High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Housing Society vs Contractor Dispute Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court holds that existence of arbitration clause in agreement dated 30.06.2006 mandates appointment of arbitrator, leaving objections regarding limitation and pre-arbitral conditions to be decided by the arbitrator.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sri. Ramakrishna House Building Co-operative Society (R) (South), filed three civil miscellaneous petitions under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes with the respondent, M/s Skilletch Engineers and Contractors Pvt Ltd (also referred to as Skilltech Engineers and Contractors Pvt Ltd in CMP No. 5/2025). The disputes arose from an agreement dated 30.06.2006, which contained an arbitration clause (Clause No. 17). The petitioner, represented by its President Sri M Sanjeev Shetty, was represented by Advocate Sri Y K Narayana Sharma. The respondent, represented by its Managing Director Sri K Shivashankar, was represented by Advocate Sri Umesh B N. The court, presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suraj Govindaraj, considered the petitions together. The court noted that the arbitration clause existed and that disputes had arisen between the parties. The respondent raised objections regarding limitation and pre-arbitral conditions, but the court held that these are matters for the arbitrator to decide at the appropriate stage. Consequently, the court allowed the petitions and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes in terms of the arbitration agreement. The judgment was delivered on 14th November 2025.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Appointment of Arbitrator - Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Existence of Arbitration Clause - Petitioner sought appointment of sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under agreement dated 30.06.2006 containing arbitration clause - Court held that since arbitration clause exists and disputes have arisen, appointment of arbitrator is warranted - Held that objections regarding limitation and pre-arbitral conditions are matters for the arbitrator to decide (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a sole arbitrator should be appointed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate disputes between the parties arising from an agreement dated 30.06.2006 containing an arbitration clause.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petitions and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties in terms of the arbitration agreement dated 30.06.2006.

Law Points

  • Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • Appointment of arbitrator
  • Existence of arbitration clause
  • Limitation for arbitration
  • Pre-arbitral conditions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

NC: 2025:KHC:47112

CMP No. 4 of 2025, C/W CMP No. 5 of 2025, CMP No. 6 of 2025

2025-11-14

Suraj Govindaraj

NC: 2025:KHC:47112

Y K Narayana Sharma (for petitioner), Umesh B N (for respondent)

Sri. Ramakrishna House Building Co-operative Society (R) (South)

M/s Skilletch Engineers and Contractors Pvt Ltd (also M/s Skilltech Engineers and Contractors Pvt Ltd in CMP No. 5/2025)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil miscellaneous petitions under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of sole arbitrator.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought appointment of a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the parties in terms of the arbitration clause in the agreement dated 30.06.2006.

Filing Reason

Disputes arose between the parties under an agreement dated 30.06.2006 containing an arbitration clause, and the petitioner sought court intervention to appoint an arbitrator.

Issues

Whether a sole arbitrator should be appointed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that there is an arbitration clause in the agreement and disputes have arisen, warranting appointment of an arbitrator. Respondent raised objections regarding limitation and pre-arbitral conditions.

Ratio Decidendi

The existence of an arbitration clause in the agreement and the arising of disputes between the parties are sufficient grounds for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Objections regarding limitation and pre-arbitral conditions are matters for the arbitrator to decide.

Judgment Excerpts

THIS CIVIL MISC. PETITION IS FILED UNDER SEC.11(6) OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996, PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT BE PLEASED TO APPOINT A SOLE ARBITRATOR TO ADJUDICATE THE DISPUTES BETWEEN THE PARTIES IN TERMS OF ANNEXURE A i.e. AGREEMENT DATED 30.06.2006 CLAUSE NO. 17 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed three civil miscellaneous petitions under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator. The court heard the petitions together and delivered judgment on 14.11.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 11(6)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Housing Society vs Contractor Dispute Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court holds that existence of arbitration clause in agreement dated 30.06.2006 manda...
Related Judgement
High Court Grant of Deemed Conveyance: Upholding Rights of Housing Societies Despite Unlawful Construction. Balancing flat purchasers' statutory rights with developers' non-compliance under the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act (MOFA).