High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Death of Cobbler/Agricultural Labourer. Insurer Liable Jointly and Severally with Driver and Owner for Rs.2 Lacs with 9% Interest Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 23
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, New India Assurance Company Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 27.8.2002 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Akola, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.113 of 1998. The Tribunal had allowed the claim petition filed by the legal representatives of deceased Devidas Salunke, holding the driver, owner, and insurance company jointly and severally liable to deposit Rs.2,00,000 as compensation with interest at 9% per annum from the date of petition till realization. The deceased, Devidas Salunke, was a cobbler and agricultural labourer. On 1.6.1997, while returning from a marriage ceremony at village Kawatha to his village Shirsoli in a Matador bearing registration No.MH28/9713, the vehicle met with an accident on Risod-Malegaon Road near Jamthi Phata within the jurisdiction of Shripur Police Station, Washim, due to rash and negligent driving. The claimants, being the widow, minor children, and aged parents of the deceased, sought compensation. The Tribunal assessed the compensation based on the notional income of the deceased and awarded Rs.2,00,000. The insurance company appealed, contending that the Tribunal erred in holding it liable. The High Court, after hearing counsel for the appellant and respondent No.6 (owner), found no merit in the appeal and dismissed it, upholding the Tribunal's award. The court noted that the insurance company failed to establish any breach of policy conditions or other grounds to avoid liability. The judgment was reserved on 11.8.2015 and pronounced on 21.8.2015.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Joint and Several Liability - Sections 166, 168 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The Tribunal held the driver, owner, and insurance company jointly and severally liable to pay compensation of Rs.2,00,000 with 9% interest per annum from the date of petition till realization to the legal representatives of deceased Devidas Salunke, who died in a motor vehicle accident due to rash and negligent driving. The High Court upheld the award, finding no error in the Tribunal's decision. (Paras 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal was justified in holding the insurance company jointly and severally liable to pay compensation along with the driver and owner of the offending vehicle.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Akola, dated 27.8.2002 in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.113 of 1998.

Law Points

  • Joint and several liability of insurer
  • driver
  • and owner in motor accident claims
  • Compensation for loss of dependency based on notional income of deceased
  • Interest rate of 9% per annum from date of petition till realization
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (08) 155

First Appeal No.509 of 2004

2015-08-21

A. P. Bhangale, J.

Shri A.J. Pophaly for Appellant, Shri R.C. Joshi for Respondent No.6

New India Assurance Company Ltd.

Baby Nanda Wd/o Devidas Salunke & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal by insurance company against award of compensation in motor accident claim petition.

Remedy Sought

Insurance company sought to challenge the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Akola, which held it jointly and severally liable to pay compensation.

Filing Reason

The insurance company contended that the Tribunal erred in holding it liable to pay compensation.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Akola, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.113 of 1998, allowed the claim and awarded Rs.2,00,000 with 9% interest per annum from the date of petition till realization, holding the driver, owner, and insurance company jointly and severally liable.

Issues

Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding the insurance company jointly and severally liable to pay compensation along with the driver and owner of the offending vehicle.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (Insurance Company) argued that the Tribunal erred in holding it liable. Respondent No.6 (Owner) supported the award.

Ratio Decidendi

The insurance company failed to establish any breach of policy conditions or other grounds to avoid liability; hence, it is jointly and severally liable with the driver and owner to pay compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

Judgment Excerpts

By this appeal, the appellantInsurance Company has sought to challenge judgment and award dated 27.8.2002, passed by learned Member of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Akola, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.113 of 1998, whereby the petition filed by the claimants legal representatives of deceased Devidas Salunke; was allowed holding that the driver/owner of the offending motor vehicle and insurance company shall jointly and severally deposit with the Tribunal amount of Rs.2.00 Lacs towards compensation along with interest at the rate of nine percent per annum from the date of claim petition till realization of the amount.

Procedural History

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Akola, passed the award on 27.8.2002 in M.A.C.P. No.113 of 1998. The insurance company filed First Appeal No.509 of 2004 before the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur. The appeal was reserved for judgment on 11.8.2015 and pronounced on 21.8.2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 166, 168, 173
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Death of Cobbler/Agricultural Labourer. Insurer Liable Jointly and Severally with Driver and Owner for Rs.2 Lacs with 9% Interest...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Clarifies Prospective Application of Tarsem Singh Judgment on Solatium and Interest for NHAI Land Acquisitions. The court held that the benefit of solatium and interest under Sections 23(2) and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is av...