Madras High Court Allows Writ of Mandamus Against Encroachment on Public Road — Authorities Directed to Remove Encroachments After Following Due Process. The court held that once encroachments are identified through survey, the authorities must initiate enforcement action and evict encroachers after affording them an opportunity of hearing.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mir Ziauddin, filed a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court, seeking a direction to the third and fourth respondents (Village Administrative Officers of Enjambakkam and Sholinganallur Villages) to restore the original road by removing the deviation and illegal encroachment allegedly made by the fifth respondent (since deceased, represented by respondents 6 to 9) in front of the petitioner's land situated in Survey No.287, Injambakkam Village, Saidapet Division, now Sholinganallur Taluk. The petitioner contended that the contesting respondents had encroached upon the public road, and despite complaints, the authorities failed to act. The Tahsildar, Sholinganallur, filed a counter affidavit stating that inspection and survey were conducted and encroachments on the road were identified. The learned counsel for respondents 6 to 9 argued that they had not encroached upon public land. The court, after considering the submissions, observed that since the authorities had conducted inspection and survey and identified encroachments on the public road, they were bound to initiate enforcement action by following the proceedings contemplated under the relevant statutes and rules. The court directed that opportunities be afforded to the encroachers, and thereafter, the encroachers be evicted from the public road or government lands. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to initiate action and remove encroachments within a period of eight weeks, after following due process of law.

Headnote

A) Public Law - Writ of Mandamus - Encroachment on Public Road - Authorities Duty - The petitioner sought direction to remove encroachment on public road. The court held that once encroachments are identified through inspection and survey, the authorities are bound to initiate enforcement action following statutory procedure, including affording opportunity to encroachers before eviction. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the authorities are bound to remove encroachments on public road after identification through survey, and whether the writ of mandamus is maintainable for such direction.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to initiate action and remove encroachments within a period of eight weeks, after following due process of law and affording opportunity to the encroachers.

Law Points

  • Writ of Mandamus
  • Encroachment on public road
  • Duty of authorities to remove encroachments
  • Opportunity of hearing to encroachers
  • Eviction from government land
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (03) 250

WP No. 13467 of 2021

2026-03-13

S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender

2026:MHC:1075

Mr.B.Divakaran for Petitioner; Mr.T.Arun kumar, AGP for R1 to R4; Mr.Sandeep Shah for Mr.Bhaghyamchari for R6

Mir Ziauddin

The District Collector, Chennai District; The Thasildar, Sholinganallur Taluk; The Village Administrative Officer, Enjambakkam Village; The Village Administrative Officer, Sholinganallur Village; T.G.Gopinathan (Deceased); P.G.Sobha; Nithin Gopinath; Naveen Gopinath; Nirmal Gopinath

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct authorities to remove encroachment on public road.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents 3 and 4 to restore the original road by removing deviation and illegal encroachment by the 5th respondent in front of petitioner's land.

Filing Reason

Alleged encroachment on public road by contesting respondents and failure of authorities to act on complaints.

Issues

Whether the authorities are bound to remove encroachments on public road after identification through survey? Whether the writ of mandamus is maintainable for direction to remove encroachments?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: Contesting respondents have encroached upon public road; complaints not addressed. Respondents 6-9: They have not encroached upon public land. Tahsildar: Inspection and survey conducted; encroachments identified.

Ratio Decidendi

Once encroachments on public road are identified through inspection and survey, the authorities are bound to initiate enforcement action by following statutory procedure, including affording opportunity to encroachers, and thereafter evict them from public road or government lands.

Judgment Excerpts

The authorities, since conducted inspection and survey and identified the encroachments in public road, they are bound to initiate enforcement action by following the proceedings as contemplated under the relevant statues and rules in force. Opportunities are to be afforded to the encroachers and thereafter, the encroachers are to be evicted from the public road or government lands.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed WP No. 13467 of 2021 before the Madras High Court. The court heard the matter and disposed it on 13-03-2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Returning Officer in Election Forgery Case. Lack of Prima Facie Case Under Sections 464, 465, 468, 470, 471, 472, 473 IPC Read with 34 IPC Leads to Quashing of Criminal Proceedings.
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Writ of Mandamus Against Encroachment on Public Road — Authorities Directed to Remove Encroachments After Following Due Process. The court held that once encroachments are identified through survey, the authorities must ini...