Case Note & Summary
The petitioner, Piyush Haridas Modi, an individual taxpayer, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a reassessment order dated 31.03.2023 passed under Section 147 read with Sections 144 and 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for Assessment Year 2018-19. The petitioner had filed his return of income for the relevant year. The case was reopened by a notice under Section 148 of the Act dated 31.03.2023. Subsequently, the petitioner received a notice under Section 142(1) of the Act on 16.02.2023 seeking various details, to which the petitioner replied on 24.02.2023. Thereafter, a show cause notice was issued proposing to make additions. The petitioner contended that the show cause notice under Section 148A(b) did not provide the relevant material or information relied upon by the Assessing Officer, thereby violating the principles of natural justice. The respondents argued that the notice was valid and the petitioner had been given adequate opportunity. The court examined the provisions of Section 148A(b) and noted that the requirement to provide an opportunity of being hearing necessarily implies that the assessee must be furnished with the material on which the Assessing Officer proposes to rely. Without such material, the assessee cannot effectively respond. The court found that the show cause notice did not contain the relevant material, and thus the reassessment proceedings were invalid. The court quashed the impugned assessment order and the notice under Section 148, but granted liberty to the respondents to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law, provided they comply with the requirements of Section 148A(b).
Headnote
A) Income Tax - Reassessment - Section 148A(b) - Show Cause Notice - Requirement to Provide Relevant Material - The court held that the show cause notice issued under Section 148A(b) must contain the relevant material or information relied upon by the Assessing Officer, and failure to do so violates principles of natural justice and renders the reassessment proceedings invalid. The court quashed the reassessment order dated 31.03.2023 and the notice under Section 148 dated 31.03.2023, with liberty to the respondents to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law. (Paras 7-9) B) Income Tax - Reassessment - Section 148A(b) - Opportunity of Hearing - The court emphasized that the requirement under Section 148A(b) to provide an opportunity of being heard includes furnishing the material on which the Assessing Officer proposes to rely, as the assessee cannot effectively respond without knowing the basis of the proposed action. (Paras 7-9)
Issue of Consideration
Whether the reassessment order passed under Section 147 read with Sections 144 and 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is invalid for non-compliance with the mandatory requirement under Section 148A(b) to provide the assessee with the relevant material relied upon in the show cause notice.
Final Decision
The court allowed the petition, quashing the impugned assessment order dated 31.03.2023 and the notice under Section 148 of the Act dated 31.03.2023. The respondents were granted liberty to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law, provided they comply with the requirements of Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Law Points
- Natural justice
- Reassessment
- Section 148A
- Show cause notice
- Relevant material
- Income Tax Act
- 1961




