category. Age relaxation for government servants and OBC candidates cannot be cumulated; each relaxation is separate and maximum age limit is fixed.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shri Dilip V. Sawant, was a Draughtsman Grade-II in the Town and Country Planning Department, Government of Goa, and belonged to the Other Backward Class (OBC). He applied for the post of Deputy Town Planner pursuant to an advertisement issued on 11 January 2008 by the Goa Public Service Commission. The last date for submission was 31 January 2008. The petitioner was 45 years and 5 months old on the relevant date. His application was rejected on the ground that he was overage, as the maximum age limit for the post was 45 years. The petitioner claimed that as a government servant, he was entitled to age relaxation up to 48 years, and as an OBC candidate, he was entitled to further relaxation, cumulatively. The Court examined the Goa Public Service Commission (Limits of Age) Rules, 2005. Rule 3 fixed the maximum age limit at 45 years. Rule 4 provided relaxation for government servants to the extent of the period of service rendered, not exceeding 3 years. Rule 5 provided relaxation for OBC candidates by 2 years, but only for direct recruits. The Court held that the relaxations are separate and cannot be cumulated. Since the petitioner was a government servant, he could not claim the OBC relaxation meant for direct recruits. Even if cumulated, the maximum age would be 48 years, but the petitioner was 45 years and 5 months, which was within 48 years. However, the Court found that the relaxation for government servants is not a fixed 3 years but depends on the period of service rendered. The petitioner had rendered about 18 years of service, so he could get relaxation up to 3 years, making the maximum age 48 years. But the OBC relaxation of 2 years is not available to him as he is not a direct recruit. Therefore, the petitioner was overage. The petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Age Relaxation - Cumulative Benefit - Goa Public Service Commission (Limits of Age) Rules, 2005 - The petitioner, a government servant and OBC candidate, sought cumulative age relaxation of 5 years (3 years for government servants + 2 years for OBC). The Court held that the Rules provide separate and distinct relaxations for different categories, and they cannot be cumulated. The maximum age limit for the post was 45 years, and the petitioner was over 45 years. The relaxation for government servants is only to the extent of the period of service rendered, not a fixed 3 years. The OBC relaxation is 2 years but only for direct recruits, not for government servants. Since the petitioner was already a government servant, he could not claim OBC relaxation. The petition was dismissed. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a government servant belonging to Other Backward Class is entitled to cumulative age relaxation under the Goa Public Service Commission (Limits of Age) Rules, 2005, i.e., relaxation for government servants plus relaxation for OBC candidates.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. The rejection of the petitioner's application is upheld.

Law Points

  • Age relaxation for government servants and OBC candidates cannot be cumulated
  • each relaxation is separate
  • maximum age limit is fixed
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018:BHC-GOA:822-DB

Writ Petition No. 714 of 2008

2018-03-27

N. M. Jamdar, Prithviraj K. Chavan

2018:BHC-GOA:822-DB

Mr. Devidas J. Pangam for Petitioner, Mr. Deep Shirodkar for Respondent 1, Mr. Amir Jamadar for Respondent 2, Mr. Pankaj Vernekar with Mr. Abhishek Sawant for Respondent 3

Shri Dilip V. Sawant

State of Goa, Goa Public Service Commission, Shri Sanjay Anant Halornekar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging rejection of application for post of Deputy Town Planner on ground of age bar.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to consider his application for the post of Deputy Town Planner with age relaxation.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's application was rejected as he was overage (45 years 5 months) and he claimed cumulative age relaxation as government servant and OBC candidate.

Issues

Whether a government servant belonging to OBC is entitled to cumulative age relaxation under the Goa Public Service Commission (Limits of Age) Rules, 2005?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that as a government servant he is entitled to age relaxation up to 48 years and as OBC candidate further relaxation, cumulatively. Respondents argued that relaxations are separate and cannot be cumulated; OBC relaxation is only for direct recruits.

Ratio Decidendi

Age relaxations for different categories under the Goa Public Service Commission (Limits of Age) Rules, 2005 are separate and cannot be cumulated. A government servant cannot claim the OBC relaxation meant for direct recruits.

Judgment Excerpts

Whether he is right in his interpretation is the short question to be decided in this petition. The relaxations are separate and distinct and cannot be cumulated.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 714 of 2008 in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the rejection of his application. The petition was heard and decided on 27 March 2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Goa Public Service Commission (Limits of Age) Rules, 2005: Rules 3, 4, 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Seeking Cumulative Age Relaxation for Government Servant Belonging to OBC Category. Age relaxation for government servants and OBC candidates cannot be cumulated; each relaxation is separate and maximum ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Encashment of Standby Letters of Credit in Commercial Dispute. Principle of Autonomy of Letters of Credit Upheld — Injunction Granted Only on Grounds of Fraud or Irreparable Injury, Not Breach of Underlyin...