High Court of Karnataka Upholds Insurance Company's Liability in Motor Accident Claim — Third Party Risk Coverage Extends to Pillion Rider Under Section 147 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court held that a pillion rider on a two-wheeler is a third party covered under the insurance policy, and the insurer is liable to pay compensation even without additional premium.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 126
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal by the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 26.06.2010 passed by the II Additional District Judge & Member, MACT-III, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore, in MVC No.1423/2004, awarding compensation of Rs.71,960/- with interest at 6% p.a. to the claimant, Sri. Ganesh Devadiga, for injuries sustained in a road accident. The accident occurred on 31.07.2004 at about 8.45 p.m. when the claimant was a pillion rider on a Bajaj Chetak Scooter No.CTA 8277. Due to the rash and negligent riding of the scooter by its rider, the scooter fell, causing the claimant to suffer a fracture of his left leg. The claimant filed a claim petition seeking compensation. The Tribunal held the insurance company liable to pay the compensation. The insurance company appealed, contending that the pillion rider was not covered under the policy as no additional premium was paid for pillion rider coverage. The High Court, after hearing arguments, dismissed the appeal, holding that a pillion rider on a two-wheeler is a third party covered under the insurance policy under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the insurer is liable to pay compensation even without additional premium. The court relied on the principle that the policy covers the risk of third parties, and a pillion rider falls within that category. The court upheld the Tribunal's award and directed the insurance company to pay the compensation.

Headnote

A) Motor Vehicles Act - Third Party Insurance - Pillion Rider Coverage - Section 147 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The court held that a pillion rider on a two-wheeler is a third party covered under the insurance policy, and the insurer is liable to pay compensation even if no additional premium is paid for pillion rider coverage, as the policy covers the risk of third parties. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation for injuries sustained by a pillion rider on a two-wheeler, when the policy does not specifically cover pillion riders?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed; insurance company held liable to pay compensation

Law Points

  • Insurance company liable for pillion rider as third party
  • Section 147 MV Act covers pillion rider
  • No requirement of additional premium for pillion rider coverage
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (KAR) (02) 38

MFA NO.9577/2010(MV)

2022-02-02

P. Krishna Bhat

Sri. A Ravishankar (for appellant), Sri. V.S. Hegde (for respondent 3)

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd

Sri. Ganesh Devadiga, Sri Abdul Khadar, Sri. Ashok

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

Remedy Sought

Insurance company sought to avoid liability to pay compensation

Filing Reason

Insurance company challenged the Tribunal's decision fastening liability on it

Previous Decisions

Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.71,960/- with interest at 6% p.a. in MVC No.1423/2004

Issues

Whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation for injuries sustained by a pillion rider on a two-wheeler, when the policy does not specifically cover pillion riders?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that pillion rider is not covered under the policy as no additional premium was paid Respondent argued that pillion rider is a third party and covered under the policy

Ratio Decidendi

A pillion rider on a two-wheeler is a third party covered under the insurance policy under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the insurer is liable to pay compensation even if no additional premium is paid for pillion rider coverage.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is at the instance of insurance company calling in question the correctness of the judgment and award dated 26.07.2010 passed in MVC No.1423/2004 by the II Addl. District Judge & Member, MACT-III, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore, to the extent of fastening the liability to pay the compensation on it.

Procedural History

Claim petition filed in MVC No.1423/2004 before MACT-III, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore; Tribunal awarded compensation on 26.06.2010; Insurance company filed MFA No.9577/2010 before High Court of Karnataka; High Court dismissed appeal on 02.02.2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 147, Section 173(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Upholds Insurance Company's Liability in Motor Accident Claim — Third Party Risk Coverage Extends to Pillion Rider Under Section 147 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court held that a pillion rider on a two-wheeler is a thir...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices Under Section 344 CrPC for Filing False Affidavits in Anticipatory Bail Proceedings — Mere Filing of False Affidavits Not Sufficient to Initiate Summary Proceedings for Contempt