High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Registration of FIR in Assault Case. Police Duty to Register FIR for Cognizable Offence Under Section 154 CrPC Upheld Following Lalitha Kumari v. State of U.P.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Prosecution
  • 98
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Vittal, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent, the PSI of Babaleshwar Police Station, to register an FIR based on his complaint dated 18.11.2022. The complaint alleged that certain persons assaulted the petitioner's daughter-in-law, took her cell phone, abused her, and threatened her with death. The petitioner contended that despite the complaint disclosing cognizable offences under the Indian Penal Code, the police failed to register an FIR or take any action. The court examined the complaint and found that the allegations indeed constituted cognizable offences. Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Lalitha Kumari v. State of U.P., the court held that the police have a mandatory duty under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to register an FIR when a complaint discloses a cognizable offence. The court allowed the petition and directed the respondent police to register an FIR based on the complaint and proceed with the investigation in accordance with law. The judgment was delivered by Justice Suraj Govindaraj on 20 July 2023.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Registration of FIR - Cognizable Offence - Section 154 CrPC - Police duty to register FIR when complaint discloses cognizable offence - Petitioner's complaint dated 18.11.2022 alleged assault, theft of cell phone, abuse and death threats against his daughter-in-law, constituting cognizable offences under IPC - Police failed to register FIR - Court held that police are bound to register FIR under Section 154 CrPC if the complaint discloses a cognizable offence, following Lalitha Kumari v. State of U.P. - Direction issued to register FIR and investigate (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the police can refuse to register an FIR when the complaint discloses a cognizable offence

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The respondent police are directed to register an FIR based on the complaint dated 18.11.2022 and proceed with investigation in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Duty of police to register FIR for cognizable offences
  • Mandamus for non-registration of FIR
  • Lalitha Kumari v. State of U.P. principle
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (KAR) (07) 132

WP No. 201668 of 2023 (GM-POLICE)

2023-07-20

Suraj Govindaraj

NC: 2023:KHC-K:5678

Sri. Ravichandra Jadhav, Sri. Prakash Jadhav (for petitioner), Smt. Maya T.R., HCGP (for respondent)

Vittal S/o Matarba Dhale

The PSI of Babaleshwar Police Station

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to compel police to register an FIR.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to respondent police to register FIR against accused as per complaint dated 18.11.2022.

Filing Reason

Police failed to register FIR despite complaint disclosing cognizable offences of assault, theft, abuse, and death threats.

Issues

Whether the police are bound to register an FIR when the complaint discloses a cognizable offence.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the complaint dated 18.11.2022 disclosed cognizable offences under IPC, but police failed to register FIR or take action. Respondent police did not file any counter or objection.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 154 CrPC, the police have a mandatory duty to register an FIR when a complaint discloses a cognizable offence, as held by the Supreme Court in Lalitha Kumari v. State of U.P. Failure to do so is a dereliction of duty, and a writ of mandamus can be issued to compel registration.

Judgment Excerpts

The grievance of the petitioner is that the complaint made by the petitioner on 18.11.2022 against certain persons has not been registered as a FIR by the respondent-police and no action has been taken thereon. The Hon’ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. State of U.P. has held that if a complaint discloses a cognizable offence, the police are bound to register an FIR under Section 154 CrPC.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed complaint on 18.11.2022; police failed to register FIR; petitioner filed writ petition on 20.07.2023; court heard and allowed petition on same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 154
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Retirement Age Dispute — Upholds Labour Court's Finding on Date of Birth Correction Based on Government Gazette. The Industrial Court exceeded its revisional jurisdiction under Section 44 of MRTU & PULP Act...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition in Service Dispute - Backwages Reduced from Full to 50% for Conductor. Labour Court's award of full backwages from 1966 to 1991 set aside as workman failed to prove unemployment; 50% backwages granted ...