Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish that the detenue's activities affected public order.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 25
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mohit @Mitraj Ishvarbhai Makwana, through his father Ishvarbhai Dhirubhai Makwana, challenged the legality and validity of a preventive detention order dated 25.12.2025 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City, classifying him as a 'Dangerous Person' under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985. The detenue was detained in Bhuj Jail. The petitioner's counsel argued that there was no material available with the detention authority to indicate how public health, public order, or public tranquility was disturbed, and that the order was passed mechanically without application of mind. The learned APP opposed the petition, contending that the detenue was a habitual offender whose activities affected society at large, and that the authority had passed the order considering his antecedents and past activities to prevent him from acting in a prejudicial manner. The court, after hearing both sides, found that the impugned order was passed without any material to show that the detenue's activities had disturbed public order. The court noted that the order was based solely on the registration of FIRs, which did not establish a threat to public order. Consequently, the court quashed and set aside the detention order and directed the detenue's release.

Headnote

A) Preventive Detention - Dangerous Person - Public Order - Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985, Section 2(c) - The court considered whether the detention order was valid when there was no material to indicate disturbance to public health, public order, or public tranquility. The court held that in absence of such material, the order of detention ought not to have been passed. (Paras 4-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the detention order classifying the detenue as a 'Dangerous Person' under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 was valid when there was no material to show disturbance to public order.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed and set aside the detention order dated 25.12.2025 and directed the detenue to be set at liberty forthwith.

Law Points

  • Preventive detention
  • Dangerous person
  • Public order
  • Lack of material
  • Mechanical order
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (02) 452

R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 449 of 2026

2026-02-09

N.S.SANJAY GOWDA, D. M. VYAS

MR VILAV K BHATIA, MR CHINTAN DAVE

Mohit @Mitraj Ishvarbhai Makwana Thro Ishvarbhai Dhirubhai Makwana

State of Gujarat & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to preventive detention order

Remedy Sought

Quashing of detention order and release of detenue

Filing Reason

Detenue's father challenged the detention order dated 25.12.2025 classifying the detenue as a 'Dangerous Person' under the Act of 1985

Issues

Whether the detention order was valid when there was no material to show disturbance to public order.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that there was no material to indicate disturbance to public health, public order, or public tranquility, and the order was passed mechanically. Respondent argued that the detenue was a habitual offender and his activities affected society at large, justifying the detention.

Ratio Decidendi

A preventive detention order classifying a person as a 'Dangerous Person' under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 cannot be sustained if there is no material to show that the person's activities disturbed public order. Mere registration of FIRs does not establish a threat to public order.

Judgment Excerpts

there was no material available with the detention authority to indicate as to how the public health or public order or public tranquility was disturbed in any manner. the impugned order is passed without application of mind and prima facie the order is passed mechanically.

Procedural History

The detenue was preventively detained vide order dated 25.12.2025 by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City. The detenue, through his father, filed a Special Criminal Application before the High Court challenging the order. The court heard both sides and delivered judgment on 09.02.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985: 2(c)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order and Substitutes Forfeiture for Dismissal in BSF Court Martial Case. Commandant (Selection Grade) and Commandant Belong to Same Rank and Cadre Under Border Security Force Act, 1968, Making Court Martial Consti...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder in Family Feud Case. Court acquits three other accused due to lack of evidence, finding that the prosecution failed to prove their involvement beyond reasonable doubt.