Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case — Conviction Restored Under Section 304-B IPC. Presumption under Section 113-B Evidence Act applied as death occurred within seven years of marriage and dowry demand was proved; acquittal set aside as perverse.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 12
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 131 of 1996, acquitting the respondents (original accused) of offences under Sections 304-B, 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The case arose from the death of one Sunita, who was married to respondent No. 1 Kailas Gore on 15th May 1994. Within about one year of marriage, on 15th April 1995, Sunita died due to burn injuries. The prosecution alleged that the respondents, including the husband and his relatives, demanded a motorcycle and cash from the deceased's father, and subjected her to cruelty and harassment for non-fulfillment of the dowry demand. The trial court acquitted all accused, holding that the prosecution failed to prove the demand of dowry soon before death and that the death was not proved to be otherwise than under normal circumstances. The State appealed. The High Court examined the evidence of PW-1 (father of deceased) and PW-2 (brother), who consistently deposed about the dowry demand and harassment. The court noted that the death occurred within seven years of marriage and there was evidence of dowry demand soon before death. Applying the presumption under Section 113-B of the Evidence Act, the court held that the trial court's acquittal was perverse as it ignored the mandatory presumption and gave undue weight to minor contradictions. The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the acquittal, and convicted the respondents under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The respondents were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years under Section 304-B, two years under Section 498-A, and one year under each of the Dowry Prohibition Act offences, with all sentences to run concurrently.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Dowry Death - Section 304-B IPC - Presumption under Section 113-B Evidence Act - Once it is proved that death of a woman occurred within seven years of marriage and there was demand of dowry soon before death, the court shall presume that such person caused the dowry death - The trial court's acquittal based on minor contradictions and ignoring the presumption was perverse - Held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt (Paras 10-15).

B) Criminal Law - Cruelty by Husband or Relatives - Section 498-A IPC - Demand of dowry and harassment - The evidence of PW-1 (father of deceased) and PW-2 (brother) clearly established that the deceased was subjected to cruelty and harassment for dowry soon before her death - The trial court erred in discarding their testimony on trivial grounds - Held that the conviction under Section 498-A IPC is sustainable (Paras 16-18).

C) Evidence Law - Presumption as to Dowry Death - Section 113-B Evidence Act - The presumption is mandatory and shifts the burden of proof on the accused - The respondents failed to rebut the presumption - The trial court's failure to apply the presumption vitiated the acquittal - Held that the appeal must be allowed (Paras 12-14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial court's acquittal of the respondents for offences under Sections 304-B, 498-A IPC and Sections 3, 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act was perverse and liable to be set aside.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. The judgment and order of acquittal passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No. 131 of 1996 is set aside. The respondents are convicted under Sections 304-B and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They are sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for seven years under Section 304-B, two years under Section 498-A, and one year under each of the Dowry Prohibition Act offences. All sentences to run concurrently.

Law Points

  • Dowry death
  • presumption under Section 113-B Evidence Act
  • death within seven years of marriage
  • demand of dowry
  • cruelty
  • perverse acquittal
  • appellate court's power to reverse acquittal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (06) 93

Criminal Appeal No. 81 of 2000

2017-06-23

S.S. Shinde, S.M. Gavhane

Mr. S.D. Ghayal (APP for appellant), Mr. N.S. Ghanekar (Advocate for respondents)

State of Maharashtra

Kailas s/o Walmik Gore and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against acquittal in a dowry death case

Remedy Sought

State sought setting aside of acquittal and conviction of respondents for offences under Sections 304-B, 498-A IPC and Sections 3, 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act

Filing Reason

Trial court acquitted the accused despite evidence of dowry demand and death within seven years of marriage

Previous Decisions

Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad acquitted all accused in Sessions Case No. 131 of 1996

Issues

Whether the trial court's acquittal was perverse and liable to be set aside? Whether the prosecution proved the demand of dowry soon before the death of the deceased? Whether the presumption under Section 113-B of the Evidence Act was rightly applied?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (State): The trial court ignored the presumption under Section 113-B Evidence Act and gave undue weight to minor contradictions; the evidence of PW-1 and PW-2 clearly established dowry demand and harassment soon before death. Respondents (accused): The prosecution failed to prove the demand of dowry soon before death; the death was accidental and not due to dowry harassment; the trial court correctly acquitted them.

Ratio Decidendi

Once it is proved that the death of a woman occurred within seven years of marriage and there was demand of dowry soon before her death, the court shall presume under Section 113-B of the Evidence Act that the person who demanded dowry caused the dowry death. The trial court's acquittal ignoring this presumption and based on minor contradictions is perverse and liable to be reversed by the appellate court.

Judgment Excerpts

The trial court has not properly appreciated the evidence on record and has ignored the presumption under Section 113-B of the Evidence Act. The death of Sunita occurred within seven years of her marriage and there is evidence on record to show that soon before her death she was subjected to cruelty and harassment in connection with demand of dowry. In the light of the above discussion, we are of the considered view that the impugned judgment and order of acquittal is perverse and liable to be set aside.

Procedural History

The trial court (Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad) acquitted the respondents in Sessions Case No. 131 of 1996. The State of Maharashtra filed Criminal Appeal No. 81 of 2000 before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) challenging the acquittal. The appeal was reserved on 20.06.2017 and pronounced on 23.06.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 304-B, 498-A
  • Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961: 3, 4
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 113-B
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Dowry Demand and Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Sections 302, 498-A read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty or dowry...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case — Conviction Restored Under Section 304-B IPC. Presumption under Section 113-B Evidence Act applied as death occurred within seven years of marriage and dowry demand was pr...