Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Double Insurance Leads to Joint Liability of Two Insurers. Parents of Deceased Awarded Rs.7,00,000 with Apportionment Between Reliance General and ICICI Lombard, Both Entitled to Recover from Owner.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 86
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the parents of a deceased person who died in a road accident involving a TATA Tipper bearing registration No. CG04ZC8638. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Buldhana, in M.A.C.P. No. 142 of 2008 decided on 11.12.2012, awarded compensation of Rs.5,00,000 inclusive of Rs.50,000 under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, with interest at 7.5% per annum. The Tribunal directed respondent No. 2, Reliance General Insurance Company, to pay the compensation and recover it from the owner. The claimants appealed seeking enhancement to Rs.8,49,000. The High Court noted that the offending vehicle was insured with two insurance companies: Reliance General Insurance Company (respondent No. 2) and ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. (respondent No. 3). The court held that both insurers are jointly and severally liable to pay compensation. On the quantum, the court assessed the deceased's notional income at Rs.4,000 per month, added 50% towards future prospects, deducted 1/3rd for personal expenses, applied a multiplier of 15, and added Rs.30,000 for loss of estate, Rs.30,000 for funeral expenses, and Rs.1,00,000 for loss of consortium, totaling Rs.7,00,000. The court modified the Tribunal's order to direct both insurance companies to pay the enhanced compensation equally, with the right to recover from the owner. The appeal was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Double Insurance - Joint Liability - Sections 140, 149, 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Where a vehicle is insured with two different insurance companies at the time of accident, both insurers are jointly and severally liable to pay compensation to the claimants, with a right to recover the amount from the owner of the vehicle. The Tribunal's direction to only one insurer to pay and recover was modified to apportion liability equally between the two insurers. (Paras 5-7)

B) Motor Accident Claims - Enhancement of Compensation - Multiplier Method - Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The High Court enhanced compensation from Rs.5,00,000 to Rs.7,00,000 by applying a multiplier of 15 to the deceased's notional income of Rs.4,000 per month, adding 50% towards future prospects, and deducting 1/3rd towards personal expenses, along with conventional heads. (Paras 4-5)

C) Motor Accident Claims - Pay and Recover - Section 149 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The insurance company directed to pay compensation to the claimants is entitled to recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle if there is a breach of policy conditions, such as the vehicle being driven without a valid driving license. (Para 6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the claimants are entitled to enhanced compensation and whether both insurance companies are jointly liable to pay compensation when the vehicle was insured with two different insurers at the time of accident.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The compensation is enhanced from Rs.5,00,000 to Rs.7,00,000. Both respondent No. 2 and respondent No. 3 insurance companies are directed to pay the compensation amount equally, with the right to recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle. The award shall carry interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till realization.

Law Points

  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 140
  • Section 166
  • Section 149
  • double insurance
  • joint liability
  • pay and recover
  • enhancement of compensation
  • multiplier method
  • contributory negligence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (01) 149

First Appeal No. 344 of 2015

2016-01-14

R. K. Deshpande

Shri N.B. Kalwaghe for appellants, Shri D.N. Kukday for Respondent No.2, Shri R.D. Bhuibhar for Respondent No.3

Gopalrao Punjaji Gayki and Smt. Kalpana Gopalrao Gayki

Gopal s/o Dnyandeo Wakode, The Manager, Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd., and The Manager, I.C.I.C.I Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against the judgment of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarding compensation in a motor accident claim petition.

Remedy Sought

The appellants (claimants) sought enhancement of compensation from Rs.5,00,000 to Rs.8,49,000.

Filing Reason

The claimants were dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal and the direction to only one insurance company to pay and recover.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Buldhana, in M.A.C.P. No. 142 of 2008 decided on 11.12.2012, awarded Rs.5,00,000 with interest at 7.5% per annum and directed respondent No. 2 to pay and recover from the owner.

Issues

Whether the claimants are entitled to enhanced compensation? Whether both insurance companies are jointly liable to pay compensation when the vehicle was insured with two insurers?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued for enhancement of compensation to Rs.8,49,000 based on the Tribunal's findings. Respondent No. 2 argued that the Tribunal ought to have held both insurance companies liable as the vehicle was insured with two companies.

Ratio Decidendi

In case of double insurance, both insurers are jointly and severally liable to pay compensation to the claimants, and they are entitled to recover the amount from the owner. The multiplier method with addition of future prospects and conventional heads is appropriate for computing compensation.

Judgment Excerpts

The Tribunal has held that the claimants are entitled to compensation of Rs.5,00,000/ inclusive of the amount of Rs.50,000/ towards interim compensation under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act... The Tribunal, according to him, ought to have, therefore, held both the Insurance Companies jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation. In view of the above, the compensation is enhanced to Rs.7,00,000/.

Procedural History

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Buldhana, decided M.A.C.P. No. 142 of 2008 on 11.12.2012 awarding compensation. The claimants filed First Appeal No. 344 of 2015 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which issued notice for final disposal on 28.09.2015 and heard the matter on 14.01.2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 140, 149, 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Double Insurance Leads to Joint Liability of Two Insurers. Parents of Deceased Awarded Rs.7,00,000 with Apportionment Between Reliance General and ICICI Lombard, Both En...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reversion of Workman from Mukadam to Labourer Held Unjustified. Employer Cannot Benefit from Its Own Mistake in Showing Designation as Mukadam in Proposal.