Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes CBI Court Order Directing FIR Registration in Corruption Case — Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 156 CrPC. Special Judge Cannot Direct Investigation Without Complaint Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Prosecution
  • 80
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, the Police Inspector and Superintendent of Police of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), challenged an order dated 3.5.2014 passed by the Special Judge, CBI Court for Goa at Mapusa in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 2/2014. The impugned order directed the petitioners to register an FIR against one Shri Caetano Silva under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and other penal provisions, subject to certain conditions. The background of the case involves a complaint filed by respondent nos. 2 and 3 (Kashinath Jairam Shetye and Dr. Ketan Govekar) against MLAs, MPs, and other public servants alleging that they were holding public offices despite being foreign nationals or having lost their Indian citizenship, which allegedly violated the Indian Citizenship Act, 1955 and constituted criminal misconduct under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Special Judge, purportedly exercising powers under Section 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), directed the CBI to register an FIR. The petitioners contended that the Special Judge had no jurisdiction to pass such an order under Section 156 CrPC as no complaint was filed before the court, and the power under Section 156 CrPC is exercisable only by a Magistrate upon a complaint. The respondents argued that the Special Judge has the powers of a Magistrate under the CrPC and could direct investigation. The court analyzed the provisions of Section 156 CrPC and the scheme of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. It held that the power under Section 156 CrPC to direct investigation is available only to a Magistrate who has taken cognizance of an offence upon a complaint. A Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act is not a Magistrate and cannot exercise powers under Section 156 CrPC in the absence of a complaint. The court further noted that the allegations regarding citizenship did not fall within the purview of the Prevention of Corruption Act without specific averments of corrupt practices. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order, and held that the Special Judge acted without jurisdiction.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 156 CrPC - Power to Order Investigation - The Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 does not have the power under Section 156 CrPC to direct registration of an FIR without a complaint being filed before the court. The power under Section 156 CrPC is exercisable only when a complaint is presented to the Magistrate. In the absence of a complaint, the order directing investigation is without jurisdiction. (Paras 4-10)

B) Prevention of Corruption Act - Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) - Criminal Misconduct - The complaint alleged that public servants holding office despite being foreign nationals or having lost Indian citizenship constitutes criminal misconduct under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The court held that such allegations do not fall within the purview of the Act without specific averments of corrupt practices. (Paras 5-6)

C) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 156(3) CrPC - Magistrate's Power - The power under Section 156(3) CrPC to direct investigation is available only to a Magistrate who has taken cognizance of an offence. A Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act is not a Magistrate and cannot exercise powers under Section 156 CrPC. (Paras 8-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Special Judge, CBI Court, has jurisdiction under Section 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to direct the police to register an FIR in the absence of a complaint filed before the court?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. Impugned order dated 3.5.2014 passed by Special Judge, CBI Court at Mapusa in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 2/2014 is quashed and set aside.

Law Points

  • Section 156 CrPC does not empower a Special Judge to direct registration of FIR without a complaint
  • Special Judge's powers under Section 156 CrPC are limited to cases where a complaint is filed
  • Order directing FIR registration without complaint is without jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015:BHC-GOA:2270-DB

Criminal Writ Petition No.21 of 2015

2015-09-16

F. M. Reis, K. L. Wadane

2015:BHC-GOA:2270-DB

Mr. J. Vaz, Special Public Prosecutor for the petitioners; Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Advocate General with Mr. D. Lawande, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent no.1; Respondent no. 2 in person

The Police Inspector, Central Bureau of Investigation, Bambolim, Goa and The Superintendent of Police, CBI, Bambolim, Goa

State of Goa, Mr. Kashinath Jairam Shetye, Dr. Ketan Govekar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition challenging order of Special Judge directing registration of FIR

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 3.5.2014 passed by Special Judge, CBI Court directing petitioners to register FIR

Filing Reason

Petitioners challenged the order on ground of lack of jurisdiction under Section 156 CrPC

Previous Decisions

Special Judge, CBI Court passed order dated 3.5.2014 in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 2/2014 directing registration of FIR

Issues

Whether Special Judge under Prevention of Corruption Act has power under Section 156 CrPC to direct registration of FIR without a complaint? Whether allegations of holding public office despite loss of citizenship fall under Prevention of Corruption Act?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that Special Judge has no jurisdiction under Section 156 CrPC as no complaint was filed before the court Respondents argued that Special Judge has powers of Magistrate under CrPC and can direct investigation

Ratio Decidendi

The power under Section 156 CrPC to direct investigation is exercisable only by a Magistrate upon a complaint. A Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act is not a Magistrate and cannot exercise such power in the absence of a complaint. The order directing FIR registration without a complaint is without jurisdiction.

Judgment Excerpts

The power under Section 156 of Cr.P.C. is available only to a Magistrate who has taken cognizance of an offence upon a complaint. The Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act is not a Magistrate and cannot exercise powers under Section 156 Cr.P.C. in the absence of a complaint.

Procedural History

Respondent nos. 2 and 3 filed a complaint before Special Judge, CBI Court. Special Judge passed order dated 3.5.2014 in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 2/2014 directing petitioners to register FIR. Petitioners challenged this order by filing Criminal Writ Petition No.21 of 2015 before High Court of Bombay at Goa.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 156
  • Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988: Section 13(1)(d), Section 13(2)
  • Indian Citizenship Act, 1955:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes SSRD Order in Land Revenue Revision Case — Upholds Validity of Registered Sale Deed and Entry No.3298. Petitioner's Title Based on Registered Sale Deed Cannot Be Disturbed by Suo-Motu Revision After 11 Years Without Notic...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Corrects High Court's Erroneous Observations in Property Title Dispute Under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Court held that mischaracterization of claims and previous orders in the judgment required correction to ...