Search Results for "direct recruit"

134 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 134 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Preference for Direct Recruit Assistants Over Non-Graduate Promotees in Tamil Nadu Revenue Subordinate Service. Rule Read Down to Exclude Graduate Promotees from Discrimination.

The case involves a dispute over the implementation of amended Rule 5(g) and Annexure-III item (ii) of the Tamil Nadu Revenue Subordinate Service Rule...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Promote Inspectors in Seniority Dispute Under Central Excise Recruitment Rules. Inter Se Seniority Must Be Fixed Based on 1959 and 1986 Office Memoranda with Quota Rule Compliance, Rejecting High Court's View on Vacancy Register Irrelevance.

The dispute originated from seniority fixation among Inspectors of Central Excise, recruited through direct recruitment and promotion under the Centra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Direct Recruit Section Officers' Seniority Over Promotees in Maharashtra Secretariat Service. Seniority to be determined from date of substantive appointment, not from date of ad-hoc promotion.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by direct recruit Section Officers and promotee Section Officers of the Maharashtra Secretariat Service, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Approval of Teacher Appointment Due to Suppression of Surplus Teachers and Roster Violations. Appointment of petitioner found invalid as permission to recruit was cancelled due to non-disclosure of surplus teachers and incorrect roster point.

The petitioner, Anil Gulabrao Rathod, was appointed as a teacher on 01.07.2013 after an advertisement published with prior permission from the Educati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Direct Recruit Deputy Collectors and State of Uttarakhand in Seniority Dispute. Promotee Deputy Collectors Cannot Claim Seniority from Ad Hoc Appointment Date as Appointments Were Not in Accordance with Rules Under Uttaranchal Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2005.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a seniority dispute between direct recruit and promotee Deputy Collectors in the State o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Promotee Appeal in Seniority Dispute with Direct Recruits in Income Tax Department — Direct Recruits Not Entitled to Seniority from Vacancy Year When Recruitment Process Not Initiated in That Year.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by promotees (appellants) against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which had quashed the seniority li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging CAT Order Quashing Seniority List. Seniority of Direct Recruit Inspectors Cannot Be Antedated Over Promotees Without Following DoPT OM and Recruitment Rules.

The case involves a challenge to the seniority list dated 07.12.2021 and paragraph 7(iii) of DoPT OM dated 13.08.2021 by promotee Inspectors (Examiner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Direct Recruit District Judge's Claim for Seniority Over Promotees in Kerala Higher Judicial Service. Notional Seniority Granted from Date of Initial Appointment of Other Direct Recruits in Same Selection.

The case involves a dispute over seniority between direct recruit District Judges and promotees appointed by transfer in the Kerala Higher Judicial Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Assured Career Progression Scheme Benefits to Forest Guard — Petitioner Entitled to ACPS from Date of Completion of 16 Years of Service as per Government Memorandum dated 22/2/2001. Denial of ACPS on ground of prior promotions held arbitrary and discriminatory.

The petitioner, Shri Raghunath B. Desai, a Forest Guard employed by the State of Goa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitu...