Madras High Court Quashes Eviction Notice Against Residents in Municipal Land Dispute — Directs Consideration of Representation for House Site Pattas. Section 128 of Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 requires notice to specify period for compliance and consequences of failure, which was not done.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present writ petition was instituted by 14 petitioners, residents of Periyar Nagar, Thazhaiyatham Puthiya Colony, Gudiyatham, challenging an eviction notice dated 29.11.2023 issued by the Commissioner, Gudiyatham Municipality, under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998, along with consequential notices dated 02.02.2026. The petitioners sought to quash these notices and direct the respondents to grant house site patta in T.S.No.792/57. The court examined the impugned notice and found that it did not specify the period within which the petitioners were required to comply with the notice and the consequences of failure to comply, as required under Section 128 of the Act. The court held that the notice was not in conformity with the statutory requirements and therefore quashed the same. However, the court granted liberty to the respondents to issue a fresh notice in accordance with law. The court also directed the petitioners to submit a representation to the respondents for grant of house site patta, and directed the respondents to consider such representation in accordance with law. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law - Eviction Notice - Section 128 Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 - Validity of Notice - The court considered whether the eviction notice issued by the Commissioner, Gudiyatham Municipality, complied with the requirements of Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998. The court held that the notice did not specify the period within which the petitioners were required to comply and the consequences of failure, and therefore quashed the notice. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the eviction notice issued under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 is valid and in conformity with the statutory requirements.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the impugned eviction notice dated 29.11.2023 and consequential notices dated 02.02.2026, with liberty to the respondents to issue a fresh notice in accordance with law. The court also directed the petitioners to submit a representation for grant of house site patta, and directed the respondents to consider such representation in accordance with law. The writ petition was disposed of.

Law Points

  • Section 128 of Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act
  • 1998 requires notice to specify period for compliance and consequences of failure
  • Notice must be in conformity with statutory requirements
  • Writ petition maintainable against illegal eviction notice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (02) 47

WP No. 7362 of 2026 and WMP No. 7913 & 7915 of 2026

2026-02-24

S. M. Subramaniam, C. Kumarappan

MR.B.Lenin Balu, Mr.D.Ravichander, Ms.S.Indhu Bala

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging eviction notice and seeking grant of house site patta.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of eviction notice dated 29.11.2023 and consequential notices dated 02.02.2026, and direction to respondents to grant house site patta in T.S.No.792/57.

Filing Reason

Petitioners were issued an eviction notice under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998, which they alleged was not in conformity with statutory requirements.

Issues

Whether the eviction notice issued under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 is valid and in conformity with the statutory requirements.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the eviction notice did not specify the period for compliance and consequences of failure. Respondents submitted that the notice was valid and in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi

An eviction notice under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 must specify the period within which the person is required to comply and the consequences of failure to comply. Failure to do so renders the notice invalid.

Judgment Excerpts

The present writ petition has been instituted challenging the notice issued by the Commissioner, Gudiyatham Municipality, under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998. An eviction order came to be issued on earlier occasion in Na.Ka.No, 1769/2023/F-1 dated 29.11.2023 by the 3rd respondent along with the consequential notices dated 02.02.2026.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed on an unspecified date, challenging the eviction notice dated 29.11.2023 and consequential notices dated 02.02.2026. The court heard the matter and disposed of it on 24.02.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998: 128
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against APMC Dismissal Due to Alternative Remedy of Second Appeal Under Rule 104 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules, 1967. Court holds that Rule 103 prescribes procedure for imposing penaltie...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Maharashtra Police Act Externment Case — Externment Order Not Proved. Conviction under Section 142 of Maharashtra Police Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove the externment order and independent witnesse...