Gujarat High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Unlicensed Driver. Driver lacked valid transport licence; insurer liable to pay compensation but entitled to recover from owner and driver under 'pay and recover' principle.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 105
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the claimant sustained injuries due to a collision between a motorcycle and a luxury bus. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Anand awarded compensation of Rs.6,82,182/- with 9% interest. The Insurance Company appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, contending that the driver of the offending bus did not possess a valid transport driving licence on the date of the accident. The Insurance Company had raised this defence in its written statement (Exh. 18) and led evidence by examining an RTO officer (Exh. 57) and producing documentary evidence (Exh. 58). The evidence showed that the driver held a non-transport licence valid from 03.05.2006 to 02.05.2026, but the transport vehicle licence was valid only from 05.03.2010 to 04.03.2013. Since the accident occurred on 23.04.2013, the transport licence had expired. The Tribunal, however, did not consider this proved breach. The High Court, after hearing the appellant's counsel, found that the breach of policy condition was established. Relying on the principle of 'pay and recover', the Court held that the Insurance Company must pay the awarded compensation to the claimant but is entitled to recover the same from the owner and driver of the offending vehicle. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the award to the extent of granting recovery rights.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Driving Licence - Transport Vehicle - Section 149 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The Insurance Company raised a defence that the driver did not hold a valid transport licence. The RTO officer deposed that the transport licence expired before the accident date. The Tribunal failed to consider this proved breach. The High Court held that the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation to the third party but is entitled to recover the amount from the owner and driver of the offending vehicle, following the principle of 'pay and recover' (Paras 4-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Insurance Company can be exonerated from liability when the driver of the offending vehicle did not possess a valid transport driving licence at the time of the accident, and if not, whether a 'pay and recover' order should be passed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The judgment and award of the Tribunal is modified to the extent that the Insurance Company shall pay the awarded compensation to the claimant and shall be entitled to recover the same from the owner and driver of the offending vehicle in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 149
  • driving licence
  • transport vehicle
  • pay and recover
  • insurance liability
  • breach of policy condition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (01) 741

R/First Appeal No. 2503 of 2022

2026-01-08

Hasmukh D. Suthar

2026:GUJHC:1236

Mr. Rathin P Raval for the appellant; Mr. Rasesh H Parikh and Mr. Hemang H Parikh for the respondent No. 1.1

Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd

Shailrajsinh Kanaksinh Rana & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.

Remedy Sought

The appellant Insurance Company sought exoneration from liability or, in the alternative, an order of 'pay and recover'.

Filing Reason

The Insurance Company was aggrieved by the Tribunal's award which did not consider the defence that the driver lacked a valid transport driving licence.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Anand partly allowed the claim petition and awarded compensation of Rs.6,82,182/- with 9% interest.

Issues

Whether the driver of the offending vehicle held a valid transport driving licence on the date of the accident? Whether the Insurance Company is entitled to be exonerated or to a 'pay and recover' order?

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that a specific defence regarding the driver's invalid licence was raised and proved through RTO officer evidence, but the Tribunal failed to consider it. The appellant prayed for exoneration or, alternatively, a 'pay and recover' order.

Ratio Decidendi

Where the driver of the offending vehicle does not possess a valid transport driving licence at the time of the accident, the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation to the third party but is entitled to recover the amount from the owner and driver under the 'pay and recover' principle.

Judgment Excerpts

the driver of the offending vehicle was holding a non-transport vehicle licence for the period from 03.05.2006 to 02.05.2026, whereas the transport vehicle licence was valid only from 05.03.2010 to 04.03.2013. the Insurance Company shall pay the awarded compensation to the claimant and shall be entitled to recover the same from the owner and driver of the offending vehicle.

Procedural History

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Anand passed the award on 30.08.2020 in MACP No.481 of 2013. The Insurance Company filed the present appeal on an unspecified date. The High Court heard the appeal and delivered judgment on 08.01.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 149, Section 173
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Unlicensed Driver. Driver lacked valid transport licence; insurer liable to pay compensation but entitled to recover from owner and driver under 'pay and recover' pri...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Filing of Statement Under Section 209A Does Not Automatically Lead to Underestimation of Advance Tax for Section 216 Interest. Interest under Section 216 of Income Tax Act,...