Bombay High Court Quashes Eviction Order Against Shop Occupants in Mahatma Phule Market Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Deputy Municipal Commissioner's Order Set Aside as Petitioners Were Not Heard Before Eviction.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who were occupants of shops on the first floor of Mahatma Phule Market in Jalgaon, challenged an order dated 20th January 2018 passed by the Deputy Municipal Commissioner of the Municipal Corporation of the City of Jalgaon. The order directed their eviction from the shops. The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking quashing of the eviction order and interim stay. The court heard all petitions together as they involved identical issues. The petitioners argued that the eviction order was passed without any notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. They relied on the Supreme Court judgment in M/s Baburam Prakash Chandra Maheshwari v. Antarim Zila Parishad now Zila Parishad, Muzaffarnagar [1969 AIR (SC) 556], which held that no order adverse to a person can be passed without affording him an opportunity of being heard. The respondent Corporation, represented by its advocates, placed reliance on a Division Bench judgment of the same court dated 14/07/2017 in WP No.7730/2015 and connected matters. However, the court found that the impugned order was passed without any notice or hearing, and the Corporation's reliance on the Division Bench judgment was misplaced as that judgment did not dispense with the requirement of natural justice. The court held that the order was in gross violation of natural justice and quashed it. The court also directed that the petitioners shall not be evicted without following due process of law. The decision was in favor of the petitioners.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Audi Alteram Partem - Right to be Heard - The Deputy Municipal Commissioner passed an eviction order without giving any notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioners who were occupying shops in Mahatma Phule Market. The court held that the order was passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice and quashed the same. (Paras 1-6)

B) Municipal Law - Eviction of Occupants - Requirement of Notice - The Municipal Corporation sought to evict the petitioners from their shops without following due process. The court relied on the Supreme Court judgment in M/s Baburam Prakash Chandra Maheshwari v. Antarim Zila Parishad now Zila Parishad, Muzaffarnagar [1969 AIR (SC) 556] to emphasize that no order adverse to a person can be passed without giving him an opportunity of being heard. (Paras 4-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned eviction order dated 20th January 2018 passed by the Deputy Municipal Commissioner without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 20th January 2018 passed by the Deputy Municipal Commissioner is quashed and set aside. The petitioners shall not be evicted without following due process of law.

Law Points

  • Natural Justice
  • Audi Alteram Partem
  • Right to be Heard
  • Quashing of Administrative Order
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (02) 1

Writ Petition No. 1802 of 2018 with connected writ petitions

2018-02-14

Ravindra V. Ghuge

Mr. Topan Thatte a/w Mayur Salunkhe for petitioners; Mr. P.R. Patil and Mr. Shrikant S. Patil for respondent

Kapil Variyani and others

The Municipal Corporation of the City of Jalgaon through the Municipal Commissioner

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging an eviction order passed by the Deputy Municipal Commissioner.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the eviction order dated 20th January 2018 and stay of its operation.

Filing Reason

The eviction order was passed without any notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.

Previous Decisions

The Deputy Municipal Commissioner passed the eviction order on 20th January 2018.

Issues

Whether the impugned eviction order passed without affording an opportunity of hearing is sustainable in law.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the eviction order was passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice as no notice or hearing was given. Respondent Corporation relied on a Division Bench judgment of this Court dated 14/07/2017 in WP No.7730/2015 and connected matters.

Ratio Decidendi

An order adverse to a person cannot be passed without affording him an opportunity of being heard, as per principles of natural justice. The eviction order was quashed for violation of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned order is in gross violation of the principles of natural justice. No order adverse to a person can be passed without giving him an opportunity of being heard.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the eviction order dated 20th January 2018. The court heard all petitions together and delivered judgment on 14th February 2018.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Eviction Order Against Shop Occupants in Mahatma Phule Market Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Deputy Municipal Commissioner's Order Set Aside as Petitioners Were Not Heard Before Eviction.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Return of Appeal Memo for Lack of Pecuniary Jurisdiction. Forum of appeal determined by valuation in decree, not plaint valuation under Section 8 of Suits Valuation Act, 1887 and Section 6 of Bomb...