Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Labour Court Award in Industrial Dispute Due to Settlement Between Employer and Employee. Parties Agreed to Settle Dispute Under Section 2(p) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Resulting in Modification of Award and Payment of Lump Sum Compensation.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Jewel Consumer Care Pvt. Ltd., challenged the award dated 31.1.2025 passed by the Labour Court, Vadodara in Reference (LCV) No.106 of 2017, which partly allowed the reference and granted reinstatement with continuity of service and 25% backwages to the respondent-workman, Ramsinh Raisinh Chauhan. During the pendency of the petition before the High Court, the parties amicably settled the dispute and executed a Memorandum of Settlement under Section 2(p) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The settlement agreement, dated 13.2.2026, was tendered by the petitioner's advocate and taken on record. The terms of the settlement provided that the workman would receive a lump sum amount of Rs.1,50,000 in full and final settlement of all claims, including backwages and compensation, and would withdraw the reference. The workman also agreed not to claim reinstatement. The Court, after perusing the settlement and verifying the signatures of the parties, recorded the settlement and disposed of the petition in terms thereof. The impugned award was modified to the extent that the workman would be entitled to the settlement amount instead of reinstatement and backwages. The Court directed the petitioner to pay the amount within four weeks and ordered that the reference stands disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Industrial Disputes - Settlement - Section 2(p) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Parties entered into a Memorandum of Settlement during pendency of petition challenging Labour Court award - Court recorded the settlement and disposed of the petition in terms thereof - Held that the settlement is binding and the award stands modified accordingly (Paras 3-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned award of the Labour Court granting reinstatement with 25% backwages should be upheld or set aside in light of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is disposed of in terms of the settlement agreement dated 13.2.2026. The impugned award stands modified accordingly. The petitioner shall pay the settlement amount of Rs.1,50,000 to the respondent-workman within four weeks from the date of the order. The reference stands disposed of in terms of the settlement.

Law Points

  • Settlement under Section 2(p) of Industrial Disputes Act
  • 1947
  • can be recorded and made part of court order
  • High Court can modify Labour Court award based on settlement
  • Parties can settle industrial disputes amicably during pendency of proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (02) 433

R/Special Civil Application No. 15153 of 2025

2026-02-24

Hemant M. Prachchhak

Varun K. Patel for Petitioner, Darshit D. Thakkar for Respondent

Jewel Consumer Care Pvt. Ltd.

Ramsinh Raisinh Chauhan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India challenging Labour Court award in an industrial dispute.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash and set aside the impugned award dated 31.1.2025 passed by Labour Court, Vadodara in Reference (LCV) No.106 of 2017.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was aggrieved by the Labour Court award granting reinstatement with continuity of service and 25% backwages to the respondent-workman.

Previous Decisions

Labour Court, Vadodara partly allowed Reference (LCV) No.106 of 2017 vide award dated 31.1.2025, granting reinstatement with continuity of service and 25% backwages.

Issues

Whether the impugned award should be upheld or set aside in light of the settlement between the parties.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's advocate tendered a copy of the settlement agreement dated 13.2.2026 arrived at between the parties.

Ratio Decidendi

When parties to an industrial dispute arrive at a settlement under Section 2(p) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 during the pendency of proceedings, the court may record the settlement and dispose of the matter in terms thereof, modifying any earlier award to reflect the agreed terms.

Judgment Excerpts

It appears that during the pendency of the petition, an amicable settlement has been arrived at between the parties. The terms and conditions stipulated in the said settlement agreement shall form part and parcel of this order and are hereby reproduced as under:-

Procedural History

The Labour Court, Vadodara passed an award on 31.1.2025 in Reference (LCV) No.106 of 2017 partly allowing the reference. The petitioner challenged the award by filing Special Civil Application No.15153 of 2025 before the High Court of Gujarat. During the pendency of the petition, the parties entered into a settlement agreement dated 13.2.2026. The High Court disposed of the petition in terms of the settlement on 24.2.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: 2(p)
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Labour Court Award in Industrial Dispute Due to Settlement Between Employer and Employee. Parties Agreed to Settle Dispute Under Section 2(p) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Resulting in Modification o...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Cooperative Society Mortgage Dispute — Section 164 Notice Not Required When Suit Filed Against Non-Member. Purchaser of property not a member of cooperative society is not required to serve notice under Sec...