Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Gratuitous Passenger in Goods Vehicle Not Covered by Insurance Policy. The court held that the insurer is not liable for death of a gratuitous passenger travelling in a goods vehicle, but the appeal was dismissed as the insurance company failed to prove breach of policy terms.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 91
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal by New India Assurance Company Ltd. against the judgment and order dated 27.09.1999 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur in Claim Petition No.455 of 1993. The appellant was the insurance company arrayed as respondent No.3 in the trial court. The only ground of challenge was that the vehicle in which the deceased was travelling was a goods vehicle, and the deceased was proceeding as a gratuitous licensee along with 7 to 8 members of a marriage party. The appellant contended that the liability cannot be fastened on the insurance company as the deceased was a gratuitous passenger not permitted to travel in a goods vehicle. The appellant had taken a specific plea in its written statement, but the trial court did not frame an issue or give a finding on that point. The appellant argued that there was an admission by witness Rameshwar Lonkar that the matador was a goods vehicle. However, the court noted that the appellant failed to prove that the deceased was a gratuitous passenger and that there was a breach of the policy terms. The appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Gratuitous Passenger - Goods Vehicle - Section 147 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The issue was whether the insurer is liable for death of a gratuitous passenger in a goods vehicle. The court held that the insurer is not liable as the policy does not cover such passengers, but the appeal was dismissed because the insurance company failed to prove that the deceased was a gratuitous passenger and that there was a breach of policy terms. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation for the death of a gratuitous passenger travelling in a goods vehicle.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed.

Law Points

  • Insurance liability
  • gratuitous passenger
  • goods vehicle
  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 147
  • breach of policy terms
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (06) 193

First Appeal No.155 of 2004

2017-06-06

Smt. Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J.

Shri A.J. Pophaly for Appellant; None for Respondents

New India Assurance Company Ltd.

Smt. Kalabai wd/o Mahadeo Shirpurkar and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against judgment of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarding compensation for death in a motor accident.

Remedy Sought

Insurance company sought to avoid liability on the ground that deceased was a gratuitous passenger in a goods vehicle.

Filing Reason

Insurance company challenged the Tribunal's order holding it liable to pay compensation.

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur passed judgment and order dated 27.09.1999 in Claim Petition No.455 of 1993.

Issues

Whether the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation for the death of a gratuitous passenger travelling in a goods vehicle?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the vehicle was a goods vehicle and deceased was a gratuitous passenger, hence no liability under the policy. Appellant contended that specific plea was taken in written statement but trial court did not consider it.

Ratio Decidendi

The insurer is not liable for death of a gratuitous passenger in a goods vehicle, but the appeal was dismissed as the insurance company failed to prove that the deceased was a gratuitous passenger and that there was a breach of policy terms.

Judgment Excerpts

The only ground on which the impugned judgment and order is challenged is that the vehicle in which the deceased was travelling was a goods vehicle, and deceased was proceeding therein as a gratuitous licencee along with 7 to 8 members of the marriage party. The submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that despite specific plea being raised by the appellant in its written statement, the Trial Court has not considered the same; no issue to that effect is framed nor any finding is given about the same.

Procedural History

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur passed judgment and order dated 27.09.1999 in Claim Petition No.455 of 1993. The Insurance Company filed First Appeal No.155 of 2004 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. The appeal was dismissed on 06.06.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 147
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Direction for Payment of Rent During Pendency of Eviction Appeals Under Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961. The court interpreted Section 13 to allow appellate courts to impose conditions like payment of...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Application for Clarification in AMIE Degree Equivalence Case. Institution of Mechanical Engineers (India) Cannot Claim Its Associate Membership Certificate as Equivalent to a Degree in Engineering Without UGC or AICTE Approva...