Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Seeking Salary for Assistant Teacher in Ashram School Due to Disputed Facts. Mandamus cannot be issued when appointment was on honorarium basis and approval not granted.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 57
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Manjusha Umesh Ghodele, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to pay her salary on the post of Assistant Teacher from the date of her appointment i.e. 24.07.2000 till the filing of the petition on 21.01.2002. She was appointed in an Ashram School run by the respondents. However, the respondents contended that her appointment was not regular but on an honorarium of Rs.2,500 per month, restricted to the academic year 1999-2000. In the year 2000-01, the petitioner refused to accept the honorarium with unreasonable demands. The petitioner did not produce any order of appointment to show the nature of appointment or salary payable. Approval to her appointment was also not granted. She was out of employment since 12.01.2002. The court observed that various disputed questions of fact were involved, such as the nature of appointment and the terms of payment. Since the petitioner failed to produce the appointment order and the facts were disputed, the court held that it was not possible to issue a writ of mandamus directing payment of salary in the scale of pay. The petition was dismissed, rule discharged, and no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Disputed Questions of Fact - The petitioner sought direction to pay salary on the post of Assistant Teacher from the date of appointment. The court held that since the appointment was on honorarium of Rs.2,500 per month and not regular, and the petitioner did not produce appointment order, there were disputed questions of fact which cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction. Hence, mandamus cannot be issued. (Paras 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued directing payment of salary in the scale of pay when the appointment was on honorarium basis and there are disputed questions of fact.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Mandamus
  • Disputed questions of fact
  • Writ jurisdiction
  • Appointment on honorarium
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (06) 135

WRIT PETITION NO. 763 OF 2002

2017-06-28

R. K. DESHPANDE, Mrs. SWAPNA JOSHI

Shri J.L.Bhoot for Petitioner, Shri S.M.Ukey, Addl. Govt. Pleader for Respondent no.3

Smt. Manjusha Umesh Ghodele

Gram Vikas Mandal, Karanja (Ghadge) through its President Smt. K.S.Chopde; Shri Sant Bhakre Maharaj Ashram Shala, Devwadi (Sarwadi) through its Head Mistress; Special District Social Welfare Officer, Wardha; Hansa Krida Nyas Prasarak Mandal, Pimpalkhuta through its President/Secretary

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction to pay salary to the petitioner as Assistant Teacher.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to pay salary to the petitioner on the post of Assistant Teacher from the date of appointment i.e. 24.07.2000 till filing of petition on 21.01.2002.

Filing Reason

Non-payment of salary for the post of Assistant Teacher.

Issues

Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued directing payment of salary in the scale of pay when the appointment was on honorarium basis and there are disputed questions of fact.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner sought salary as Assistant Teacher from date of appointment. Respondents contended appointment was on honorarium of Rs.2,500 per month, not regular, and petitioner refused honorarium with unreasonable demands.

Ratio Decidendi

When there are disputed questions of fact regarding the nature of appointment and salary, a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to direct payment of salary in a particular scale.

Judgment Excerpts

In such a situation, various disputed questions of fact are involved and it is, therefore, not possible for us to issue mandamus to the respondents to pay the salary to the petitioner in the scale of pay available to the post of Assistant Teacher.

Procedural History

Petition filed on 21.01.2002; replies filed; heard and dismissed on 28.06.2017.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Seeking Salary for Assistant Teacher in Ashram School Due to Disputed Facts. Mandamus cannot be issued when appointment was on honorarium basis and approval not granted.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Will Partially Valid Under Portuguese Civil Code. Testamentary Succession by Bachelor Not Subject to Disposable Quota; Will Disposing More Than Testator's Share Is Not Wholly Void but ...