Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Nomenclature of Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department as Cause Ceases to Exist. Petitioner's Counsel Submits No Live Controversy, Leading to Disposal Without Adjudication on Merits.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 153
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, S. Marimuthu, filed two writ petitions before the Madras High Court. In W.P.No.32354 of 2019, he sought a declaration that Government Orders G.O.No.816 dated 25/03/1992 and G.O.(2D) No.2 dated 24/01/2007, and any other related orders, were ultra vires the Constitution of India and null and void. He also sought a direction to rename the 'Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department' as 'Pattiyal Sathigal Nalathurai' (Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Welfare Department) in accordance with constitutional schemes. In W.P.No.34643 of 2019, he challenged a Letter No.2298/Cv1/2012 dated 6.1.2014 along with a Committee Report, seeking to quash them as ultra vires and to direct the respondents to use the correct constitutional translation. The respondents included the Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of Tamil Nadu, and others. When the matters were taken up for hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. P. Vijendran, submitted that the cause does not exist as of now. In view of this submission, the court held that no further adjudication was required and disposed of both writ petitions without costs. The connected miscellaneous petition was also closed.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Nomenclature of Government Department - Cause of Action - Petitioner challenged the translation of 'Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Welfare Department' as 'Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department' - Petitioner's counsel submitted that cause does not exist as of now - Held that no further adjudication is required and writ petitions are disposed of (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the writ petitions challenging the nomenclature of the Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department survive when the petitioner's counsel submits that cause does not exist.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both writ petitions disposed of as cause does not exist. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Law Points

  • Cause of action
  • Disposal of writ petition when cause ceases to exist
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (06) 85

W.P.Nos.32354 and 34643 of 2019 and W.M.P.No.46278 of 2025

2026-06-15

S.M.Subramaniam, N.Senthilkumar

Mr.P.Vijendran (for petitioner), Ms.P.J.Anitha CGSC (for R1 & R2), Dr.R.Gouri (for R3 & R4), Mr.R.Prathaban (for R5), Mr.K.Thilageswaran (for R6)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the nomenclature of a government department and seeking correct translation as per constitutional terms.

Remedy Sought

Declaration that certain Government Orders are ultra vires and direction to rename the department as 'Pattiyal Sathigal Nalathurai' (Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Welfare Department).

Filing Reason

Petitioner aggrieved by the use of 'Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department' instead of the constitutional term 'Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Welfare Department'.

Issues

Whether the writ petitions survive when the petitioner's counsel submits that cause does not exist.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel submitted that cause does not exist as of now.

Ratio Decidendi

When the petitioner's counsel submits that cause does not exist, no further adjudication is required and the writ petition is disposed of.

Judgment Excerpts

When these matters are taken up for hearing, Mr.P.Vijendran, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that cause does not exist as of now. In view of the above submission, no further adjudication is required. Consequently, both Writ Petitions are disposed of.

Procedural History

Writ petitions filed in 2019; impleadment of R5 on 15.06.2026; heard and disposed of on 15.06.2026.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Directs Issuance of Scheduled Tribe Certificate in Central Government Format for Apprenticeship in Bank of Baroda. The Court directed the Mamlatdar & Executive Magistrate to decide the pending application within two weeks, consider...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Nomenclature of Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department as Cause Ceases to Exist. Petitioner's Counsel Submits No Live Controversy, Leading to Disposal Without Adjudication on Merits.