High Court of Karnataka Quashes Appointment of Special Officer for Cooperative Society Election — Appointment Without Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The Court held that the Deputy Registrar's order appointing a Special Officer without hearing the Board of Directors under the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 is invalid and set aside.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 25
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who are directors of the Town Cooperative Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 06/03/2023 passed by the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies (respondent No.3) appointing a Special Officer to conduct elections of the society. The petitioners contended that the impugned order was passed without issuing any notice or affording an opportunity of hearing to the Board of Directors, thereby violating the principles of natural justice. The respondents, represented by the Government Advocate, did not seriously contest the petition. The Court, after hearing the counsel, observed that the appointment of a Special Officer without notice to the Board of Directors is unsustainable in law as it infringes the right to be heard. Consequently, the Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order, and directed the respondents to issue notice to the petitioners and hear them before proceeding with the appointment of a Special Officer or taking any further action.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Appointment of Special Officer - Principles of Natural Justice - The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies appointed a Special Officer to conduct elections of the Town Cooperative Society Ltd. without issuing any notice or hearing to the Board of Directors. The Court held that such an appointment without notice violates the principles of natural justice, specifically the rule of audi alteram partem, and is liable to be quashed. (Paras 1-6)

B) Constitutional Law - Writ of Certiorari - Quashing of Administrative Order - The High Court, exercising jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, quashed the order appointing the Special Officer as it was passed in violation of natural justice. The Court directed the respondents to issue notice to the petitioners and hear them before proceeding further. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appointment of a Special Officer by the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies without issuing notice to the Board of Directors of the Cooperative Society is valid and sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 06/03/2023 passed by the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies is quashed. The respondents are directed to issue notice to the petitioners and hear them before proceeding with the appointment of a Special Officer or taking any further action.

Law Points

  • Principles of natural justice
  • audi alteram partem
  • right to be heard
  • appointment of special officer under Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act
  • 1959
  • writ of certiorari
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (KAR) (03) 50

Writ Petition No. 6419 of 2023 (CS-RES)

2023-03-27

Suraj Govindaraj

Devi Prasad Shetty for petitioners, A.R. Shardamba for respondents 1 to 3

T N Shivraju and others

State of Karnataka and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the appointment of a Special Officer for conducting elections of a cooperative society.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the order dated 06/03/2023 passed by the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies appointing a Special Officer.

Filing Reason

The impugned order was passed without issuing notice or affording an opportunity of hearing to the Board of Directors, violating principles of natural justice.

Issues

Whether the appointment of a Special Officer without notice to the Board of Directors violates principles of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the impugned order was passed without any notice or hearing, violating natural justice. Respondents did not seriously contest the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

An order appointing a Special Officer for a cooperative society without issuing notice to the Board of Directors is violative of the principles of natural justice and is liable to be quashed. The right to be heard is a fundamental principle that must be observed before any adverse administrative action is taken.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned order has been passed without issuing any notice to the petitioners and without affording an opportunity of hearing to them. The appointment of a Special Officer without notice to the Board of Directors is unsustainable in law. The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order is quashed.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed a writ petition on an unspecified date challenging the order dated 06/03/2023 passed by the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies. The matter was heard on 27/03/2023 and disposed of on the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Appointment of Special Officer for Cooperative Society Election — Appointment Without Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The Court held that the Deputy Registrar's order appointing a Special Officer witho...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Government Servant in Election Forgery Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Allegations of impersonation and forgery during cooperative society election cannot proceed against public servant without ...