High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification in Municipal Tender Due to Non-Compliance with Financial Eligibility Criteria -- Petitioner Fails to Prove Arbitrariness in Profitability Assessment Under Indian Accounting Standards

Sub Category: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 33
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, challenged its disqualification from a tender process for municipal solid waste management by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai -- The disqualification was based on the petitioner's failure to meet the modified profitability criteria requiring positive profit after tax for five consecutive financial years -- Specifically, for FY 2022-23, the petitioner's balance sheet showed a loss, but its Chartered Accountant certified positive profit after tax by including Other Comprehensive Income under Indian Accounting Standards -- The court held that the tender authority's decision to compute profit after tax without considering OCI was not arbitrary, as it applied a uniform standard and the authority had the prerogative to interpret its own conditions -- The writ petition was dismissed, and the disqualification was upheld

Headnote

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed a writ petition challenging the disqualification of Petitioner from a tender process for municipal solid waste management -- The petitioner was disqualified by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai for failing to meet the modified profitability criteria requiring positive profit after tax for five consecutive financial years -- The petitioner argued that its Chartered Accountant's certificate showed positive profit after tax for FY 2022-23 when Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) under Ind AS was considered, despite a loss in the Profit & Loss Account -- The court held that the tender authority's interpretation of profit after tax as gross income minus expenses minus tax, without including OCI, was not arbitrary -- The court emphasized that the authority applied a uniform standard to all bidders and had the discretion to interpret its own tender conditions -- The petition was dismissed, upholding the disqualification and forfeiture of earnest money deposit

Issue of Consideration: The Issue of Consideration was whether the petitioner's disqualification from the tender process by the Municipal Corporation for allegedly not meeting the profitability criteria was arbitrary and in violation of the tender conditions, particularly regarding the interpretation of profit after tax under Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS)

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the disqualification of the petitioner from the tender process and the forfeiture of 10% of the earnest money deposit

2026 LawText (BOM) (02) 65

Writ Petition No.5367 of 2025 along with Interim Application (Lodging) No.38376 of 2025 and Interim Application (Lodging) No.39353 of 2025

2026-02-13

Shree Chandrashekhar, CJ., Gautam A. Ankhad, J.

2026:BHC-OS:4292-DB

Mr. Sharan Jagtiani, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Farhan Khan, Mr. Kaushik Poddar, Mr. Pankaj Uttaradhi, Mr. Ravish Ajay Mishra for the Petitioner, Mr. Nikhil Sakhardande, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Pralhad Paranjpe, Ms. Oorja Dhond, i/by Ms. Komal R. Punjabi for Respondent Nos.1 to 3, Smt. Lavina Kripalani for Respondent No.4, Mr. Girish Godbole, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Siddhartha Puthoor, Mr. Janmesh Vora, Advocates, i/by Mehta & Padamsey for Respondent No.7

Ecogreen Envirotech Solutions Ltd.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, The Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Deputy Chief Engineer (Solid Waste Management) Planning, State of Maharashtra, C.E. Infra (India), Aakshya Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd., Delhi Waste Management Najafgarh Pvt. Ltd.

Nature of Litigation: Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the disqualification of a bidder in a tender process

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought quashing of the disqualification order and reinstatement in the tender process, along with a direction to consider its bid

Filing Reason

The petitioner was disqualified for not meeting the profitability criteria in the tender, which it contested as arbitrary and based on a misinterpretation of accounting standards

Previous Decisions

The respondent no.3 disqualified the petitioner on 17 November 2025, leading to the filing of this writ petition

Issues

Whether the petitioner's disqualification from the tender process for not meeting the profitability criteria was arbitrary and in violation of the tender conditions Whether the interpretation of profit after tax by the tender authority, excluding Other Comprehensive Income under Indian Accounting Standards, was reasonable and uniformly applied

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that its Chartered Accountant's certificate showed positive profit after tax for FY 2022-23 when OCI under Ind AS was considered, and the tender condition did not prescribe a specific accounting methodology, making the disqualification arbitrary The respondents argued that the authority applied a uniform standard of computing profit after tax as gross income minus expenses minus tax, without including OCI, and had the prerogative to interpret its own tender conditions, with the petitioner not seeking clarification in the pre-bid meeting

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that judicial review of tender disqualification is limited to examining arbitrariness or mala fides in the decision-making process -- The tender authority, as the author of the document, has the discretion to interpret its own conditions and apply uniform standards to all bidders -- The authority's computation of profit after tax without including Other Comprehensive Income was not arbitrary, as it was based on a plain reading of the term and applied consistently -- The court found no violation of principles of natural justice or Wednesbury unreasonableness in the decision

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner challenges its disqualification by the respondent no.1 in the technical bid in respect of Tender at serial no.6 for collection and transportation of municipal solid waste Upon scrutiny, the respondent no.3 noticed that while the Financial Certificate reflected a positive Profit after Tax of Rs.32.32 lakhs for Financial Year 2022-23, the balance sheet of the petitioner showed a loss of Rs.44.06 lakhs The authority is the author of the tender and in the best position to interpret the document A uniform standard has been applied to all bidders for computing profit after tax, that is, Gross Income minus Expenses minus Tax

Procedural History

On 14 May 2025, the respondent no.3 invited e-tenders -- A corrigendum dated 25 June 2025 modified the profitability criteria -- The petitioner submitted its bid on 3 July 2025 -- A clarification was sought on 23 September 2025, and the petitioner responded on 24 September 2025 -- The petitioner was disqualified on 17 November 2025 -- The writ petition was filed, and the judgment was reserved on 30 January 2026 and pronounced on 13 February 2026

Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification in Municipal Ten...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Acquisition Quashed Due to Non-Compliance with Statutory Procedure: Supreme Cour...