Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Res Judicata in School Expulsion Case. Earlier Judgment dated 21st July 2015 in Writ Petition No. 5378 of 2013 Bars Second Challenge to Expulsion of Children from Unaided Minority School.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 33
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Master Pavan Mundaware through his guardian Jayashree Vijay Mundaware, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the expulsion of his son and daughter from Ashoka Universal School, an unaided minority institution. The court noted that the petitioner had previously filed Writ Petition No. 5378 of 2013 on similar issues, which was disposed of by a judgment dated 21st July 2015. In that earlier judgment, the court had held that the writ petition was maintainable against the unaided minority school but declared the expulsion orders illegal and bad in law. Despite this, the petitioner filed the present petition again raising the same issues. The court observed that the earlier order dated 16th August 2013 had been passed against the petitioner. The court found that the present petition was barred by the principle of res judicata as the matter had already been finally decided between the same parties. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Res Judicata - Principle of Finality - Earlier Judgment - The petitioner filed a second writ petition challenging the expulsion of his children from an unaided minority school, despite a prior judgment dated 21st July 2015 in Writ Petition No. 5378 of 2013 which had already adjudicated the same issues between the same parties. The court held that the earlier judgment operates as res judicata and the present petition is not maintainable. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the present writ petition is maintainable in view of the earlier judgment dated 21st July 2015 passed in Writ Petition No. 5378 of 2013 between the same parties on similar issues.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Res judicata
  • maintainability of writ petition against unaided minority institution
  • finality of earlier judgment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (09) 247

Writ Petition No. 9096 of 2017

2017-09-13

Anoop V. Mohta, Smt. Bharati H. Dangre

2017:BHC-AS:24567-DB

Mr. Siddharthshankar A. Sharma for Petitioner, Mr. R.S. Apte Senior Advocate a/w Mr. A.A. Garge for Respondent No.1, Mr. A.P. Vanarse AGP for State

Master Pavan Mundaware through guardian Jayashree Vijay Mundaware

The Principal/Head Mistress of Ashoka Universal School, Ashoka Education Foundation, Deputy Director of Education, Education Officer (Secondary), Education Officer (Primary), Administrative officer Shikshan Mandal, Director of Education, Commissioner of Police, State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging expulsion of children from an unaided minority school.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to challenge the expulsion of his son and daughter from Ashoka Universal School.

Filing Reason

The petitioner filed a second writ petition despite a prior judgment dated 21st July 2015 in Writ Petition No. 5378 of 2013 which had already adjudicated the same issues.

Previous Decisions

Writ Petition No. 5378 of 2013 was disposed of by judgment dated 21st July 2015, holding the writ petition maintainable and declaring the expulsion orders illegal. An earlier High Court order dated 16th August 2013 was passed against the petitioner.

Issues

Whether the present writ petition is barred by res judicata in view of the earlier judgment dated 21st July 2015 in Writ Petition No. 5378 of 2013.

Ratio Decidendi

The principle of res judicata bars a subsequent petition between the same parties on the same issues when a final judgment has already been rendered by a competent court.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner has again filed this writ Petition though there is a specific order passed by this Court after hearing the parties as the Petitioner was expelled for the reasons which are recorded in Judgment dated 21st July, 2015 in Writ Petition No. 5378 of 2013. Between the same parties for the similar issues and based upon earlier High Court order dated 16th August, 2013 passed against the Petitioner.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 5378 of 2013 which was disposed of by judgment dated 21st July 2015. Thereafter, the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition No. 9096 of 2017 on similar issues. The court dismissed the present petition as barred by res judicata.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Charges Against Accused in Abetment of Suicide and Atrocities Case — No Prima Facie Case for Abetment or Caste-Based Insult. Allegations of harassment and casteist remarks insufficient to establish mens rea for abetment of...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Res Judicata in School Expulsion Case. Earlier Judgment dated 21st July 2015 in Writ Petition No. 5378 of 2013 Bars Second Challenge to Expulsion of Children from Unaided Minority School.