Bombay High Court Considers Disqualification of Councillors Under Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1986. Reference to Larger Bench Addresses Meaning of 'Aghadi' and 'Original Political Party' Post-Elections.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The writ petition arose from the disqualification of five councillors of Navapur Municipal Council under the Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1986. The petitioners were elected on Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) tickets. After the general elections to the 19-member council, a post-poll aghadi (front) was formed on 1 December 2007 comprising nine NCP, two BJP, and one Shiv Sena councillor. Respondent No. 1 was chosen as leader of the aghadi and later elected President of the council. In June 2010, when elections for the post of President were scheduled, a whip was issued by respondent No. 1 and the Nandurbar District NCP President directing members to vote for respondent No. 1. The petitioners violated the whip, leading to the election of a Congress candidate as President and petitioner No. 1 as Vice-President. Consequently, disqualification proceedings were initiated, and the Collector, Nandurbar passed an order disqualifying the petitioners under Sections 3(1)(a) and 3(1)(b) of the Act. The petitioners challenged the disqualification before the High Court. The single judge, noticing conflicting judgments on the interpretation of 'aghadi' and 'original political party', referred two questions to a larger Bench. The Full Bench heard arguments on the questions. The petitioners contended that the Act does not recognize a post-poll aghadi and that a merger under Section 5 must be at the national level, not merely at the municipal level. They relied on Kedar Shashikant Deshpande v. Bhor Municipal Council and Sunil Supadu Mahajan v. Manoj Dayaram Choudhari. The respondents argued that the formation of the aghadi was undisputed, that 'original party' means the municipal party in the council relying on Parshuram Prabhakar Uparkar v. Tukaram Bhagwan Barde, and that aghadi includes post-election groups as held in Pandurang Dagadu Parte v. Ramchandra Baburao Hirve. The court referred to the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Act, which aimed to eradicate political defection at the local authority level, and cited Mahadeo Nathuji Patil v. Surjabai Khushalchand Lakkad on the use of external aids in interpretation. The text of the judgment is truncated, and the final decision and reasoning on the reference questions are not available in the provided excerpt.

Headnote

A) Disqualification Law – Definition of Aghadi – Section 2(a) Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1986 – Whether post-poll alliance included – The term 'aghadi' defined as a group formed for setting up candidates for election; issue considered whether it includes a coalition of municipal parties formed after elections – Petitioners argued no concept of post-poll aghadi exists under Act, while respondents relied on Pandurang Dagadu Parte to include such groups – Final determination not ascertainable from truncated text. (Paras 1,5,9)

B) Disqualification Law – Meaning of Original Political Party – Section 5 Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1986 – Whether party at national level or municipal party – Petitioners submitted merger must be at national level under Section 5, citing Kedar Shashikant Deshpande; respondents contended 'original party' means party in council per Parshuram Prabhakar Uparkar – Court noted conflict of views, but final ruling not provided. (Paras 1,7,8)

C) Interpretation of Statutes – Aids to Construction – Statement of Objects and Reasons – Court referred to legislative intent and Mahadeo Nathuji Patil v. Surjabai Khushalchand Lakkad to consider purpose of curbing political defection at local level. (Paras 10,11)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the term aghadi or front as defined U/Sec. 2(a) of the Disqualification Act of 1986 would mean the party or aghadi on whose candidature the councillor is elected or would also include the aghadi of two or more municipal parties coming into existence after the elections are held? Whether the term original political party or aghadi appearing in Sec. 5 would mean the party at its National level or would mean a municipal party?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Definition of aghadi under Section 2(a) of the Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act
  • 1986
  • meaning of original political party under Section 5
  • validity of post-poll alliances
  • merger at municipal level versus national level
  • disqualification for violating whip
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (06) 14

WRIT PETITION NO.4323 OF 2011

2016-06-29

R.M.Borde, Sunil P. Deshmukh, Ravindra V. Ghuge

Shri P.M.Shah (Senior Counsel for petitioners), Mr.S.P.Shah (advocate for petitioners), Shri Mukul Kulkarni (advocate for Respondent No.1), Shri Umakant P. Giri (advocate for Respondent No.2), Mr.A.B.Girase (Government Pleader for Respondent No.3)

Shah Faruq Shabir, Deepak Kalu Patil, Ashish Fattu Mavchi, Smt. Sushila Lalji Ahire, Smt. Alkaben Subhashchandra Agrawal

Govindrao Ramu Vasave, Navapur Municipal Council, Collector, Nandurbar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Disqualification proceedings under Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1986.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners seek to set aside the Collector's order disqualifying them as councillors.

Filing Reason

Violation of whip issued by leader of aghadi and District President of NCP leading to disqualification under Sections 3(1)(a) and 3(1)(b).

Previous Decisions

Collector, Nandurbar disqualified the petitioners; writ petition filed and single judge referred questions to larger bench.

Issues

Whether the term aghadi or front as defined U/Sec. 2(a) of the Disqualification Act of 1986 would mean the party or aghadi on whose candidature the councillor is elected or would also include the aghadi of two or more municipal parties coming into existence after the elections are held? Whether the term original political party or aghadi appearing in Sec. 5 would mean the party at its National level or would mean a municipal party?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners contended that there is no recognition of a post-poll aghadi under the Disqualification Act; the coalition formed after elections has no legal existence, and its leader cannot issue a whip. They argued that merger under Section 5 must be of original political parties at the national level, not merely municipal parties, citing Kedar Shashikant Deshpande and others v. Bhor Municipal Council and others. Respondents argued that the formation of the aghadi is undisputed and that expression 'original party' means the municipal party in the council, relying on Parshuram Prabhakar Uparkar v. Tukaram Bhagwan Barde and others. They contended that the definition of aghadi includes post-election groups, as held in Pandurang Dagadu Parte v. Ramchandra Baburao Hirve & others, and that successive mergers are permissible under Umesh Shrikant Shetye v. Collector, Ratnagiri and others.

Judgment Excerpts

Whether the term aghadi or front as defined U/Sec. 2(a) of the Disqualification Act of 1986 would mean the party or aghadi on whose candidature the councillor is elected or would also include the aghadi of two or more municipal parties coming into existence after the elections are held? there is no concept of postpoll aghadi after elections, under the Disqualification Act. Section 2(a) defines 'aghadi' or 'front' to mean a group of persons who have formed themselves into a party for the purpose of setting up candidates for election to a local authority. the expression 'original party' will necessarily mean 'Zilla Parishad party' in the House of Zilla Parishad, or Municipal Party in the 'Municipal Council', as the case may be.

Procedural History

General elections to Municipal Council, Navapur held, petitioners elected as NCP councillors. Post-election aghadi formed on 01.12.2007 with NCP, BJP, Shiv Sena. Respondent No.1 elected leader of aghadi and later President. On 18.06.2010, petitioners and others sought approval of separate group. Whip issued by Respondent No.1 and NCP District President for vote in President election on 23.06.2010. Petitioners violated whip, leading to election of candidate from Congress and petitioner no.1 as Vice President. Disqualification petition filed before Collector, who disqualified petitioners under Sections 3(1)(a) and 3(1)(b). Writ petition filed challenging disqualification. Single Judge referred two questions to larger bench. Heard by Full Bench.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1986: 2(a), 3(1)(a), 3(1)(b), 5, 5(1)
  • Constitution of India: Tenth Schedule
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petition Challenging Irrigation Restoration Charges — Rate and Area of IRC Disputed; Petitioner Alleges Discrimination and Exorbitant Demand. Issue of whether IRC should be calculated at Rs. 50,000 per hectare as...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Considers Disqualification of Councillors Under Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1986. Reference to Larger Bench Addresses Meaning of 'Aghadi' and 'Original Political Party' Post-Elections.