Bombay High Court Allows Substitution of Legal Heirs in Pending Writ Petition — Procedural Order for Bringing Legal Representatives on Record. The court permitted the applicant to bring legal heirs of deceased respondent on record under Order XXII CPC, directing amendment within two weeks and listing the matter for fresh admission.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This is a procedural order passed by the Bombay High Court in a civil application filed in a pending writ petition. The applicant, Abdul Rashid Bhikan Tamboli, who was the original petitioner in Writ Petition No.6640 of 2015, sought to bring the legal heirs of the deceased respondent No.2 on record. The court heard the counsel for the applicant and the proposed legal representatives. Finding the averments in the application sufficient, the court allowed the application in terms of prayer clause (a), directed that amendment be carried out within two weeks from the date of uploading of the order, and listed the writ petition for fresh admission on 26.07.2017. The order was passed by a division bench comprising Justice A.S. Oka and Justice Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi on 16th June 2017.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Substitution of Legal Representatives - Order XXII Rule 3 CPC - Application for bringing legal heirs of deceased respondent on record - Court allowed the application in terms of prayer clause (a) and granted two weeks for amendment - Held that the application was allowed based on averments made therein (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the application for bringing legal heirs of deceased respondent on record should be allowed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from date of uploading of order. Writ Petition to be placed on 26.07.2017 under caption 'Fresh Admission'.

Law Points

  • Order XXII CPC
  • substitution of legal representatives
  • abatement
  • limitation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (06) 37

Civil Application No.1519 of 2016 in Writ Petition No.6640 of 2015

2017-06-16

A.S. Oka, Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi

2017:BHC-AS:15226-DB

Mr. Y.G. Thorat with Mr. Ashok B. Tajane for Applicant/Org.Petitioner, Mr. A. R. Shaikh for the proposed legal representatives of the respondent no.2

Abdul Rashid Bhikan Tamboli

Chief Officer Manmad Municipal Council & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil application for bringing legal heirs of deceased respondent on record in a pending writ petition.

Remedy Sought

Applicant sought to bring legal heirs of deceased respondent No.2 on record.

Filing Reason

Death of respondent No.2 during pendency of writ petition necessitated substitution of legal representatives.

Issues

Whether the application for bringing legal heirs of deceased respondent on record should be allowed.

Submissions/Arguments

Counsel for applicant argued in support of the application; counsel for proposed legal representatives appeared.

Ratio Decidendi

An application for substitution of legal heirs of a deceased party may be allowed if the averments made therein are sufficient and no objection is raised.

Judgment Excerpts

In view of averments made in the application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks from the date on which this order is uploaded. Place Writ Petition on 26.07.2017 under the caption 'Fresh Admission'.

Procedural History

The original writ petition (Writ Petition No.6640 of 2015) was filed by Abdul Rashid Bhikan Tamboli against Chief Officer Manmad Municipal Council and others. During its pendency, respondent No.2 died. The applicant filed Civil Application No.1519 of 2016 to bring the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.2 on record. The application was heard and allowed on 16.06.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC): Order XXII Rule 3
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Substitution of Legal Heirs in Pending Writ Petition — Procedural Order for Bringing Legal Representatives on Record. The court permitted the applicant to bring legal heirs of deceased respondent on record under Order XXII ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Insurance Company Held Liable Despite Bus Being Under Corporation's Control. The Court distinguished earlier precedent and held that under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the insurance compan...