Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CBFC Certificate for Film 'Indu Sarkar' on Grounds of Maintainability. Petitioner's claim as biological daughter of Sanjay Gandhi does not confer locus standi to challenge film certification under Article 226 of Constitution of India, 1950.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Priya Singh Paul, claiming to be the biological daughter of late Sanjay Gandhi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. The petition sought a writ of certiorari to quash and set aside the certificate granted by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to the film 'Indu Sarkar', directed by respondent No.1 Madhur Bhandarkar and produced by respondent No.2 Bharat Shah. The petitioner also sought a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the public exhibition, display, and viewership of the film until 30% of the facts stated by the director were deleted to the satisfaction of the CBFC. The respondents raised preliminary objections regarding the maintainability and entertainability of the writ petition, arguing that the petitioner lacked locus standi. The court heard the parties on these preliminary objections and dismissed the petition, holding that the petitioner failed to establish any personal or legal right that was infringed by the certification of the film. The court noted that the petitioner's claim of being a biological daughter of Sanjay Gandhi, without more, did not confer any right to challenge the film's certification. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Locus Standi - Article 226 of Constitution of India, 1950 - Maintainability of Writ Petition - Petitioner claiming to be biological daughter of late Sanjay Gandhi sought to quash CBFC certificate for film 'Indu Sarkar' - Court held that petitioner failed to establish any personal or legal right infringed by the certification - Mere claim of relationship without any specific legal injury does not confer standing - Petition dismissed on preliminary objection of maintainability (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner has locus standi to maintain a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the certificate granted by the Central Board of Film Certification to the film 'Indu Sarkar'.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed on the ground of maintainability. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Locus standi
  • Maintainability of writ petition
  • Article 226 of Constitution of India
  • Cinematograph Act 1952
  • Central Board of Film Certification
  • Writ of Certiorari
  • Preliminary objection
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (07) 122

Writ Petition (Lodging) No.1947 of 2017

2017-07-24

Anoop V. Mohta, Smt. Anuja Prabhudessai

Mariam Nizam Tanveer Nizam for Petitioner, Dr. Birendra Saraf for Respondent No.1, Ashish Kamat with Madhu Gadodia, Ravi Suryawanshi for Respondent No.2, Soma Singh with Anamika Malhotra for Respondent Nos.3 and 4, Kedar Dighe, AGP for Respondent No.5

Priya Singh Paul

Madhur Bhandarkar, Bharat Shah, Central Board of Film Certification, Union of India, State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the certificate granted by the Central Board of Film Certification to the film 'Indu Sarkar'.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash the CBFC certificate and a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining public exhibition of the film until 30% of facts stated by the director are deleted.

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed to be biological daughter of late Sanjay Gandhi and alleged that the film contains false and defamatory content about her family.

Issues

Whether the petitioner has locus standi to maintain the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that she is the biological daughter of late Sanjay Gandhi and has a right to protect the reputation of her family. Respondents raised preliminary objections that the petitioner lacks locus standi and the petition is not maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi

A petitioner under Article 226 must establish a personal or legal right that has been infringed. Mere claim of relationship without specific legal injury does not confer locus standi to challenge a film certification.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petition is filed by the Petitioner, who claims to be a biological daughter of late Sanjay Gandhi... Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties, finally on the preliminary objections to the maintainability and entertainability of present writ petition.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed on an unspecified date. The court heard the parties on preliminary objections regarding maintainability and dismissed the petition on 24th July 2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India, 1950: Article 226
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XXVII Rule 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CBFC Certificate for Film 'Indu Sarkar' on Grounds of Maintainability. Petitioner's claim as biological daughter of Sanjay Gandhi does not confer locus standi to challenge film certification under...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Tenders for Supplementary Nutrition Under ICDS Scheme — Violation of Natural Justice and Arbitrary State Action. Tender cancellation without notice to petitioners and without valid ...