Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Death of Minor — Notional Income Applied Under Motor Vehicles Act. Compensation Enhanced from Rs. 1,05,000 to Rs. 1,55,000 for Death of 17-Year-Old Boy Due to Rash Driving of Luxury Bus.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the original claimants, the mother and minor brothers of the deceased Premsagar, who died in a motor vehicle accident on 12/11/2001. The deceased, aged 17, was traveling on a Kinetic Honda scooter with his father when a luxury bus coming from the opposite side dashed into them, causing both deaths. The claimants sought compensation of Rs. 4,00,000, alleging that the deceased earned Rs. 1,200 per month working at a Xerox centre. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Akola, in M.A.C.P. No. 23/2002, awarded Rs. 1,05,000 with interest at 6% per annum. The claimants appealed for enhancement. The High Court found that the Tribunal's assessment of income at Rs. 1,200 per month was based on uncorroborated oral evidence and was not reliable. Instead, the Court applied a notional income of Rs. 15,000 per annum as per the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for a non-earning person. Applying a multiplier of 15 and deducting 1/3rd for personal expenses, the loss of dependency was calculated as Rs. 1,50,000. Adding Rs. 5,000 for funeral expenses, the total compensation was enhanced to Rs. 1,55,000. The Court directed the insurance company to pay the enhanced amount with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition. The appeal was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation for Death of Minor - Notional Income - The Tribunal erred in assessing the deceased's income at Rs. 1200 per month based on uncorroborated oral evidence; the High Court applied a notional income of Rs. 15,000 per annum as per Second Schedule to the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for a non-earning person, and applied multiplier of 15, deducting 1/3rd for personal expenses, resulting in enhanced compensation. (Paras 6-10)

B) Motor Accident Claims - Multiplier - Dependency - For a deceased minor aged 17 years, the appropriate multiplier is 15 as per the Second Schedule; deduction of 1/3rd towards personal expenses is standard; loss of dependency calculated as (Rs. 15,000 - 1/3rd) x 15 = Rs. 1,50,000, plus Rs. 5,000 for funeral expenses, total Rs. 1,55,000. (Paras 8-10)

C) Motor Accident Claims - Interest - The enhanced compensation amount shall carry interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization, as per the Tribunal's rate. (Para 10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal for the death of a 17-year-old boy was just and proper, and what should be the correct assessment of notional income and multiplier.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The compensation is enhanced from Rs. 1,05,000 to Rs. 1,55,000. The respondent no.2 insurance company shall pay the enhanced amount with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization. The award of the Tribunal is modified accordingly.

Law Points

  • Notional income assessment for deceased minor
  • multiplier method for compensation
  • deduction for personal expenses
  • loss of dependency calculation
  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988 Sections 166 and 168
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (06) 182

First Appeal No. 137/2004

2017-06-09

Dr. S.S. Phansalkar-Joshi, J.

Shri C.A. Joshi for the appellants, Shri A.J. Pophaly for the respondent no.2

Smt. Chandabai Wd/o Gautam Wankhede and others

Laxmandas s/o Gullumal Fulwani (dead) through L.Rs. and The New India Insurance Company Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal seeking enhancement of compensation for death of minor in motor vehicle accident.

Remedy Sought

Appellants (claimants) sought enhancement of compensation from Rs. 1,05,000 to Rs. 4,00,000 for the death of Premsagar.

Filing Reason

Claimants were aggrieved by the inadequate compensation awarded by the Tribunal for the death of the deceased in a motor vehicle accident.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Akola, in M.A.C.P. No. 23/2002, awarded Rs. 1,05,000 with interest at 6% per annum.

Issues

Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was just and proper? What should be the correct assessment of notional income and multiplier for a deceased minor?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the Tribunal erred in assessing the deceased's income at Rs. 1,200 per month based on uncorroborated oral evidence and that the compensation was inadequate. Respondent insurance company supported the Tribunal's award.

Ratio Decidendi

For a deceased minor with no established income, notional income of Rs. 15,000 per annum as per Second Schedule of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, is to be applied. Multiplier of 15 is appropriate for age 17. Deduction of 1/3rd for personal expenses is standard. Loss of dependency = (Rs. 15,000 - 1/3rd) x 15 = Rs. 1,50,000. Funeral expenses Rs. 5,000. Total compensation Rs. 1,55,000.

Judgment Excerpts

The Tribunal has assessed the income of the deceased at Rs.1200/ per month on the basis of oral evidence of the owner of Xerox Centre, which is not corroborated by any documentary evidence. In the absence of any reliable evidence, the notional income of the deceased can be assessed at Rs.15,000/ per annum as per the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act. Applying multiplier of 15 and deducting 1/3rd towards personal expenses, the loss of dependency comes to Rs.1,50,000/. The appeal is partly allowed. The compensation is enhanced from Rs.1,05,000/ to Rs.1,55,000/.

Procedural History

The claimants filed M.A.C.P. No. 23/2002 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Akola, which awarded Rs. 1,05,000 on 07/10/2003. Aggrieved, the claimants filed First Appeal No. 137/2004 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which was heard and decided on 09/06/2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Sections 166, 168
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Compensation in Police Custodial Death Case — State Directed to Pay ₹10 Lakhs for Negligence and Violation of Article 21. Failure to Provide Timely Medical Aid to Detainee Constitutes Custodial Violence ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Sets Aside Land Acquisition Declaration for Violation of Section 5-A Hearing Requirement. Failure to Provide Notice of Hearing Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Renders Section 6 Declaration Invalid.