Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sultan @Bala Hasan Shekh, was preventively detained by the Commissioner of Police, Surat, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985, as a 'dangerous person' as defined under Section 2(c) of the Act. The detention order was dated 20.11.2025. The detenue, through his brother Tokir Hasan Shekh, challenged the legality and validity of the order by way of a Special Criminal Application before the Gujarat High Court. The petitioner argued that there was no material available with the detention authority to indicate how public health, public order, or public tranquility was disturbed in any manner. It was further submitted that the order was passed without application of mind and mechanically. The learned APP opposed the petition, contending that the detenue was a habitual offender and his activities affected society at large, and that the detaining authority had considered his antecedents and past activities. The Court, after hearing both sides, examined the grounds of detention and found that the detaining authority had relied on registration of FIRs against the detenue. The Court held that the material on record did not show that the alleged activities of the detenue had disturbed or were likely to disturb public order. The Court observed that the detaining authority had mechanically passed the order without proper application of mind. Consequently, the Court allowed the petition, quashed the detention order, and directed the release of the detenue forthwith.

Headnote

A) Preventive Detention - Dangerous Person - Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 - Lack of Material - The detenue was preventively detained as a dangerous person based on registration of FIRs. The Court held that mere registration of FIRs does not constitute material to show that public order or public tranquility was disturbed. The detention order was passed mechanically without application of mind and was quashed. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the detention order passed under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985, branding the detenue as a 'dangerous person', is sustainable in the absence of material showing disturbance to public order or public tranquility.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The detention order dated 20.11.2025 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Surat, is quashed and set aside. The detenue is ordered to be set at liberty forthwith, if not required in any other case.

Law Points

  • Preventive detention
  • dangerous person
  • public order
  • subjective satisfaction
  • material on record
  • mechanical exercise of power
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (02) 1228

R/Special Criminal Application No. 1676 of 2026

2026-02-24

Honourable Mr. Justice Ilesh J. Vora, Honourable Mr. Justice R. T. Vachhani

2026:GUJHC:14622-DB

Mr. Nitinkumar V. Patel for the applicant, Mr. Ronak Raval, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the respondent

Sultan @Bala Hasan Shekh (through brother Tokir Hasan Shekh)

State of Gujarat & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to preventive detention order under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the detention order dated 20.11.2025 and release of the detenue.

Filing Reason

The detenue was preventively detained as a dangerous person without material showing disturbance to public order.

Issues

Whether the detention order is sustainable in the absence of material showing disturbance to public order or public tranquility.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that there was no material to indicate disturbance to public health, public order, or public tranquility; the order was passed mechanically without application of mind. Respondent argued that the detenue is a habitual offender and his activities affected society at large; the detaining authority considered antecedents and past activities.

Ratio Decidendi

Preventive detention under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985, requires material to show that the alleged activities of the detenue disturbed or were likely to disturb public order. Mere registration of FIRs does not constitute such material, and a detention order passed mechanically without application of mind is unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

there was no material available with the detention authority to indicate as to how the public health or public order or public tranquility was disturbed in any manner. the impugned order is passed without application of mind and prima facie the order is passed mechanically.

Procedural History

The detenue was preventively detained vide order dated 20.11.2025 by the Commissioner of Police, Surat. The detenue challenged the order by filing Special Criminal Application No. 1676 of 2026 before the Gujarat High Court. The Court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 24.02.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985: Section 2(c)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Ineligible Slum Dwellers Against Eviction Notice in Slum Rehabilitation Project. Appellants Found to Be Transit Camp Tenants Who Suppressed Earlier Proceedings and Used Dilatory Tactics to Obstruct Redevelopment Unde...