Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Insurance Company Officials in Cheque Dishonour Case — No Vicarious Liability Without Specific Allegations. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 dismissed as petitioners were not signatories to the cheque and no role attributed to them.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Bombay High Court dealt with two criminal writ petitions seeking quashing of proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The first petition was filed by officers of New India Assurance Company Ltd., including the Regional Manager, Administrative Officer, Senior Divisional Manager, and others. The second petition was filed by Shri Kaushal Madanlal Kishore, an individual. The common respondent was Samraj Gold Exports Pvt. Ltd., which had filed a complaint alleging dishonour of a cheque issued by the insurance company. The petitioners argued that they were not signatories to the cheque and that the complaint did not contain any specific allegations against them regarding the transaction. The court examined the complaint and found that the only allegation against the petitioners was that they were officers of the company, without any specific role in the issuance of the cheque. Relying on the principle that vicarious liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act requires specific averments, the court held that the proceedings against the petitioners were an abuse of process. The court quashed the criminal proceedings against all petitioners, allowing both writ petitions.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Negotiable Instruments Act - Section 138 - Vicarious Liability - Quashing of Complaint - Petitioners, officers of an insurance company, were not signatories to the dishonoured cheque and no specific role was attributed to them in the complaint - Held that in the absence of specific allegations, criminal proceedings cannot be sustained against them - Complaint quashed (Paras 10-15).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can be sustained against officers of a company who are not signatories to the cheque and against whom no specific allegations of involvement in the transaction are made.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both criminal writ petitions are allowed. The criminal proceedings against the petitioners in the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 are quashed.

Law Points

  • Vicarious liability
  • Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act
  • 1881
  • Quashing of criminal proceedings
  • Absence of specific allegations
  • Directors/officers liability
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:BHC-AS:18279

Criminal Writ Petition No. 3626 of 2022 and Criminal Writ Petition No. 6246 of 2024

2026-04-18

2026:BHC-AS:18279

New India Assurance Company Ltd. and others; Kaushal Madanlal Kishore

Samraj Gold Exports Pvt. Ltd. and State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petitions seeking quashing of proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of criminal complaint and proceedings against the petitioners.

Filing Reason

Petitioners were arraigned as accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act despite not being signatories to the dishonoured cheque and without specific allegations of involvement.

Issues

Whether criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be sustained against officers who are not signatories to the cheque and against whom no specific allegations are made.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they were not signatories to the cheque and no specific role was attributed to them in the complaint. Respondent argued that the petitioners being officers of the company are vicariously liable.

Ratio Decidendi

Vicarious liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act requires specific allegations against the accused showing their role in the transaction. In the absence of such allegations, criminal proceedings cannot be sustained against officers who are not signatories to the cheque.

Judgment Excerpts

In the absence of specific allegations, criminal proceedings cannot be sustained against the petitioners.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138, 141
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Insurance Company Officials in Cheque Dishonour Case — No Vicarious Liability Without Specific Allegations. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 dismissed as petition...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Demarcation of Dharavi Koliwada Boundaries in Dharavi Redevelopment Project Dispute. The court issued a writ of mandamus to the State of Maharashtra and other respondents to expeditiously determine and finalise the outer bou...