Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Direction to Trial Court to Sign Each Page of Case Diary in NIA Case. Court holds that there is no statutory requirement for the trial court to sign or initial each page of the case diary, and the practice is not mandated by the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Mohammed Shiyab, was involved in a murder incident on 26 July 2022 at Sullia town, leading to the registration of Crime No.63 of 2022. The case was subsequently transferred to the National Investigating Agency (NIA) under Sections 16 and 18 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, and registered as RC-36/2022/NIA/DLI. The appellant filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the trial court (49th Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Court for Trial of NIA Cases at Bengaluru) to sign or initial each page of the case diary from page 1 to the last page and to continue this practice until the filing of the charge sheet. The learned Single Judge dismissed the petition on 20 December 2023. The appellant then filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961. The Division Bench heard the appeal and considered the submissions. The court noted that the case diary is a police document maintained under Section 172 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and there is no statutory requirement for the trial court to sign or initial each page. The court held that the practice sought by the appellant is not mandated by law, and the trial court's role is limited to perusing the case diary for the purposes of the trial. The appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Case Diary - Signing of Pages - No Statutory Requirement - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Sections 172, 173 - The appellant sought a direction to the trial court to sign or initial each page of the case diary. The court held that there is no provision in the CrPC requiring the trial court to sign or initial each page of the case diary. The case diary is a police document maintained under Section 172 CrPC, and the court's role is limited to perusing it for trial purposes. The appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial court can be directed to sign or initial each page of the case diary in an NIA case, and whether such a practice is required by law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The order of the learned Single Judge dated 20.12.2023 in Writ Petition No.1781/2023 is confirmed.

Law Points

  • No statutory requirement for trial court to sign each page of case diary
  • Practice not mandated by CrPC
  • Case diary is a police document
  • Court cannot issue directions without legal basis
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (KAR) (10) 22

Writ Appeal No. 102 of 2024 (GM-POLICE)

2024-10-25

N.V. Anjaria, Chief Justice, K.V. Aravind, J.

Sri Mohammed Tahir for appellant, Sri P. Prasanna Kumar for respondent

Mohammed Shiyab

National Investigating Agency

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeal against dismissal of petition seeking direction to trial court to sign each page of case diary.

Remedy Sought

Direction to trial court to sign or initial each page of case diary in NIA case.

Filing Reason

Appellant sought to ensure authenticity of case diary pages.

Previous Decisions

Learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition on 20.12.2023.

Issues

Whether the trial court can be directed to sign or initial each page of the case diary in an NIA case. Whether such a practice is required by law.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the trial court should sign each page of the case diary to ensure its authenticity. Respondent argued that there is no statutory requirement for such practice.

Ratio Decidendi

There is no statutory requirement under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for the trial court to sign or initial each page of the case diary. The case diary is a police document, and the court's role is limited to perusing it for trial purposes. The practice sought by the appellant is not mandated by law.

Judgment Excerpts

What was prayed in the writ petition was to direct the trial Court... 'to sign or put initials to each page of case diary of RC-36/2022/NIA/DLI...' Noticing the facts from the pleadings of the petition, it appears that the petitioner was found to be involved in a murder incident which took place on 26th July 2022 at Sullia town...

Procedural History

The appellant filed Writ Petition No.1781/2023 before the High Court of Karnataka seeking a direction to the trial court to sign each page of the case diary. The learned Single Judge dismissed the petition on 20.12.2023. The appellant then filed the present Writ Appeal No.102/2024 under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: 4
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 120B, 302, 34
  • Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967: 16, 18
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 172, 173
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Direction to Trial Court to Sign Each Page of Case Diary in NIA Case. Court holds that there is no statutory requirement for the trial court to sign or initial each page of the case diary, and the practic...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Disposes of Appeal Against Interim Order in Entry Tax Interest Dispute. No Further Recovery of Interest on Arrears of Entry Tax Pending Final Decision of Writ Petition Under U.P. Act 2007.