High Court Allows Writ Petition, Quashes Caste Certificate Rejection and Directs Issuance of Validity Certificate to 'Mang' Scheduled Caste Claimant. Documentary Evidence from 1932 Prevails Over Alleged Conversion Issues

Sub Category: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR

Admin

2026-02-28 09:41:48

Font size:

Case Note & Summary

The High Court allowed a writ petition challenging the rejection of a caste certificate claim. The Petitioner, claimed belonging to the 'Mang' Scheduled Caste and submitted documentary evidence including a 1932 school leaving certificate showing his great grandfather's caste as 'Mang'. The District Caste Certificate Verification Committee rejected the claim based on Christian entries in some documents and alleged conversion to Christianity. The Court examined the evidence and found that pre-constitutional documents from 1932 and 1934 clearly established the caste as 'Mang', and a validity certificate had already been issued to a relative. The Court held the Committee's decision was arbitrary and directed issuance of a caste validity certificate to the Petitioner.

Headnote

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench -- Heard Writ Petition challenging order dated 27/09/2023 passed by District Caste Certificate Verification Committee, Akola -- The Committee invalidated Petitioner's caste claim to 'Mang' Scheduled Caste -- Petitioner contended he belongs to 'Mang' caste recognized at Serial No.46 in Maharashtra Scheduled Caste List -- Petitioner submitted School Leaving Certificate dated 10/08/1932 showing great grandfather's caste as 'Mang' -- Committee rejected claim based on Christian entries in some documents and alleged conversion -- Court examined documentary evidence including 1932 and 1934 certificates showing 'Mang' caste -- Found validity certificate already issued to Petitioner's relative Prabhakar Ganpat Sathe -- Held Committee failed to consider pre-constitutional documents -- Directed issuance of caste validity certificate to Petitioner

Premium Content

The Headnote is only available to subscribed members.

Subscribe Now to access key legal points

Issue of Consideration: Whether the Petitioner's caste claim to 'Mang' Scheduled Caste was wrongly rejected by the Scrutiny Committee despite documentary evidence

Premium Content

The Issue of Consideration is only available to subscribed members.

Subscribe Now to access critical case issues

Final Decision

The Court allowed the Writ Petition, quashed the order dated 27/09/2023, and directed the Respondent Committee to issue a caste validity certificate to the Petitioner within four weeks

2026 LawText (BOM) (02) 142

Writ Petition No. 2665 of 2024

2026-02-26

Mrs. M. S. Jawalkar J. , Nandesh S. Deshpande J.

2026:BHC-NAG:3387-DB

Mr. U. J. Deshpande, Mr. N. R. Patil

Stavan Wilson Sathe

The State of Maharashtra, The District Caste Certificate Verification Committee, Akola

Premium Content

The Indexes are only available to subscribed members.

Subscribe Now to access critical case indexes

Nature of Litigation: Writ Petition challenging administrative order rejecting caste certificate claim

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeking quashing of order dated 27/09/2023 and direction for issuance of caste validity certificate

Filing Reason

District Caste Certificate Verification Committee rejected Petitioner's caste claim to 'Mang' Scheduled Caste

Previous Decisions

Committee rejected claim based on Christian entries in documents and alleged conversion to Christianity

Issues

Whether the Petitioner's caste claim to 'Mang' Scheduled Caste was validly rejected by the Scrutiny Committee Whether documentary evidence from 1932 and 1934 establishing 'Mang' caste should prevail over later Christian entries

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued he belongs to 'Mang' Scheduled Caste with documentary evidence from 1932 showing great grandfather's caste as 'Mang' Respondents argued rejection was justified due to Christian entries and alleged conversion of father and grandfather to Christianity

Ratio Decidendi

Pre-constitutional documentary evidence from 1932 and 1934 establishing 'Mang' caste must be given primacy over later entries suggesting conversion -- The Committee failed to properly evaluate documentary evidence and existing validity certificate issued to relative -- Mere Christian entries in some documents do not automatically invalidate caste claim when pre-constitutional evidence exists

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner has submitted a proposal for validation of caste claim along with document i.e. School Leaving Certificate issued by Headmaster of Akola Municipal Corporation Primary School No.4, Akola to great grandfather of the Petitioner namely 'Ganpat Bhika' dated 10/08/1932 In spite of this explanation, the Caste claim of the Petitioner came to be rejected holding that his grandfather and father appeared to have accepted Christianity It is a matter of record that there is a document of 1932, which is school leaving certificate, wherein the caste of the great grandfather of the Petitioner is shown as 'Mang'

Procedural History

Petitioner submitted caste validation proposal with documents -- Matter referred to Vigilance Cell -- Committee issued notice based on Vigilance Report -- Petitioner submitted reply with additional documents -- Committee rejected claim on 27/09/2023 -- Petitioner filed Writ Petition on 2024 -- Court heard matter at admission stage by consent -- Judgment reserved on 23/02/2026 -- Judgment pronounced on 26/02/2026