Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition of Daily Wagers Seeking Regularisation and Pay Parity with Government Employees — Circulars dated 20/3/2020 and 11/9/1987 Not Applicable to Petitioners Who Were Not Appointed Under the Scheme.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 73
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Rajeshbhai Maheshbhai Jani and others, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the respondents (State of Gujarat and another) to treat their services up to 58 years of age and to provide them regular salary and allowances as government employees. They also sought quashing of a circular dated 16/7/2020 and implementation of circulars dated 20/3/2020 and 11/9/1987. The petitioners were appointed as daily wagers on an ad-hoc basis. The learned advocate for the petitioners, Mr. U.T. Mishra, candidly submitted that the principal grievance was covered by a decision of this Court. However, the Court noted that the petitioners were not appointed under any scheme and the circulars relied upon were not applicable to them. The Court held that the petitioners were not entitled to the reliefs sought and dismissed the petition. The Court also observed that the petitioners may approach the appropriate forum for any contractual disputes.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Daily Wagers - Regularisation - Petitioners appointed as daily wagers on ad-hoc basis sought regularisation and pay parity with government employees - Court held that the circulars dated 20/3/2020 and 11/9/1987 were not applicable to the petitioners as they were not appointed under any scheme - Petition dismissed (Paras 4-6).

B) Constitutional Law - Article 226 - Scope - Petitioners sought relief under Article 226 for enforcement of contractual rights - Court held that Article 226 is not a remedy for breach of contract and the petitioners must approach the appropriate forum for contractual disputes (Para 6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners, who were appointed as daily wagers on an ad-hoc basis, are entitled to be treated as government employees and to receive regular salary and benefits as per circulars dated 20/3/2020 and 11/9/1987.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. The petitioners may approach the appropriate forum for any contractual disputes.

Law Points

  • Daily wagers not entitled to regularisation or pay parity with government employees unless appointed under a specific scheme
  • Circulars dated 20/3/2020 and 11/9/1987 not applicable to daily wagers appointed on ad-hoc basis
  • Article 226 of Constitution of India not a remedy for contractual disputes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 171

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9072 of 2020

2026-03-03

MAULIK J.SHELAT

MR UT MISHRA FOR MR HK THAKOR, MS DHRUTI PANDYA

Rajesbhai Maheshbhai Jani & Ors.

State of Gujarat & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking regularisation and pay parity for daily wagers.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought directions to treat their services up to 58 years of age, provide regular salary and allowances, quash circular dated 16/7/2020, and implement circulars dated 20/3/2020 and 11/9/1987.

Filing Reason

Petitioners, appointed as daily wagers on ad-hoc basis, claimed they were entitled to be treated as government employees and receive regular salary and benefits.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to regularisation and pay parity with government employees. Whether the circulars dated 20/3/2020 and 11/9/1987 are applicable to the petitioners.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners' counsel submitted that the principal grievance is covered by a decision of this Court. State's counsel opposed the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

Daily wagers appointed on ad-hoc basis are not entitled to regularisation or pay parity with government employees unless appointed under a specific scheme. Circulars dated 20/3/2020 and 11/9/1987 are not applicable to such daily wagers.

Judgment Excerpts

At the outset, Mr.Mishra, learned advocate for the petitioners, would be candid in his submission that, so far as the principal grievance of the petitioners raised in this petition is concerned, it is squarely covered by the decision of this Court. The Court held that the circulars dated 20/3/2020 and 11/9/1987 were not applicable to the petitioners as they were not appointed under any scheme.

Procedural History

The petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Rule was issued and the matter was taken up for hearing with consent of the parties.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition of Daily Wagers Seeking Regularisation and Pay Parity with Government Employees — Circulars dated 20/3/2020 and 11/9/1987 Not Applicable to Petitioners Who Were Not Appointed Under the Scheme.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence and Corrected Multiplier. Deceased motorcyclist found 50% contributory negligent for being on wrong side; compensa...