Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Freedom Fighter Pension Case. Central Government Recognition of Freedom Fighter Binds State Government for Pension Disbursement Under State Scheme.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 95
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the State of Karnataka against an order of a learned Single Judge who allowed the writ petition of Smt. Annapurna Kambar, the widow of late Shri Basappa Kambar. The respondent's husband was recognized as a freedom fighter by the Central Government and was granted pension under the Central Scheme. After his death, the respondent applied for family pension under the Karnataka Freedom Fighters' Pension Rules, 1981. The State rejected her application on the ground that the verification process regarding her husband's freedom fighter status was not completed. The learned Single Judge quashed the State's order and directed the State to grant pension with arrears. The State appealed. The Division Bench held that once the Central Government has recognized a person as a freedom fighter and granted pension, the State Government cannot deny pension under the State Scheme on the ground of insufficient verification. The State is bound by the Central Government's recognition. The appeal was dismissed, and the State was directed to disburse pension to the respondent within three months.

Headnote

A) Freedom Fighters' Pension - Recognition by Central Government - Binding Effect on State - The State Government cannot deny pension to a freedom fighter or his widow on the ground that its own verification process is pending, when the Central Government has already recognized the person as a freedom fighter and granted pension under the Central Scheme. The State is bound by the Central Government's recognition and must grant pension under the State Scheme without further verification. (Paras 5-10)

B) Administrative Law - Legitimate Expectation - Pension as Continuing Right - Once a person is recognized as a freedom fighter by the Central Government, the widow has a legitimate expectation to receive pension from the State Government. The State cannot defeat this expectation by insisting on redundant verification. (Paras 8-10)

C) Interpretation of Statutes - Karnataka Freedom Fighters' Pension Rules, 1981 - Rule 3 - The Rules do not empower the State to conduct independent verification once the Central Government has granted recognition. The State's role is limited to disbursing pension in accordance with the Central recognition. (Paras 6-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the State Government can deny freedom fighters' pension to the widow of a recognized freedom fighter on the ground that the State Government's own verification process was not completed, despite the Central Government having already recognized the freedom fighter and granted pension.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ appeal is dismissed. The order of the learned Single Judge dated 14.09.2021 in W.P. No.103248/2021 is upheld. The appellants are directed to take necessary steps to grant/disburse freedom fighters' pension together with all arrears in favour of the respondent within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Law Points

  • Freedom fighters' pension
  • Central Government recognition
  • State Government's obligation
  • Karnataka Freedom Fighters' Pension Rules
  • 1981
  • Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act
  • 1961
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (KAR) (07) 87

Writ Appeal No.100246 of 2022 (GM-FF)

2023-07-07

Justice R. Devdas, Justice Rajesh Rai K

Smt. Vidyavathi M. Kotturshettar, AAG and Sri. V.S. Kalasurmath, HCGP for appellants; Sri. H.M. Dharigond and Smt. Sangeetha F. Kallimani, Advocates for respondent

The State of Karnataka, represented by Principal Secretary, Department of DPAR (Political Pension), M.S. Building, Bengaluru-560001; The Deputy Commissioner, Belagavi District, Belagavi-590001; The Assistant Commissioner, Bailhongal, Sub Division, Bailhongal, District Belagavi-591102; The Joint Director, District Treasury Office, Belagavi District, Belagavi-591102

Smt. Annapurna W/o Basappa Kambar, Age 89 Years, Occ: Household Work, R/o. Belavadi Taluk, Bailhongal, District Belagavi - 591102

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeal against order of learned Single Judge directing State to grant freedom fighters' pension to widow of recognized freedom fighter.

Remedy Sought

Appellants (State) sought to set aside the order of the learned Single Judge dated 14.09.2021 in W.P. No.103248/2021.

Filing Reason

State aggrieved by the order of the learned Single Judge quashing the State's order dated 11.02.2021 and directing grant of pension to respondent.

Previous Decisions

Learned Single Judge allowed W.P. No.103248/2021 on 14.09.2021, quashing the State's order dated 11.02.2021 and directing grant of pension with arrears.

Issues

Whether the State Government can deny freedom fighters' pension to the widow of a recognized freedom fighter on the ground that the State Government's own verification process was not completed, despite the Central Government having already recognized the freedom fighter and granted pension.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the State Government is required to conduct its own verification before granting pension under the State Scheme, and that the Central Government's recognition does not automatically entitle the respondent to pension under the State Rules. Respondent argued that once the Central Government has recognized the freedom fighter and granted pension, the State Government cannot deny pension under the State Scheme, and the State's verification process is redundant.

Ratio Decidendi

The Central Government's recognition of a person as a freedom fighter and grant of pension under the Central Scheme is binding on the State Government. The State cannot deny pension under the State Scheme on the ground of insufficient verification when the Central Government has already recognized the freedom fighter. The State's role is limited to disbursing pension in accordance with the Central recognition.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellants in this writ appeal have questioned the correctness and validity of the order dated 14.09.2021, passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No.103248/2021 wherein the learned single Judge by allowing the writ petition quashed the order dated 11.02.2021 passed by the first appellant and further directed to take necessary steps to grant/disburse freedom fighters' pension together with all arrears in favour of the respondent. Once the Central Government has recognized a person as a freedom fighter and granted pension, the State Government cannot deny pension under the State Scheme on the ground of insufficient verification.

Procedural History

The respondent filed W.P. No.103248/2021 before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, challenging the order dated 11.02.2021 passed by the first appellant (State) rejecting her claim for freedom fighters' pension. The learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition on 14.09.2021, quashing the State's order and directing grant of pension. Aggrieved, the State filed this writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961. The appeal was heard and reserved for judgment on 17.04.2023, and judgment was delivered on 07.07.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: Section 4
  • Karnataka Freedom Fighters' Pension Rules, 1981: Rule 3
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Directs Pending Redetermination Application Under Section 28A Land Acquisition Act Until High Court Appeal Disposed Of. Reference Court Award Enhancing Compensation Was Appealed; Collector to Act on Final Judgment of High Court.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Delivers Judgment in Appeal from Order No.19/2024 Concerning Enemy Property and Inheritance Under Defence of India Act, 1962. Court Examines Statutory Definitions of Enemy and Enemy Property and Custodian Powers Under Defe...