High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Husband's Petition to Quash Maintenance Order Under Domestic Violence Act — Interim Maintenance of Rs. 3,000 Per Month Upheld. Husband's Claim of No Income Rejected as Able-Bodied Person Capable of Earning Under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 50
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner-husband and respondent-wife were married on 13.04.2001. Marital discord led the wife to file a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, seeking maintenance. The learned Magistrate, by order dated 15.10.2018 in Crl.Misc.No.141/2015, granted interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000 per month to the wife. The husband's revision petition before the Sessions Judge was dismissed on 12.06.2019 in Crl.R.P.No.14/2019. Aggrieved, the husband filed the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the orders. The sole ground urged was that the husband had no income and was unable to pay maintenance. The Court observed that the husband, being an able-bodied person, is capable of earning and cannot shirk his responsibility to maintain his wife. The quantum of Rs. 3,000 per month was not excessive. The concurrent findings of the courts below did not suffer from any illegality or perversity warranting interference under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Domestic Violence - Interim Maintenance - Section 12, 20 Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - The husband challenged the order granting interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000 per month to the wife, claiming he had no income. The Court held that the husband, being an able-bodied person, is capable of earning and cannot avoid liability to maintain his wife. The quantum of maintenance was not excessive and did not warrant interference under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (Paras 1-6)

B) Criminal Procedure Code - Inherent Powers - Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - The Court reiterated that the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is to be exercised sparingly and only to prevent abuse of process of court or to secure ends of justice. The concurrent findings of the courts below did not call for interference. (Para 6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order granting interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000 per month to the wife under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, is liable to be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on the ground that the husband has no income?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. The order dated 12.06.2019 in Crl.R.P.No.14/2019 passed by the Sessions Judge, Dharwad, confirming the order dated 15.10.2018 in Crl.Misc.No.141/2015 passed by the Magistrate, is upheld.

Law Points

  • Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act
  • 2005
  • Section 20 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act
  • Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure
  • 1973
  • Interim maintenance
  • Domestic violence
  • Quantum of maintenance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (KAR) (02) 13

Criminal Petition No.101378/2019

2022-02-17

M. Nagaprasanna

Miss Joshna P. Dhanave (for petitioner), Respondent served but unrepresented

Shivanand S/o Karabasappa Gurannavar

Basavva @ Laxmi W/o Shivanand Gurannavar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash orders granting interim maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner-husband sought to set aside the order dated 12.06.2019 in Crl.R.P.No.14/2019 passed by the Sessions Judge, Dharwad, confirming the order dated 15.10.2018 in Crl.Misc.No.141/2015 passed by the Magistrate, and consequently dismiss the wife's maintenance petition.

Filing Reason

The husband challenged the grant of interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000 per month to the wife, claiming he had no income.

Previous Decisions

The Magistrate granted interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000 per month on 15.10.2018 in Crl.Misc.No.141/2015. The Sessions Judge dismissed the husband's revision on 12.06.2019 in Crl.R.P.No.14/2019.

Issues

Whether the order granting interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000 per month to the wife under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, is liable to be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on the ground that the husband has no income?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner-husband argued that he has no income and is unable to pay the maintenance amount. Respondent-wife was served but unrepresented.

Ratio Decidendi

An able-bodied person is capable of earning and cannot avoid liability to maintain his wife merely by claiming no income. The quantum of interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000 per month is not excessive. The inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is to be exercised sparingly and only to prevent abuse of process or secure ends of justice; concurrent findings of fact do not warrant interference.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner-husband is before this Court praying to quash the order dated 12.06.2019 passed in Crl.R.P.No.14/2019 by the learned Sessions Judge, Dharwad confirming the order passed by the learned Magistrate in Crl.Misc.141/2015 dated 15.10.2018. The petitioner and the respondent are husband and wife. Marriage between them takes place on 13.04.2001. The learned Magistrate by the impugned order grants interim maintenance of Rs.3,000/- per month to the respondent-wife. The only ground urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has no income. The petitioner being an able-bodied person is capable of earning and cannot avoid the liability to maintain his wife. The quantum of maintenance is also not excessive. The concurrent findings of the courts below do not call for any interference in the exercise of the jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.

Procedural History

The respondent-wife filed a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, in Crl.Misc.No.2/2009 (later renumbered as Crl.Misc.No.141/2015) seeking maintenance. The Magistrate granted interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000 per month on 15.10.2018. The husband filed a revision before the Sessions Judge, which was dismissed on 12.06.2019 in Crl.R.P.No.14/2019. The husband then filed the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: 12, 20
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Father's Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 498A and 304-B IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act Upheld Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand of Dowry.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Police Misconduct and Unlawful Detention — Violation of Article 21 and 22(1) of Constitution of India. Police Officers Abused and Detained Petitioner Without Authority, Court Orders Inquiry and Action.