Bombay High Court Allows Minority Institution's Petition Against AICTE's Refusal to Grant Approval for Engineering Course, Following Earlier Decisions in Similar Matters. The court held that the issues were identical to those in Saraswati Education Society's Saraswati College of Engineering v. AICTE and Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil College of Engineering v. AICTE, and disposed of the petition accordingly.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 57
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Hyderabad (Sind) National Collegiate Board and Watumall Institute of Electronics, Engineering and Computer Technology, are a minority Sindhi community institution running various colleges and schools. They filed a writ petition on 8 May 2015 challenging the refusal of the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) to grant approval for an engineering course. The court noted that the issues raised in this petition were identical to those in two earlier writ petitions: Saraswati Education Society's Saraswati College of Engineering v. AICTE (Writ Petition No.4586 of 2015) and Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil College of Engineering v. AICTE (Writ Petition No.4620 of 2015), which had already been decided in favor of the petitioners. The parties conceded that this petition must succeed on the same grounds. The court, therefore, disposed of the petition in terms of the earlier judgments, allowing the petition and setting aside the impugned communication/order of AICTE. The court directed AICTE to consider the petitioners' application for approval afresh in accordance with law and in light of the earlier judgments.

Headnote

A) Educational Law - Minority Institution - AICTE Approval - Binding Precedent - The petitioners, a minority Sindhi community institution, challenged AICTE's refusal to grant approval for an engineering course. The court, following its earlier judgments in Saraswati Education Society's Saraswati College of Engineering v. AICTE and Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil College of Engineering v. AICTE, held that the issues were identical and allowed the petition on the same grounds. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petition filed by a minority institution challenging AICTE's refusal to grant approval for an engineering course should succeed in light of earlier judgments on identical issues.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned communication/order of AICTE is set aside. AICTE is directed to consider the petitioners' application for approval afresh in accordance with law and in light of the judgments in Saraswati Education Society's Saraswati College of Engineering v. AICTE and Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil College of Engineering v. AICTE. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Minority institution rights
  • AICTE approval
  • binding precedent
  • common order
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (08) 35

Writ Petition No.4807 of 2015

2015-08-24

Anoop V. Mohta, A.A. Sayed

Mr. Pravin Shewale i/b. Mr. J.S. Chandnani for the Petitioners, Mr. Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate with Mr. S.S. Jadhav and Mr. Sarnath Sariputta for Respondent Nos.1 & 2, Ms S.S. Bhende, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for Respondent Nos.3 & 4, Mr. R.A. Rodrigues for Respondent No.6

Hyderabad (Sind) National Collegiate Board & Anr.

All India Council for Technical Education & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging AICTE's refusal to grant approval for an engineering course.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to quash the impugned communication/order of AICTE and direct them to grant approval for the engineering course.

Filing Reason

AICTE refused to grant approval for the engineering course run by the petitioners' institute.

Previous Decisions

This Court had earlier allowed similar petitions in Saraswati Education Society's Saraswati College of Engineering v. AICTE and Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil College of Engineering v. AICTE.

Issues

Whether the petition should succeed in light of earlier judgments on identical issues.

Submissions/Arguments

Counsel for the parties conceded that the issues are identical to those in earlier writ petitions and that this petition must succeed.

Ratio Decidendi

Where the issues in a petition are identical to those in earlier decided petitions, the petition must succeed on the same grounds and be disposed of in terms of those judgments.

Judgment Excerpts

Counsel appearing for the parties conceded the position that in view of the judgment passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.4586 of 2015 (Saraswati Education Society's Saraswati College of Engineering V/s. All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) & Anr) and in Writ Petition No.4620 of 2015 (Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil college of Engineering V/s. All India Council for Technical Education & Ors.) this petition must succeed as the issues are identical in present writ petition and, therefore, it can be disposed of for the recorded common facts and the reasons in the said judgments.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No.4807 of 2015 on 8 May 2015. The court heard the matter on 24 August 2015 and disposed it of in terms of earlier judgments.

Acts & Sections

  • Societies Registration Act, 1860:
  • Bombay Public Trust Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Minority Institution's Petition Against AICTE's Refusal to Grant Approval for Engineering Course, Following Earlier Decisions in Similar Matters. The court held that the issues were identical to those in Saraswati Education S...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Clarified Permanent Alimony Covers All Maintenance Claims – No Further Dues Payable. Miscellaneous Application Seeking Additional Maintenance Rejected – Rs. 50 Lakh Permanent Alimony Held as Full and Final Settlement