Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Challenging Jalna Assembly Election Result for Non-Compliance with Section 81(3) of Representation of the People Act, 1951 — Failure to Furnish True Copies of Documents Renders Petition Invalid

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 11
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shaikh Chandpasha Shaikh Jani, filed an election petition under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, challenging the election of respondent No. 4, Arjun S/o Panditrao Khotkar, from the 101-Jalna Legislative Assembly Constituency. The petition was filed on 20th January 2014. The respondents, particularly respondent No. 4, raised preliminary objections regarding the maintainability of the petition on the ground of non-compliance with Section 81(3) of the Act, which requires that every election petition be accompanied by as many copies thereof as there are respondents, and that each copy be attested by the petitioner under his own signature to be a true copy of the petition. The court examined the copies of the petition served on the respondents and found that the documents annexed to the petition were not true copies; they were illegible, incomplete, or not properly attested. The court held that the defect was of a substantial nature and not curable, as the purpose of Section 81(3) is to ensure that the respondent receives a clear and legible copy of the petition and its annexures to enable a proper defense. Consequently, the court dismissed the election petition for non-compliance with Section 81(3) of the Act.

Headnote

A) Election Law - Election Petition - Dismissal for Non-Compliance - Section 81(3) of Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Requirement of furnishing true copies of documents - The petitioner failed to furnish true copies of the documents annexed to the election petition, which constituted a defect of substantial nature - Held that non-compliance with Section 81(3) renders the petition liable to be dismissed under Section 86(1) of the Act (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the election petition is liable to be dismissed for non-compliance with Section 81(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, for failure to furnish true copies of the documents relied upon?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The election petition is dismissed for non-compliance with Section 81(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

Law Points

  • Election petition
  • Non-compliance with Section 81(3) of Representation of the People Act
  • 1951
  • Dismissal for non-compliance
  • True copy requirement
  • Defect of substantial nature
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (11) 55

Election Petition No. 4 of 2014

0000-00-00

Mr. S.S. Thombre for petitioner; Mr. A.B. Kale, Mr. V.D. Sapkal, Mr. P.A. Bhosle for respondent No. 4; Mr. P.M. Shah, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr. ...

Shaikh Chandpasha Shaikh Jani

Election Commission of India, District Collector Jalna, Returning Officer, Arjun S/o Panditrao Khotkar, and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Election petition challenging the election of respondent No. 4 from 101-Jalna Legislative Assembly Constituency.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought declaration that the election of respondent No. 4 is void.

Filing Reason

Alleged irregularities in the election process.

Issues

Whether the election petition is liable to be dismissed for non-compliance with Section 81(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951?

Submissions/Arguments

Respondent No. 4 argued that the copies of the petition served on the respondents were not true copies as required under Section 81(3), as the annexures were illegible and incomplete. Petitioner contended that the defect, if any, was not of a substantial nature and could be cured.

Ratio Decidendi

Non-compliance with Section 81(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, by failing to furnish true copies of the documents annexed to the election petition constitutes a defect of substantial nature, rendering the petition liable to be dismissed under Section 86(1) of the Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The copies of the petition served on the respondents are not true copies as required under Section 81(3) of the Act. The defect is of a substantial nature and cannot be cured.

Procedural History

Election petition filed on 20th January 2014; preliminary objections raised by respondent No. 4 regarding maintainability; court heard arguments on the preliminary issue and dismissed the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Representation of the People Act, 1951: 81(3), 86(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Challenging Jalna Assembly Election Result for Non-Compliance with Section 81(3) of Representation of the People Act, 1951 — Failure to Furnish True Copies of Documents Renders Petition Invalid
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Subsequent Purchasers in Land Ceiling Case — Saving Clause Under Section 33(2) of Haryana Ceiling of Land Act, 1972 Excludes Application of New Act to Pending Proceedings Under Repealed Act. The Court Held That Det...