Gujarat High Court Directs Passport Renewal for Accused in NDPS Case Despite Pending Trial — Bail Condition Does Not Bar Renewal. The court held that the passport authority must process the renewal application without insisting on a no-objection certificate from the trial court, as the trial court had already permitted renewal subject to conditions.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 89
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mayank Girishbhai Shah, filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 14, 21, and 226 of the Constitution read with the Passports Act, 1967, seeking a direction to the Regional Passport Officer to process his passport renewal application. The petitioner was facing trial in NDPS Case No. 10/2022 pending before the 3rd Additional District Judge, Ahmedabad, and had been enlarged on bail by the 2nd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad, vide order dated 09.03.2023 in Criminal Misc. Application No. 733 of 2023. One of the bail conditions required the petitioner to surrender his passport and not leave India without prior court approval. The passport was due to expire on 13.08.2025. The petitioner moved an application before the trial court for renewal, which was partly allowed vide order dated 02.05.2025 in Criminal Misc. Application No. 1336/2025. Pursuant to that order, the petitioner obtained his passport from the Investigating Officer and applied for renewal (Application No. AH1070977272825). The passport authority refused to process the application, stating that a no-objection certificate from the trial court was required. The petitioner argued that the trial court had already permitted renewal and that the authority should process the application without further impediment. The court, after hearing both sides, held that the passport authority must process the renewal application in accordance with law, without insisting on a no-objection certificate, as the trial court had already granted permission. The petition was allowed, and the respondent was directed to process the application within two weeks from the date of receipt of the order. The court also clarified that the petitioner must comply with all bail conditions and not leave India without prior court approval.

Headnote

A) Passports Act, 1967 - Section 6(2)(f) - Passport Renewal - Pending Criminal Trial - The court held that the pendency of a criminal trial does not automatically disentitle an applicant from obtaining a passport renewal; the authority must consider the application on its merits and in accordance with law, especially when the trial court has granted permission for renewal subject to conditions. (Paras 1-4)

B) Constitutional Law - Article 21 - Right to Travel - Bail Conditions - The court directed the passport authority to process the renewal application without insisting on a no-objection certificate from the trial court, as the trial court had already permitted renewal and the petitioner had complied with bail conditions. (Paras 3-4)

C) Criminal Procedure - Bail Conditions - Passport Surrender - The court noted that the bail condition requiring surrender of passport does not prohibit renewal; the passport was released by the investigating officer pursuant to trial court order, and the authority must process the application. (Paras 3-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Regional Passport Officer can refuse to process a passport renewal application solely on the ground that the applicant is facing a criminal trial, when the trial court has permitted renewal subject to conditions.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The respondent authority is directed to process the passport renewal application of the petitioner (Application No. AH1070977272825) in accordance with law, without insisting on a no-objection certificate from the trial court, within two weeks from the date of receipt of the order. The petitioner shall comply with all bail conditions and shall not leave India without prior approval of the trial court.

Law Points

  • Passports Act
  • 1967
  • Section 6(2)(f)
  • Passport renewal
  • Pending criminal trial
  • Bail conditions
  • Right to travel
  • Article 21
  • Article 14
  • Article 226
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 1020

R/Special Civil Application No. 3943 of 2026

2026-03-27

Hemant M. Prachchhak

2026:GUJHC:23467

Ronith Joy for the Petitioner, Pradip D. Bhate for the Respondent No. 1

Mayank Girishbhai Shah

Regional Passport Officer & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 14, 21, and 226 of the Constitution seeking direction to process passport renewal application.

Remedy Sought

Direction to the Regional Passport Officer to process the petitioner's passport renewal application (No. AH1070977272825) in accordance with law.

Filing Reason

The passport authority refused to process the renewal application on the ground that the petitioner is facing a criminal trial under NDPS Act.

Previous Decisions

The trial court partly allowed the petitioner's application for passport renewal vide order dated 02.05.2025 in Criminal Misc. Application No. 1336/2025.

Issues

Whether the passport authority can refuse to process a renewal application solely because the applicant is facing a criminal trial, when the trial court has permitted renewal subject to conditions. Whether the passport authority can insist on a no-objection certificate from the trial court despite the trial court having already granted permission for renewal.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel submitted that the trial court had permitted renewal and the passport was released by the investigating officer; the authority should process the application without insisting on a no-objection certificate. Respondent's counsel submitted that the authority requires a no-objection certificate from the trial court to process the renewal.

Ratio Decidendi

The pendency of a criminal trial does not automatically disentitle an applicant from obtaining a passport renewal; the passport authority must consider the application on its merits and in accordance with law, especially when the trial court has granted permission for renewal subject to conditions. The authority cannot insist on a no-objection certificate if the trial court has already permitted renewal.

Judgment Excerpts

Present petition is filed by the petitioner under Articles 14, 21 and 226 of the Constitution of India read with the provisions of the Passports Act, 1967 and Rules 1980 seeking following reliefs... He submits that the petitioner is facing trial vide NDPS Case No. 10/2022 which is pending before the 3rd Additional District Judge, Ahmedabad... He submits that the respondent authority refused to process the application stating that in order to process the application he has to...

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court on 27/03/2026. The court issued rule returnable forthwith, and with consent of parties, heard the matter finally. The petition was allowed on the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 14, Article 21, Article 226
  • Passports Act, 1967: Section 6(2)(f)
  • Passport Rules, 1980:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty and Unnatural Death. Conviction under Sections 304B, 498A IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 set aside as prosecution failed to prove ...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Directs Passport Renewal for Accused in NDPS Case Despite Pending Trial — Bail Condition Does Not Bar Renewal. The court held that the passport authority must process the renewal application without insisting on a no-objection ce...