High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in Education Trust Case — Directs Reconsideration of Recognition Cancellation. Unilateral Withdrawal of Recognition Without Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Karnataka Education Act, 1983.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 47
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellants, Veerabhadreshwara Education Trust and Panchamasali Pre-University College, filed a writ appeal against the order dated 23.03.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.100377/2022, which dismissed their petition and issued certain directions. The first appellant is a registered Public Charitable Trust running the second appellant college, which was established based on permission granted by the Government of Karnataka vide order dated 24.07.2010. The college is unaided and commenced operations from the academic year 2011-12. The respondents, including the Government of Karnataka and the Director of Pre-University Education, cancelled the recognition of the college without issuing any show cause notice or affording an opportunity of hearing to the appellants. The appellants contended that this cancellation was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. The Division Bench, comprising Justice S.R. Krishna Kumar and Justice G Basavaraja, heard the matter and found that the cancellation was indeed without any prior notice or hearing, thus unsustainable in law. The court set aside the impugned order and directed the respondents to reconsider the matter afresh after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellants. The appeal was allowed, and the respondents were directed to pass appropriate orders within a stipulated time.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Recognition of Educational Institutions - Cancellation of Recognition - Principles of Natural Justice - The appellants, a Trust and its college, challenged the cancellation of recognition by the respondents without affording an opportunity of hearing. The Division Bench held that the cancellation was arbitrary and violative of natural justice, as no show cause notice or hearing was given before the adverse order. The court set aside the cancellation and directed reconsideration after hearing the appellants. (Paras 1-10)

B) Education Law - Unilateral Withdrawal of Permission - Government Order dated 24.07.2010 - The college was established based on a government order granting permission. The respondents unilaterally withdrew the recognition without any prior notice or justification. The court held that such unilateral action without following due process is unsustainable. (Paras 2-5)

C) Education Law - Writ Appeal - Maintainability - The appeal was filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act against the order of the Single Judge. The Division Bench found merit in the appeal and allowed it, setting aside the impugned order and directing the respondents to reconsider the matter after hearing the appellants. (Paras 1, 10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned order dated 23.03.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.100377/2022 is sustainable in law, particularly in light of the alleged violation of principles of natural justice and the merits of the recognition cancellation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 23.03.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.100377/2022 is set aside. The respondents are directed to reconsider the matter afresh after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellants and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Principles of natural justice
  • audi alteram partem
  • right to be heard before adverse order
  • Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act
  • Karnataka Education Act
  • 1983
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (KAR) (09) 8

WA No. 100141 of 2022 (EDN-AD)

2023-09-14

S.R. Krishna Kumar, G Basavaraja

Sri.V.Raghuraman (Senior Counsel for Sri.Srinand A. Pachchapure) for appellants; Sri.Shivaprabhu Hiremath (Addl. Govt. Advocate) for respondents

Sri. Veerabhadreshwara Education Trust and Panchamasali Pre-University College

The Government of Karnataka, The Director, Department of Pre-University Education, and The Deputy Director, Department of Pre-University Education

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeal against order of Single Judge dismissing writ petition challenging cancellation of recognition of educational institution.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside the impugned order dated 23.03.2022 and allow the writ appeal.

Filing Reason

The recognition of the college was cancelled without affording an opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

The learned Single Judge dismissed W.P.No.100377/2022 and issued certain directions.

Issues

Whether the cancellation of recognition without hearing violates principles of natural justice? Whether the impugned order of the Single Judge is sustainable?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the cancellation was arbitrary and without any show cause notice or hearing. Respondents contended that the cancellation was justified and in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi

Any cancellation of recognition of an educational institution without affording an opportunity of hearing is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. The authority must follow due process before taking adverse action.

Judgment Excerpts

This Intra Court appeal by the appellants is directed against the impugned order dated 23.03.2022 passed in W.P.No. 100377/2022, whereby the said petition filed by the appellants was dismissed by the learned Single Judge, who proceeded further and issued certain directions to the parties. The 1st appellant claims to be a registered Public Charitable Trust and the said Trust is running the 2nd appellant - College on the basis of the permission given by the 1st respondent – State vide order dated 24.07.2010.

Procedural History

The appellants filed W.P.No.100377/2022 before the High Court of Karnataka, which was dismissed by the learned Single Judge on 23.03.2022. Aggrieved, the appellants filed the present writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act. The appeal was heard by the Division Bench, which allowed the appeal on 14.09.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act: Section 4
  • Karnataka Education Act, 1983:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in Education Trust Case — Directs Reconsideration of Recognition Cancellation. Unilateral Withdrawal of Recognition Without Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Karnataka Education Act, 198...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Mumbai Quashes Process in Dishonour of Cheque Cases for Non-Compliance with Section 202 Cr.P.C. — Accused Residing Outside Magistrate's Jurisdiction Requires Mandatory Enquiry Before Issuance of Process.