Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Bank Against Order Returning Recovery Application for Lack of Jurisdiction. Multi-State Co-operative Bank's Recovery Application Under Section 101 of Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 Held Maintainable Before Registrar Despite Conversion from State Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, T.J.S.B. Sahakari Bank Ltd., originally registered as Sadguru Jangli Maharaj Sahakari Bank Ltd. under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, was later converted into a multi-state co-operative society under the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. The bank had granted a loan to respondent no.1, a proprietary concern of Vasudeo Khachermal Agarwal, with respondents 2 and 3 as guarantors. Upon default, the bank filed a Recovery Application dated 24 September 2003 under Section 101 of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 before the Deputy Registrar (Respondent No.4). The Deputy Registrar, by order dated 31 October 2008, allowed the application and issued a recovery certificate. Respondent no.2 filed a Revision Application No.312 of 2009 before the Divisional Joint Registrar (Respondent No.5), who by order dated 23 January 2014 set aside the Deputy Registrar's order and returned the Recovery Application, directing the bank to file it under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 before the Co-operative Court. The bank challenged this revisional order in the High Court. The High Court allowed the writ petition, holding that upon conversion to a multi-state co-operative society, the provisions of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 apply. The Recovery Application under Section 101 of the 2002 Act was maintainable before the Registrar, and the Co-operative Court under the 1960 Act had no jurisdiction. The court set aside the revisional order and restored the Deputy Registrar's order dated 31 October 2008.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Jurisdiction - Recovery of Dues - Sections 101, 103 Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 - The petitioner bank, originally registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and later converted to a multi-state co-operative society under the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002, filed a Recovery Application under Section 101 of the 2002 Act before the Deputy Registrar. The Divisional Joint Registrar (Respondent No.5) returned the application holding that the dispute must be filed under Section 91 of the 1960 Act before the Co-operative Court. The High Court held that upon conversion, the provisions of the 2002 Act apply, and the Recovery Application under Section 101 was maintainable before the Registrar. The court set aside the revisional order and restored the Deputy Registrar's order. (Paras 2-10)

B) Co-operative Law - Conversion of Society - Applicability of Act - Section 24 Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 - The court held that once a society is converted into a multi-state co-operative society, the provisions of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 apply to all its affairs, including recovery of dues. The Registrar under the 2002 Act has jurisdiction to entertain recovery applications under Section 101, and the Co-operative Court under the 1960 Act has no jurisdiction. (Paras 5-9)

C) Co-operative Law - Recovery Certificate - Execution - Section 103 Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 - The court noted that the Registrar has the power to execute a recovery certificate under Section 103 of the 2002 Act, which is a complete code for recovery of dues by multi-state co-operative societies. The revisional authority erred in holding that the recovery application should be filed under the 1960 Act. (Paras 8-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Recovery Application filed by the petitioner under Section 101 of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 was maintainable before the Deputy Registrar (Respondent No.4) or ought to have been filed under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 before the Co-operative Court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the order dated 23 January 2014 passed by Respondent No.5, and restored the order dated 31 October 2008 passed by Respondent No.4. Rule made absolute.

Law Points

  • Jurisdiction of Registrar under Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act
  • 2002
  • Section 101 prevails over Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1960
  • Section 91 for recovery of dues by multi-state co-operative bank
  • Conversion of society from state act to multi-state act does not affect pending recovery proceedings
  • Registrar has power to execute recovery certificate under Section 103 of Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018:BHC-AS:4699

WRIT PETITION NO. 8657 OF 2014

2018-02-12

R.D. DHANUKA

2018:BHC-AS:4699

Mr.Shailendra S.Kanetkar for the Petitioner, Mr.Madhav J.Jamdar for the Respondent no. 1, Mr.A.Y.Skhare, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr.Joel Carlos for the Respondent no.2, Mr.S.D.Rayrikar, A.G.P. for the State – Respondent nos.4 and 5

T.J.S.B.Sahakari Bank Ltd.

M/s.Vasudeo Khachermal & Co. and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging revisional order returning Recovery Application for lack of jurisdiction.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner bank sought to quash the order dated 23 January 2014 passed by Respondent No.5 and restore the order dated 31 October 2008 passed by Respondent No.4 allowing the Recovery Application.

Filing Reason

The Divisional Joint Registrar (Respondent No.5) held that the Recovery Application under Section 101 of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 was not maintainable and should have been filed under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 before the Co-operative Court.

Previous Decisions

Deputy Registrar (Respondent No.4) allowed the Recovery Application on 31 October 2008. Respondent No.5 set aside that order on 23 January 2014 in Revision Application No.312 of 2009.

Issues

Whether the Recovery Application under Section 101 of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 was maintainable before the Deputy Registrar. Whether upon conversion of the bank from a state co-operative society to a multi-state co-operative society, the provisions of the 2002 Act apply to recovery proceedings.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that upon conversion, the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 applies and the Recovery Application under Section 101 was maintainable before the Registrar. Respondent no.2 argued that the dispute should be filed under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 before the Co-operative Court.

Ratio Decidendi

Upon conversion of a co-operative society from a state act to the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002, the provisions of the 2002 Act apply to all its affairs, including recovery of dues. The Recovery Application under Section 101 of the 2002 Act is maintainable before the Registrar, and the Co-operative Court under the state act has no jurisdiction.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition, the petitioner has impugned the order dated 23rd January,2014 passed by the respondent no.5 in Revision Application No.312 of 2009 thereby returning the Recovery Application dated 24th September,2003 and directing the petitioner to file the said application under section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 before the Co-operative Court. In my view, once the society is converted into a multi-state co-operative society, the provisions of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 would apply to the society. The Recovery Application under Section 101 of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 was maintainable before the Deputy Registrar.

Procedural History

The petitioner bank filed a Recovery Application under Section 101 of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 on 24 September 2003 before the Deputy Registrar (Respondent No.4). The Deputy Registrar allowed the application on 31 October 2008. Respondent no.2 filed a Revision Application No.312 of 2009 before the Divisional Joint Registrar (Respondent No.5), who on 23 January 2014 set aside the Deputy Registrar's order and returned the Recovery Application. The bank then filed the present writ petition in the High Court on 24 July 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002: 101, 103, 24
  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: 91
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Under Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A IPC Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses -- Conviction Overturned and Acquittal Restored
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Bank Against Order Returning Recovery Application for Lack of Jurisdiction. Multi-State Co-operative Bank's Recovery Application Under Section 101 of Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 Held Maintain...