Daughter’s Right to Inheritance Before 1956 Clarified by Bombay High Court. Addressing inheritance under Hindu law before the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.


Summary of Judgement

1. Background of the Case:

The appeals revolved around whether a daughter could inherit her father’s property if he died before 1956, leaving behind a widow and daughter. The legal debate stemmed from the interplay between the Hindu Women’s Rights to Property Act, 1937, and the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

2. Key Legal Question:

“Does a daughter have inheritance rights prior to the enactment of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, when the father dies leaving a widow?”

3. Context and Historical Legal Framework:

  • The case required interpretation of inheritance laws pre-1956.
  • The Hindu Women’s Rights to Property Act, 1937, granted limited rights to widows but did not explicitly include daughters as inheritors.

4. Arguments Presented:

  • Appellants argued for progressive interpretation under the 1956 Act, amended in 2005, granting daughters inheritance rights.
  • Respondents relied on pre-1956 customs and laws, highlighting daughters were excluded where widows survived.

5. Court's Observations:

  • The court reviewed relevant sections of the 1937 Act, Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and its 2005 Amendment.
  • Historical commentaries and earlier case laws were analyzed to understand inheritance norms.

Key Provisions Discussed (Acts and Sections):

  1. Hindu Women’s Rights to Property Act, 1937:

    • Section 3: Granted limited inheritance rights to widows, equating them to sons for partition purposes but excluded daughters.
  2. Hindu Succession Act, 1956:

    • Section 6 (Pre-2005 Amendment): Recognized daughters as Class I heirs, but only for deaths post-1956.
  3. Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005:

    • Section 6 (Post-Amendment): Granted daughters coparcenary rights akin to sons, effective from 2005, with certain retrospective savings.

Ratio Decidendi:

The court concluded that a daughter has no inheritance rights to her father’s property if he died before 1956. The reasoning was based on:

  • Absence of explicit provisions in the 1937 Act granting daughters inheritance rights.
  • The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and its 2005 amendment cannot be applied retrospectively to deaths occurring before 1956.
  • Succession rights are fixed based on the laws at the time of death.

Subjects:

Hindu Succession Laws, Historical Inheritance Rights.

Inheritance, Hindu Law, Women’s Rights, Pre-1956 Succession, Legal History.

The Judgement

Case Title: Radhabai Balasaheb Shirke & Ors. Versus Keshav Ramchandra Jadhav & Ors.

Citation: 2024 LawText (BOM) (11) 126

Case Number: SECOND APPEAL NO.593 OF 1987 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO.403 OF 1990 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO.733 OF 2004

Date of Decision: 2024-11-12