Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition for Interim Maintenance Under Hindu Marriage Act, Setting Aside Family Court Order That Failed to Consider Wife's Income and Husband's Obligation. The Court directed the husband to pay Rs. 5,000 per month for the wife and Rs. 3,000 per month for the daughter from the date of application.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 67
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Anuja Lalit Bhowar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 24th February 2016 passed by the Family Court No.2, Mumbai, which rejected her application for interim maintenance for herself and her six-year-old daughter. The petitioner had earlier obtained a maintenance order under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, from the Metropolitan Magistrate, which was stayed by the Sessions Court upon deposit of arrears. The Family Court rejected the interim maintenance application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on the ground that the wife was earning Rs. 5,000 per month and the husband had no obligation to maintain her. The High Court found that the Family Court had not properly considered the wife's income and the husband's financial capacity. The High Court noted that the wife's income was insufficient for her and her daughter's maintenance, and the husband was earning Rs. 25,000 per month. The High Court set aside the Family Court's order and directed the husband to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 5,000 per month for the wife and Rs. 3,000 per month for the daughter from the date of application, subject to adjustment at final hearing.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Interim Maintenance - Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Wife's Income - The Family Court rejected the wife's application for interim maintenance without properly assessing her income and the husband's obligation to maintain his wife and child. The High Court held that the Family Court must consider the wife's income and the husband's capacity to pay, and that the wife is entitled to maintenance if she has no sufficient income. (Paras 5-10)

B) Family Law - Interim Maintenance - Minor Child - Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - The Family Court failed to consider the maintenance for the minor daughter separately. The High Court directed the husband to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 5,000 per month for the wife and Rs. 3,000 per month for the daughter from the date of application. (Paras 11-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Family Court erred in rejecting the wife's application for interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, by not properly considering the wife's income and the husband's financial capacity.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the Family Court's order dated 24th February 2016, and directed the respondent-husband to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 5,000 per month for the wife and Rs. 3,000 per month for the daughter from the date of application, subject to adjustment at final hearing. The respondent was directed to pay the arrears within six months.

Law Points

  • Interim maintenance
  • wife's income
  • husband's obligation
  • Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
  • Family Court's discretion
  • prima facie case
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (11) 127

Writ Petition No.10227 of 2017

2017-11-06

R.D. Dhanuka, J.

Mr.R.T.Lalwani with Mrs.Sadhana Jaikar i/by Mr.Prakash L. Mahadik for the petitioner; Mr.Prashant G. Sawant for the respondent

Anuja Lalit Bhowar

Lalit Prakash Bhowar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Family Court rejecting interim maintenance application.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought interim maintenance for herself and her minor daughter under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Filing Reason

The Family Court rejected the application for interim maintenance on the ground that the wife was earning Rs. 5,000 per month and the husband had no obligation to maintain her.

Previous Decisions

The Metropolitan Magistrate had earlier directed the husband to pay Rs. 7,000 per month for the wife and Rs. 3,600 per month for the daughter under the Domestic Violence Act. That order was stayed by the Sessions Court upon deposit of arrears.

Issues

Whether the Family Court erred in rejecting the wife's application for interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Whether the Family Court properly considered the wife's income and the husband's financial capacity.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the Family Court failed to consider that her income of Rs. 5,000 per month was insufficient for her and her daughter's maintenance, and that the husband was earning Rs. 25,000 per month. The respondent argued that the wife was earning and thus not entitled to maintenance, and that the husband had no obligation to maintain her.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, a wife is entitled to interim maintenance if she has no independent income sufficient for her support. The court must consider the wife's income and the husband's financial capacity. The Family Court's rejection of maintenance without proper assessment was erroneous.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has impugned the order dated 24th February 2016 passed by the learned Judge of the Family Court No.2, Mumbai rejecting the application filed by the petitioner for seeking interim maintenance for herself and her daughter who is six years old. The Family Court has not considered the fact that the petitioner is earning only Rs. 5,000 per month and that the respondent is earning Rs. 25,000 per month. The Family Court has erred in rejecting the application.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed an application for maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which was allowed by the Metropolitan Magistrate on 7th October 2013. Both parties appealed to the Sessions Court, which stayed the order on 30th January 2014 upon deposit of arrears. The petitioner then filed an application for interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, which was rejected by the Family Court on 24th February 2016. The petitioner challenged this order by way of writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 227
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 24
  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Instigation or Harassment. Death by Burning Held to be Accidental, Not Suicidal, Based on Medical and Circumstantial Evidence.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition for Interim Maintenance Under Hindu Marriage Act, Setting Aside Family Court Order That Failed to Consider Wife's Income and Husband's Obligation. The Court directed the husband to pay Rs. 5,000 per month for ...