Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Approval for Appointment of Assistant Teacher. Education Officer's Order Quashed for Violating Natural Justice and Ignoring Relevant Government Resolutions.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 52
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Burhani National Education Society and Shaikh Nisar Shaikh Sattar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order dated 30th March 2016 passed by the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The impugned order denied approval for the appointment of Shaikh Nisar as an assistant teacher. The petitioners contended that the order was passed without affording them an opportunity of hearing and without considering the Government Resolutions dated 30th April 1997 and 5th July 1999, which were relevant to the approval. The court heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Shamim R. Shaikh, and the learned Additional Government Pleader, Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, for the respondents. The court found that the impugned order was passed in violation of the principles of natural justice as no hearing was given to the petitioners. Additionally, the Education Officer failed to consider the relevant Government Resolutions. Consequently, the court quashed and set aside the order dated 30th March 2016 and remitted the matter back to the Education Officer for a fresh decision. The Education Officer was directed to decide the matter afresh after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and after considering the relevant Government Resolutions. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Denial of Approval - Right to be Heard - The Education Officer passed an order denying approval for appointment of an assistant teacher without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, which is violative of principles of natural justice. (Para 4)

B) Education Law - Appointment of Teachers - Approval - Government Resolutions - The Education Officer failed to consider the Government Resolutions dated 30th April 1997 and 5th July 1999 while passing the impugned order, which was a relevant factor. (Para 4)

C) Education Law - Approval of Appointment - Quashing of Order - The impugned order dated 30th March 2016 passed by the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad was quashed and set aside, and the matter was remitted back for fresh decision after hearing the petitioners and considering the relevant Government Resolutions. (Para 5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Education Officer could deny approval for the appointment of an assistant teacher without hearing the petitioners and without considering the relevant Government Resolutions.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 30th March 2016 passed by the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad is quashed and set aside. The matter is remitted back to the Education Officer to decide afresh after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and after considering the relevant Government Resolutions dated 30th April 1997 and 5th July 1999. The Education Officer shall decide the matter as expeditiously as possible.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Right to be heard
  • Approval of appointment
  • Government Resolutions
  • Education Officer's powers
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (05) 7

Writ Petition No. 3771 of 2016

2016-05-03

S.S. Shinde, Sangitrao S. Patil

Mr. Shamim R. Shaikh (holding for Mr. S.S. Kazi) for petitioners, Mr. S.B. Yawalkar (Addl. Government Pleader) for respondents

Burhani National Education Society and Shaikh Nisar Shaikh Sattar

The State of Maharashtra and The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging an order of the Education Officer denying approval for appointment of an assistant teacher.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the order dated 30th March 2016 passed by the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, and direction to grant approval for the appointment.

Filing Reason

The impugned order was passed without affording an opportunity of hearing and without considering relevant Government Resolutions.

Issues

Whether the impugned order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice? Whether the Education Officer failed to consider relevant Government Resolutions?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the order was passed without hearing them and without considering Government Resolutions dated 30th April 1997 and 5th July 1999. Respondents' counsel did not dispute the contentions.

Ratio Decidendi

An order denying approval for appointment must be passed after affording an opportunity of hearing to the concerned parties and after considering all relevant Government Resolutions. Failure to do so violates principles of natural justice and warrants quashing of the order.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned order is passed without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, which is in breach of principles of natural justice. The Education Officer has not considered the Government Resolutions dated 30th April 1997 and 5th July 1999.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 3771 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the order dated 30th March 2016 passed by the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The court heard the matter on 3rd May 2016 and disposed of the petition by allowing it.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Approval for Appointment of Assistant Teacher. Education Officer's Order Quashed for Violating Natural Justice and Ignoring Relevant Government Resolutions.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Agriculturist Due to Unexplained Delay in Granting Electricity Connection. The Court held that the respondent's delay of one decade after submission of test report constituted deficiency in service under the Co...