Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim - Multiplier Based on Deceased's Age and Future Prospects Added. Compensation Enhanced for Death of 19-Year-Old Bachelor, Insurance Company Directed to Pay Additional Rs. 1,60,000 with Interest.

  • 17
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Yitesh Sadana alias Prince, a 19-year-old bachelor, died due to the negligence of a bus driver. The claimants, his widowed mother and minor brother, sought enhancement of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and the Delhi High Court. The Tribunal had awarded Rs. 3,72,620, which the High Court enhanced to Rs. 5,02,620. The Supreme Court considered two main issues: the correct multiplier and the addition of future prospects. The Court held that following the Constitution Bench in Pranay Sethi and the three-Judge Bench in Royal Sundaram, the multiplier must be based on the deceased's age (18) not the mother's age (15). Additionally, 40% of the established income should be added for future prospects as the deceased was self-employed and below 40. After deducting 50% for personal expenses, the loss of dependency was calculated at Rs. 5,92,488. Adding Rs. 70,000 under conventional heads, total compensation was fixed at Rs. 6,62,448. After deducting the High Court's award, the insurance company was directed to pay an additional Rs. 1,60,000 with 7% interest from the claim petition date.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Compensation - Multiplier - Age of Deceased vs. Dependents - In case of death of a bachelor, the multiplier must be based on the age of the deceased, not the age of the dependents - Following Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited v. Mandala Yadagari Goud and Others, (2019) 5 SCC 554, the Supreme Court held that the age of the deceased is to be taken into account for calculating the multiplier (Paras 10-11).

B) Motor Accident Compensation - Future Prospects - Self-Employed Deceased - Addition of 40% for deceased below 40 years - As per National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi and Others, (2017) 16 SCC 680, for a self-employed deceased aged 19 years, 40% of the established income must be added towards future prospects (Paras 8-9).

C) Motor Accident Compensation - Deduction for Personal Expenses - Bachelor - 50% deduction - For a bachelor deceased, 50% of the gross income is to be deducted towards personal living expenses (Para 9).

D) Motor Accident Compensation - Conventional Heads - Loss of Estate, Consortium, Funeral Expenses - As per Pranay Sethi, compensation under conventional heads is Rs. 15,000 for loss of estate, Rs. 40,000 for loss of consortium, and Rs. 15,000 for funeral expenses, with 10% enhancement every three years (Para 11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the multiplier for computing loss of dependency should be based on the age of the deceased or the age of the dependents, and whether future prospects should be added for a self-employed deceased.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. The third respondent/insurance company is directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 1,60,000 with simple interest at 7% per annum from the date of claim petition till deposit, within two months. The first appellant is permitted to withdraw the amount. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Motor Accident Compensation
  • Multiplier based on age of deceased
  • Future prospects for self-employed
  • Deduction for personal expenses of bachelor
  • Conventional heads compensation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (12) 72

Civil Appeal No. 9312 of 2019 (@SLP(C)29193/2019)

2019-12-10

S. Abdul Nazeer, Sanjiv Khanna

Kunjan Sadana & Anr.

Mahesh Kumar & Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against judgment of High Court of Delhi in MAC Appeal No.479 of 2009, seeking enhancement of compensation in a motor accident claim.

Remedy Sought

Appellants (claimants) sought further enhancement of compensation awarded by the High Court.

Filing Reason

The deceased, a 19-year-old bachelor, died in a motor vehicle accident due to negligence of a bus driver. The claimants were dissatisfied with the compensation awarded by the Tribunal and High Court.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 3,72,620 on 06.06.2009. The High Court of Delhi partly allowed the appeal and enhanced compensation to Rs. 5,02,620 on 08.08.2017.

Issues

Whether the multiplier for computing loss of dependency should be based on the age of the deceased or the age of the dependents? Whether future prospects should be added for a self-employed deceased?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the multiplier should be 18 based on deceased's age (19 years), not 15 based on mother's age (42 years). They also submitted that the High Court failed to consider future prospects. Insurer sought to justify the impugned judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

In motor accident claims for death of a bachelor, the multiplier must be based on the age of the deceased, not the age of the dependents. For a self-employed deceased below 40 years, 40% of the established income must be added towards future prospects. 50% deduction for personal expenses applies to bachelors.

Judgment Excerpts

In case the deceased was self-employed or on a fixed salary, an addition of 40% of the established income should be the warrant where the deceased was below the age of 40 years. We are convinced that there is no need to once again take up this issue settled by the aforesaid judgments of three-Judge Benches and also relying upon the Constitution Bench that it is the age of the deceased which has to be taken into account and not the age of the dependents.

Procedural History

The claim petition was filed before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal which awarded Rs. 3,72,620 on 06.06.2009. The claimants appealed to the High Court of Delhi in MAC Appeal No.479 of 2009, which partly allowed the appeal and enhanced compensation to Rs. 5,02,620 on 08.08.2017. The claimants then filed the present appeal before the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim - Multiplier Based on Deceased's Age and Future Prospects Added. Compensation Enhanced for Death of 19-Year-Old Bachelor, Insurance Company Directed to Pay Additional Rs. 1,60,000 with Interest.
Related Judgement
High Court Legal Precedent on Developer Change in SRA Projects. Understanding the implications of the judgment for developer changes in Slum Rehabilitation Authority projects.