Supreme Court Clarifies Remarks on Judicial Integrity in Allahabad High Court — Application for Expunging Remarks Dismissed. Court emphasized that remarks were not against all judges but acknowledged issues with certain judges' conduct.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court addressed an application seeking to expunge remarks made in its judgment dated 26.11.2010 concerning the Allahabad High Court. The court acknowledged the historical significance and integrity of the Allahabad High Court, noting the contributions of its judges to the independence struggle. It clarified that its previous order did not label all judges as corrupt but referred to complaints against certain judges, emphasizing that many judges uphold high standards of integrity. The court expressed its deep connection to the High Court and the pain caused by recent distressing orders. It rejected claims that its observations were sweeping or damaging to the institution's reputation, asserting that true damage arises from unacceptable behavior by some members. The court urged the judges of the Allahabad High Court to reflect on the situation rather than react defensively. Ultimately, the application was disposed of with a reiteration of the court's respect for the diligent judges of the High Court.

Headnote

A) Judicial Integrity - Remarks on Judges - Clarification of Remarks - Not Applicable - The court clarified that its previous remarks did not imply that all judges of the Allahabad High Court were corrupt, but acknowledged complaints against certain judges. The court emphasized the need for introspection among judges rather than mere reaction to the remarks made (Paras 3-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the remarks made in the judgment dated 26.11.2010 were sweeping and damaging to the reputation of the Allahabad High Court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application was disposed of with clarifications regarding the remarks made in the previous judgment, emphasizing that not all judges were implicated in corruption.

Law Points

  • Judicial integrity
  • Expunging remarks
  • Reputation of judiciary
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (SC) (12) 32

I. A. NO. 2 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No. 31797 of 2010

2010-12-10

Markandey Katju, Gyan Sudha Misra

Raja Khan

U.P. Sunni Central Waqf Board & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for expunging remarks made in a previous judgment.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to expunge certain remarks from the judgment.

Filing Reason

Allegations that remarks damaged the reputation of the Allahabad High Court.

Previous Decisions

Judgment dated 26.11.2010 made remarks about certain judges of the Allahabad High Court.

Issues

Whether the remarks were sweeping and damaging to the reputation of the Allahabad High Court

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the remarks were sweeping and damaging. Court clarified that the remarks did not imply all judges were corrupt.

Ratio Decidendi

The court clarified that its remarks were not intended to malign all judges but to address issues with certain judges, emphasizing the importance of integrity in the judiciary.

Judgment Excerpts

It is therefore totally false to say that all Judges of the Allahabad High Court are corrupt. We do not mean to say that all lawyers who have close relations as Judges of the High Court are misusing that relationship.

Procedural History

The application was filed after the judgment dated 26.11.2010, seeking to clarify and expunge certain remarks made therein.

Acts & Sections

  • Not Applicable:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Section 80IA(4) Deduction Case for Warehousing Corporation. Assessee's warehousing facility held to be part of port infrastructure eligible for deduction under Income Tax Act, 1961.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Juvenile in Criminal Case — Amendment to Juvenile Justice Act Recognized. The court recognized the appellant's juvenile status due to an amendment in the Juvenile Justice Act, leading to the allowance of the appeal an...