Gujarat High Court Partially Allows State Appeal in Acquittal Case — Upholds Conviction for Grievous Hurt but Acquits of Attempt to Murder. Court finds that injuries caused by blunt weapons do not constitute attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC, but amount to voluntarily causing grievous hurt under Section 325 IPC.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Gujarat filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 30.06.2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Banaskantha at Palanpur in Sessions Case No. 40 of 2001. The trial court had acquitted respondent No. 4 (original accused No. 4) of all charges, and acquitted respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 (original accused Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6) of charges under Sections 147, 148 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), but convicted them under Sections 323 and 325 IPC and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. The incident occurred on 10.07.2000 when the injured persons were going on a tractor to their field and the accused persons came head-on. There was a prior grudge over parking of a tractor. The accused formed an unlawful assembly and assaulted the complainant's brothers and sister-in-law with weapons like wooden sticks, a scythe, and an iron pipe. The trial court found that the injuries were not dangerous to life and did not attract Section 307 IPC, but amounted to grievous hurt under Section 325 IPC. The State appealed against the acquittal under Section 307 IPC. The High Court, after hearing the learned APP and perusing the record, held that the trial court's view was plausible and not perverse. The injuries were caused by blunt weapons on non-vital parts, and there was no intention to cause death. Therefore, the acquittal under Section 307 IPC was upheld. However, the convictions under Sections 323 and 325 IPC and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act were confirmed. The appeal was partly allowed, maintaining the trial court's judgment.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Acquittal Appeal - Section 378(1)(3) CrPC - Scope of Interference - The High Court in an appeal against acquittal can interfere only if the trial court's view is perverse or unreasonable, not merely because a different view is possible. The court must give due weight to the presumption of innocence in favor of the accused. (Paras 5-6)

B) Indian Penal Code - Attempt to Murder - Section 307 IPC - Intention to Cause Death - For an offence under Section 307 IPC, the prosecution must prove that the accused had the intention to cause death or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death. The nature of injuries, weapons used, and the part of the body targeted are relevant factors. In this case, injuries were caused by blunt weapons on non-vital parts, and no injury was found to be dangerous to life. Hence, the trial court correctly acquitted the accused under Section 307 IPC. (Paras 7-10)

C) Indian Penal Code - Grievous Hurt - Section 325 IPC - Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt - The trial court convicted the accused under Section 325 IPC based on medical evidence showing fractures and grievous injuries. The High Court upheld the conviction as the injuries were grievous in nature and caused voluntarily. (Paras 11-12)

D) Bombay Police Act - Section 135 - Unlawful Assembly - The accused were also convicted under Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act for being members of an unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapons. The High Court upheld this conviction as the evidence showed they were part of an unlawful assembly. (Para 13)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial court was justified in acquitting the respondents for offences under Sections 147, 148 and 307 IPC while convicting them under Sections 323 and 325 IPC and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act, and whether the State's appeal against acquittal under Section 307 IPC should be allowed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court partly allowed the appeal. The acquittal of the respondents under Sections 147, 148 and 307 IPC was upheld. The convictions under Sections 323 and 325 IPC and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act were confirmed. The sentences imposed by the trial court were maintained.

Law Points

  • Acquittal appeal
  • Section 378 CrPC
  • Scope of interference in acquittal appeal
  • Section 307 IPC
  • Attempt to murder
  • Intention to cause death
  • Nature of injuries
  • Section 325 IPC
  • Grievous hurt
  • Section 323 IPC
  • Hurt
  • Section 135 Bombay Police Act
  • Unlawful assembly
  • Common object
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:10074-DB

R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1318 of 2003

2026-02-07

Honourable Mr. Justice Bhargav D. Karia, Honourable Mr. Justice P. M. Raval

2026:GUJHC:10074-DB

Mr. Dhawan Jayswal (APP) for the Appellant, Mr. H.R. Prajapati for Respondent No. 2, Mr. Tushar Chaudhary for Respondent Nos. 1,3,4,5,6

State of Gujarat

Rabari Malabhai Devabhai & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal acquittal appeal by the State against the judgment of the trial court acquitting the respondents of charges under Sections 147, 148 and 307 IPC, but convicting them under Sections 323 and 325 IPC and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act.

Remedy Sought

The State sought reversal of the acquittal under Sections 147, 148 and 307 IPC and enhancement of the sentence.

Filing Reason

The State was aggrieved by the acquittal of the respondents for the more serious offences under Sections 147, 148 and 307 IPC.

Previous Decisions

The trial court in Sessions Case No. 40 of 2001 acquitted respondent No. 4 of all charges, and acquitted respondent Nos. 1,2,3,5,6 of charges under Sections 147, 148 and 307 IPC, but convicted them under Sections 323 and 325 IPC and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act.

Issues

Whether the trial court was justified in acquitting the respondents for offences under Sections 147, 148 and 307 IPC? Whether the convictions under Sections 323 and 325 IPC and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act are sustainable?

Submissions/Arguments

The learned APP submitted that the trial court erred in acquitting the accused under Section 307 IPC as the injuries were grievous and the accused had the intention to cause death. The respondents' counsel argued that the trial court's view was plausible and the injuries were not dangerous to life, hence no interference is warranted.

Ratio Decidendi

In an appeal against acquittal, the High Court can interfere only if the trial court's view is perverse or unreasonable. For an offence under Section 307 IPC, the prosecution must prove intention to cause death or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death. The nature of injuries, weapons used, and the part of the body targeted are relevant. In this case, injuries were caused by blunt weapons on non-vital parts, and no injury was dangerous to life. Hence, the acquittal under Section 307 IPC was justified.

Judgment Excerpts

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned advocates for the respective respondents are not present. This is an acquittal appeal at the instance of the State filed under Section 378(1)(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 assailing the judgment and order dated 30.06.2003 passed in Sessions Case No. 40 of 2001...

Procedural History

The trial court in Sessions Case No. 40 of 2001 acquitted respondent No. 4 of all charges, and acquitted respondent Nos. 1,2,3,5,6 of charges under Sections 147, 148 and 307 IPC, but convicted them under Sections 323 and 325 IPC and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. The State filed the present appeal under Section 378(1)(3) CrPC against the acquittal. The High Court heard the appeal on 07.02.2026 and partly allowed it.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 378(1)(3)
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 147, 148, 307, 323, 325
  • Bombay Police Act: 135
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Partially Allows State Appeal in Acquittal Case — Upholds Conviction for Grievous Hurt but Acquits of Attempt to Murder. Court finds that injuries caused by blunt weapons do not constitute attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC,...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against Judgment Debtor and Sub Registrars for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Prohibitory Order and Communication Order in Execution Proceedings. Court Held That the Prohibitory Order Under Order 21 Rul...