High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition of Principal Challenging Termination — Disciplinary Enquiry Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Non-Supply of Enquiry Report Under Rule 17 of Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Rules 1978 Renders Termination Invalid.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Accused
  • 91
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Hebbalappa Havalappa Hiremani, was employed as Principal of Smt. Giraja Mahila Pre-University College, Sindhanur, run by the respondent-Society, from 1994. A disciplinary enquiry was initiated against him on ten charges relating to misappropriation of monies and highhandedness under Rule 17 of the Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Rules 1978. An Enquiry Officer was appointed who submitted a report confirming the delinquency. Based on this report, the respondent terminated the petitioner's services. The petitioner challenged the termination by filing a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the judgment and award of the Principal District Judge at Raichur in EAT 2/2004 dated 25.08.2009, and a writ of mandamus for reinstatement with consequential benefits. The court found that the Enquiry Officer's report was not supplied to the petitioner before the punishment was imposed, which is a fundamental violation of the principles of natural justice. The court held that the disciplinary proceedings were vitiated and set aside the termination order. The court directed the respondent to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service and 50% back wages from the date of termination till reinstatement, within three months. The writ petition was allowed in part.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Disciplinary Enquiry - Natural Justice - Rule 17 of Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Rules 1978 - Petitioner, a Principal, was terminated after an enquiry into ten charges of misappropriation - The Enquiry Officer submitted a report confirming delinquency, but the report was not supplied to the petitioner before imposing punishment - Held that non-supply of enquiry report vitiates the disciplinary proceedings as it violates principles of natural justice (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the disciplinary enquiry and termination order passed against the petitioner were in compliance with principles of natural justice and Rule 17 of the Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Rules 1978.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed in part. The impugned judgment and award dated 25.08.2009 in EAT 2/2004 passed by the Principal District Judge at Raichur is quashed. The respondent is directed to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service and 50% back wages from the date of termination till reinstatement, within three months.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Enquiry report must be supplied
  • Opportunity of hearing
  • Rule 17 Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Rules 1978
  • Writ of certiorari
  • Reinstatement with back wages
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (KAR) (05) 26

WP No. 84740 of 2010 (S-RES)

2023-05-25

Suraj Govindaraj

S.S. Mamadapur for petitioner; Shivakumar Malipatil for R1; Shivakumar Tengli, AGA for R2

Hebbalappa Havalappa Hiremani

Narasimha Swamy Vidya Samsthe

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging termination of service and seeking reinstatement with consequential benefits.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash the judgment and award of the Principal District Judge at Raichur in EAT 2/2004 dated 25.08.2009, and a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to reinstate him with all consequential benefits.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was terminated from service as Principal after a disciplinary enquiry, without being supplied the enquiry report, violating principles of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

The Principal District Judge at Raichur passed a judgment and award in EAT 2/2004 dated 25.08.2009, which was challenged in this writ petition.

Issues

Whether the disciplinary enquiry and termination order were in compliance with principles of natural justice? Whether non-supply of the enquiry report vitiates the disciplinary proceedings?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the enquiry report was not supplied to him before imposing punishment, violating natural justice. Respondent argued that the enquiry was conducted properly and the termination was justified.

Ratio Decidendi

Non-supply of the enquiry report to the delinquent employee before imposing punishment is a violation of principles of natural justice, rendering the disciplinary proceedings and termination order invalid. The employee is entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.

Judgment Excerpts

The Enquiry Officer was appointed who submitted a report confirming the delinquency against the petitioner. The Enquiry Officer's report was not supplied to the petitioner before the punishment was imposed. Non-supply of enquiry report vitiates the disciplinary proceedings as it violates principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

The petitioner was employed as Principal from 1994. Disciplinary enquiry initiated under Rule 17 of the Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Rules 1978. Enquiry Officer submitted report confirming delinquency. Respondent terminated petitioner's services. Petitioner challenged termination before Principal District Judge, Raichur in EAT 2/2004, which was dismissed on 25.08.2009. Petitioner then filed this writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Rules 1978: Rule 17
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition of Principal Challenging Termination — Disciplinary Enquiry Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Non-Supply of Enquiry Report Under Rule 17 of Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Disciplin...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.